外科心脏交感神经去神经在所有病因性室性心律失常治疗中的应用:系统综述

C. L., W. R., E. D.
{"title":"外科心脏交感神经去神经在所有病因性室性心律失常治疗中的应用:系统综述","authors":"C. L., W. R., E. D.","doi":"10.26420/austinjclincardiolog.2022.1094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The antiadrenergic and antifibrillatory effects of cardiac sympathectomy in pathological states such as long QT syndrome are well established. The indications for the procedure have expanded since the videoassisted thoracoscopic approach was first used. However, the procedure is currently largely used in cases where medication has failed to prevent recurrence of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia, or in cases of medication intolerance, and large randomised controlled trials are thus non-existent in the literature. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the available literature to examine the utility of cardiac denervation in the management of all ventricular arrhythmias. Methods: A total of 17 studies published between 2009 and 2019 were evaluated for bias using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. In addition the Harbour and Miller Grading System (2001) was used to assess the significance of the evidence in this review. Results: All studies demonstrated a protective effect of sympathectomy against ventricular arrhythmias in both primary and secondary prevention strategies. The following risk of bias was observed: low in 5 studies, moderate in 8 studies, and serious risk in 4 studies. The highest level of evidence observed was 2++ in 3 studies. Conclusion: Cardiac sympathetic denervation provides benefit for patients with ventricular arrhythmias, in cases of refractory disease or in patients who require a primary prevention strategy where first-line therapies are not tolerated.","PeriodicalId":90445,"journal":{"name":"Austin journal of clinical cardiology","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Utility of Surgical Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation in the Management of Ventricular Arrhythmias for all Etiologies: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"C. L., W. R., E. D.\",\"doi\":\"10.26420/austinjclincardiolog.2022.1094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The antiadrenergic and antifibrillatory effects of cardiac sympathectomy in pathological states such as long QT syndrome are well established. The indications for the procedure have expanded since the videoassisted thoracoscopic approach was first used. However, the procedure is currently largely used in cases where medication has failed to prevent recurrence of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia, or in cases of medication intolerance, and large randomised controlled trials are thus non-existent in the literature. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the available literature to examine the utility of cardiac denervation in the management of all ventricular arrhythmias. Methods: A total of 17 studies published between 2009 and 2019 were evaluated for bias using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. In addition the Harbour and Miller Grading System (2001) was used to assess the significance of the evidence in this review. Results: All studies demonstrated a protective effect of sympathectomy against ventricular arrhythmias in both primary and secondary prevention strategies. The following risk of bias was observed: low in 5 studies, moderate in 8 studies, and serious risk in 4 studies. The highest level of evidence observed was 2++ in 3 studies. Conclusion: Cardiac sympathetic denervation provides benefit for patients with ventricular arrhythmias, in cases of refractory disease or in patients who require a primary prevention strategy where first-line therapies are not tolerated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austin journal of clinical cardiology\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austin journal of clinical cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjclincardiolog.2022.1094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin journal of clinical cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjclincardiolog.2022.1094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:心脏交感神经切除术在长QT综合征等病理状态下的抗肾上腺素能和抗纤颤作用已得到证实。自首次使用电视胸腔镜入路以来,该手术的适应症已经扩大。然而,该方法目前主要用于药物不能预防症状性室性心律失常复发的病例,或药物不耐受的病例,因此文献中不存在大型随机对照试验。本研究的目的是对现有文献进行系统回顾,以检查心脏去神经支配在治疗所有室性心律失常中的作用。方法:使用非随机干预研究的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)工具对2009年至2019年发表的17项研究进行偏倚评估。此外,Harbour和Miller分级系统(2001)用于评估本综述中证据的重要性。结果:所有的研究都证明了交感神经切除术在一级和二级预防策略中对室性心律失常的保护作用。观察到的偏倚风险如下:5项研究为低风险,8项研究为中等风险,4项研究为严重风险。在3项研究中观察到的最高证据水平为2++。结论:心脏交感神经去支配对室性心律失常患者、难治性疾病患者或需要一级预防策略而一线治疗不能耐受的患者有益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Utility of Surgical Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation in the Management of Ventricular Arrhythmias for all Etiologies: A Systematic Review
Background: The antiadrenergic and antifibrillatory effects of cardiac sympathectomy in pathological states such as long QT syndrome are well established. The indications for the procedure have expanded since the videoassisted thoracoscopic approach was first used. However, the procedure is currently largely used in cases where medication has failed to prevent recurrence of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia, or in cases of medication intolerance, and large randomised controlled trials are thus non-existent in the literature. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the available literature to examine the utility of cardiac denervation in the management of all ventricular arrhythmias. Methods: A total of 17 studies published between 2009 and 2019 were evaluated for bias using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. In addition the Harbour and Miller Grading System (2001) was used to assess the significance of the evidence in this review. Results: All studies demonstrated a protective effect of sympathectomy against ventricular arrhythmias in both primary and secondary prevention strategies. The following risk of bias was observed: low in 5 studies, moderate in 8 studies, and serious risk in 4 studies. The highest level of evidence observed was 2++ in 3 studies. Conclusion: Cardiac sympathetic denervation provides benefit for patients with ventricular arrhythmias, in cases of refractory disease or in patients who require a primary prevention strategy where first-line therapies are not tolerated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信