电影中的美国犹太人故事

IF 0.2 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
Film History Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI:10.7560/744301
Oscar Winberg
{"title":"电影中的美国犹太人故事","authors":"Oscar Winberg","doi":"10.7560/744301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The American Jewish Story through Cinema Eric A. Goldman, Texas: The University of Texas Press, 2013. $55 hardcover, $25 paperback, 264 pages.In his new book, The American Jewish Story through Cinema, Eric A. Goldman attempts to explore the American Jewish story by looking at film. Note the word story: not history, not experience, but story. This is of central importance for the work since it is this point that makes an assessment of it so difficult. The scholarship on American Jews and film is and has been rather strong at least since the 1980s. At first glance, Goldman's book seems to be another addition to this scholarship of which Patricia Erens' The Jew in American Cinema (Indiana, 1985) is perhaps the most noteworthy. Goldman has, however, carved out a niche for himself, looking at the collective Jewish story not on film but through film, essentially making movies the building blocks for his narrative. It is an intriguing and engaging narrative. In some ways Goldman's book reads like a lecture - in a good sense, as he is able to write engagingly and has a talent for weaving a narrative.The main problem with Goldman's book is his explicit goal to use \"the medium of cinema to provide an understanding of the changing situation of the American Jew over the last century\" (ix). Goldman makes it clear that he is not looking to tell the story of how Jews are presented on the silver screen over the 20th century, nor is he seemingly interested in writing the history of the Jewish community in America in the 20th century while incorporating cinema in his analysis. Rather, he goes to great lengths to separate his work from these alternatives by arguing that he is telling the story of the collective Jewish experience in 20th century America with the help of film representations, in a way making the movies themselves nothing more than illustrations of the themes and attitudes he is trying to portray. As he puts it, cinema is \"a way of telling the story, a Haggadah of what has transpired for Jews in America\" (xii). As Goldman earlier defines Haggadah as the \"traditional 'telling' of the story\" (ix) one is left with the sense that he is not writing an academic history but rather a story. In fact, the reason the book reads like a lecture is that the analysis is informal: Goldman seems more interested in presenting a point with movie clips than in actually exploring a scholarly question in an open and methodologically sound way. Nevertheless, it is clear that Goldman possesses a deep understanding of the subject matter and the book is inarguably well written.Goldman chooses nine films for his analysis, each either individually or in pairs representing a certain decade, or period. While his selections are intriguing, he offers little insight into his criteria of selection, stating only that \"I have chosen select films that I consider representative of specific historical periods\" (xii). As a result, the nine films are a motley crew, including some of the most important films of Jews in America and some more obscure, though not unknown, films. Among the former are The Jazz Singer (1927), Gentleman's Agreement (1947), The Young Lions (1958), The Way We Were (1973) and arguably The Prince of Tides (1991) while Crossfire (1947), Avalon (1990), Liberty Heights (1999) and Everything is Illuminated (2005) fall into the latter category. …","PeriodicalId":51888,"journal":{"name":"Film History","volume":"119 1","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The American Jewish Story through Cinema\",\"authors\":\"Oscar Winberg\",\"doi\":\"10.7560/744301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The American Jewish Story through Cinema Eric A. Goldman, Texas: The University of Texas Press, 2013. $55 hardcover, $25 paperback, 264 pages.In his new book, The American Jewish Story through Cinema, Eric A. Goldman attempts to explore the American Jewish story by looking at film. Note the word story: not history, not experience, but story. This is of central importance for the work since it is this point that makes an assessment of it so difficult. The scholarship on American Jews and film is and has been rather strong at least since the 1980s. At first glance, Goldman's book seems to be another addition to this scholarship of which Patricia Erens' The Jew in American Cinema (Indiana, 1985) is perhaps the most noteworthy. Goldman has, however, carved out a niche for himself, looking at the collective Jewish story not on film but through film, essentially making movies the building blocks for his narrative. It is an intriguing and engaging narrative. In some ways Goldman's book reads like a lecture - in a good sense, as he is able to write engagingly and has a talent for weaving a narrative.The main problem with Goldman's book is his explicit goal to use \\\"the medium of cinema to provide an understanding of the changing situation of the American Jew over the last century\\\" (ix). Goldman makes it clear that he is not looking to tell the story of how Jews are presented on the silver screen over the 20th century, nor is he seemingly interested in writing the history of the Jewish community in America in the 20th century while incorporating cinema in his analysis. Rather, he goes to great lengths to separate his work from these alternatives by arguing that he is telling the story of the collective Jewish experience in 20th century America with the help of film representations, in a way making the movies themselves nothing more than illustrations of the themes and attitudes he is trying to portray. As he puts it, cinema is \\\"a way of telling the story, a Haggadah of what has transpired for Jews in America\\\" (xii). As Goldman earlier defines Haggadah as the \\\"traditional 'telling' of the story\\\" (ix) one is left with the sense that he is not writing an academic history but rather a story. In fact, the reason the book reads like a lecture is that the analysis is informal: Goldman seems more interested in presenting a point with movie clips than in actually exploring a scholarly question in an open and methodologically sound way. Nevertheless, it is clear that Goldman possesses a deep understanding of the subject matter and the book is inarguably well written.Goldman chooses nine films for his analysis, each either individually or in pairs representing a certain decade, or period. While his selections are intriguing, he offers little insight into his criteria of selection, stating only that \\\"I have chosen select films that I consider representative of specific historical periods\\\" (xii). As a result, the nine films are a motley crew, including some of the most important films of Jews in America and some more obscure, though not unknown, films. Among the former are The Jazz Singer (1927), Gentleman's Agreement (1947), The Young Lions (1958), The Way We Were (1973) and arguably The Prince of Tides (1991) while Crossfire (1947), Avalon (1990), Liberty Heights (1999) and Everything is Illuminated (2005) fall into the latter category. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":51888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Film History\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Film History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7560/744301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Film History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7560/744301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《电影中的美国犹太人故事》埃里克·a·戈德曼著,德克萨斯:德克萨斯大学出版社,2013年。精装本55美元,平装本25美元,264页。在他的新书《电影中的美国犹太人故事》中,埃里克·a·戈德曼试图通过电影来探索美国犹太人的故事。注意“故事”这个词:不是历史,不是经历,而是故事。这一点对这项工作至关重要,因为正是这一点使评估工作变得如此困难。至少从20世纪80年代开始,关于美国犹太人和电影的学术研究一直相当强大。乍一看,戈德曼的书似乎是对帕特里夏·埃伦斯的《美国电影中的犹太人》(印第安纳州,1985年)可能是最值得注意的学术研究的又一补充。然而,戈德曼为自己开辟了一个利基市场,他不是通过电影,而是通过电影来看待犹太人的集体故事,本质上是让电影成为他叙事的基石。这是一个引人入胜的故事。在某些方面,戈德曼的书读起来就像一场讲座——从某种意义上说,因为他能够写得引人入胜,并具有编织叙事的才能。高盛的主要问题的书是他的明确目标使用“媒介的电影提供一个了解情况的变化的美国犹太人在过去的世纪”(ix)。高盛明确表示,他并不打算告诉犹太人的故事在银幕上呈现在20世纪,他似乎也对写作感兴趣的历史犹太社区在美国在20世纪将电影在他的分析。相反,他不遗余力地将自己的作品与这些另类作品区分开来,他认为自己是在电影表现形式的帮助下讲述20世纪美国犹太人的集体经历,在某种程度上,电影本身只不过是他试图描绘的主题和态度的例证。正如他所说,电影是“讲述故事的一种方式,是美国犹太人所经历的哈加达”(第十二章)。正如戈德曼早先将哈加达定义为“故事的传统‘讲述’”(第九章),人们会觉得他不是在写一部学术历史,而是在写一个故事。事实上,这本书读起来像一篇讲座的原因在于分析是非正式的:戈德曼似乎更感兴趣的是用电影片段来表达一个观点,而不是以一种开放的、方法论上合理的方式来探索一个学术问题。尽管如此,很明显,戈德曼对主题有着深刻的理解,这本书写得无可争议。高盛选择了9部电影进行分析,每一部或单独或成对地代表一个特定的十年或时期。虽然他的选择很有趣,但他并没有深入了解他的选择标准,只是说“我选择了我认为具有特定历史时期代表性的电影”(xii)。因此,这九部电影是一个杂七杂八的团队,包括一些最重要的犹太人在美国的电影和一些更晦涩的电影,尽管不是未知的,电影。前者包括《爵士歌手》(1927年)、《君子协定》(1947年)、《年轻的狮子》(1958年)、《我们曾经的生活》(1973年)和《潮汐王子》(1991年),而后者则包括《穿越火线》(1947年)、《阿瓦隆》(1990年)、《自由高地》(1999年)和《一切都被照亮》(2005年)。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The American Jewish Story through Cinema
The American Jewish Story through Cinema Eric A. Goldman, Texas: The University of Texas Press, 2013. $55 hardcover, $25 paperback, 264 pages.In his new book, The American Jewish Story through Cinema, Eric A. Goldman attempts to explore the American Jewish story by looking at film. Note the word story: not history, not experience, but story. This is of central importance for the work since it is this point that makes an assessment of it so difficult. The scholarship on American Jews and film is and has been rather strong at least since the 1980s. At first glance, Goldman's book seems to be another addition to this scholarship of which Patricia Erens' The Jew in American Cinema (Indiana, 1985) is perhaps the most noteworthy. Goldman has, however, carved out a niche for himself, looking at the collective Jewish story not on film but through film, essentially making movies the building blocks for his narrative. It is an intriguing and engaging narrative. In some ways Goldman's book reads like a lecture - in a good sense, as he is able to write engagingly and has a talent for weaving a narrative.The main problem with Goldman's book is his explicit goal to use "the medium of cinema to provide an understanding of the changing situation of the American Jew over the last century" (ix). Goldman makes it clear that he is not looking to tell the story of how Jews are presented on the silver screen over the 20th century, nor is he seemingly interested in writing the history of the Jewish community in America in the 20th century while incorporating cinema in his analysis. Rather, he goes to great lengths to separate his work from these alternatives by arguing that he is telling the story of the collective Jewish experience in 20th century America with the help of film representations, in a way making the movies themselves nothing more than illustrations of the themes and attitudes he is trying to portray. As he puts it, cinema is "a way of telling the story, a Haggadah of what has transpired for Jews in America" (xii). As Goldman earlier defines Haggadah as the "traditional 'telling' of the story" (ix) one is left with the sense that he is not writing an academic history but rather a story. In fact, the reason the book reads like a lecture is that the analysis is informal: Goldman seems more interested in presenting a point with movie clips than in actually exploring a scholarly question in an open and methodologically sound way. Nevertheless, it is clear that Goldman possesses a deep understanding of the subject matter and the book is inarguably well written.Goldman chooses nine films for his analysis, each either individually or in pairs representing a certain decade, or period. While his selections are intriguing, he offers little insight into his criteria of selection, stating only that "I have chosen select films that I consider representative of specific historical periods" (xii). As a result, the nine films are a motley crew, including some of the most important films of Jews in America and some more obscure, though not unknown, films. Among the former are The Jazz Singer (1927), Gentleman's Agreement (1947), The Young Lions (1958), The Way We Were (1973) and arguably The Prince of Tides (1991) while Crossfire (1947), Avalon (1990), Liberty Heights (1999) and Everything is Illuminated (2005) fall into the latter category. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Film History
Film History FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The subject of Film History is the historical development of the motion picture, and the social, technological, and economic context in which this has occurred. Its areas of interest range from the technical through all aspects of production and distribution. Active electronic and combined electronic/print subscriptions to this journal include access to the online backrun.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信