伤口愈合过程中炎症反应的免疫组织化学特征及使用皮下聚乙烯醇(PVA)海绵植入评估愈合过程

S. A. El-Aleem, A. Muftah, E. Jude
{"title":"伤口愈合过程中炎症反应的免疫组织化学特征及使用皮下聚乙烯醇(PVA)海绵植入评估愈合过程","authors":"S. A. El-Aleem, A. Muftah, E. Jude","doi":"10.4172/2157-7099.1000519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Biologic and synthetic biomaterials have been used for various medical applications and research studies. Subcutaneous implantation of Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) sponge is a commonly used experimental model to study the underlying mechanisms of wound healing. As a research tool, PVA sponge is useful for analyzing the granulation tissue formation and tissue regeneration. Hypothesis and Aims: PVA sponge model might show a different inflammatory response from the open incisional wound model because it reflects the host response to a foreign body. Thus, this study aims to characterize the inflammatory responses in the two models. Materials and Methods: Adult male albino rats were used to produce the two models of wound healing. Through a midline incision, two PVA sponges were implanted subcutaneously on each side. Two incisional dermal wounds were produced on the dorsum of each rat. At the end of the experiments, the sponges and the incisional wounds were harvested at different time points for assessing the inflammatory responses. Immunohistochemical staining was used to study the cellular localization and the profile of the inflammatory markers iNOS and TGF Beta-and Western blot analysis used to study their protein levels. Results: Immunohistochemical staining and Western blot analysis showed a distinct variability in the inflammatory responses between the two wound models. PVA sponge implantation model showed a delayed and a persistent inflammation started 3 days post-implantation and persisted as long as the sponge existed. On the other hand, the incisional wound model showed an early and a time limited response started 1 day and ended 5-7 days post-wounding. Moreover, the inflammatory mediators iNOS and TGF Beta-1 were differentially regulated in both models. While, they showed a similar profile along the time course in the PVA sponge model. They showed a differential profile in the open wound model. Conclusion: subcutaneous PVA sponge provides an ideal reproducible model for use in inflammation research. However, it may not be a reliable model for wound healing modulation studies. It elects inflammatory response considerably different from what happens in the tissues. Furthermore, in open wound model, inflammation is differentially controlled by iNOS and TGF Beta-1. Therefore, abnormal wound healing conditions could be treated by pharmacological intervention using nitric oxide (NO) and TGF Beta-1 modulators.","PeriodicalId":15528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cytology and Histology","volume":"128 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immunohistochemical Characterization of the Inflammatory Responses in Wound Healing and the Use of the Subcutaneous Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) Sponge Implantation for Evaluation of the Healing Process\",\"authors\":\"S. A. El-Aleem, A. Muftah, E. Jude\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2157-7099.1000519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Biologic and synthetic biomaterials have been used for various medical applications and research studies. Subcutaneous implantation of Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) sponge is a commonly used experimental model to study the underlying mechanisms of wound healing. As a research tool, PVA sponge is useful for analyzing the granulation tissue formation and tissue regeneration. Hypothesis and Aims: PVA sponge model might show a different inflammatory response from the open incisional wound model because it reflects the host response to a foreign body. Thus, this study aims to characterize the inflammatory responses in the two models. Materials and Methods: Adult male albino rats were used to produce the two models of wound healing. Through a midline incision, two PVA sponges were implanted subcutaneously on each side. Two incisional dermal wounds were produced on the dorsum of each rat. At the end of the experiments, the sponges and the incisional wounds were harvested at different time points for assessing the inflammatory responses. Immunohistochemical staining was used to study the cellular localization and the profile of the inflammatory markers iNOS and TGF Beta-and Western blot analysis used to study their protein levels. Results: Immunohistochemical staining and Western blot analysis showed a distinct variability in the inflammatory responses between the two wound models. PVA sponge implantation model showed a delayed and a persistent inflammation started 3 days post-implantation and persisted as long as the sponge existed. On the other hand, the incisional wound model showed an early and a time limited response started 1 day and ended 5-7 days post-wounding. Moreover, the inflammatory mediators iNOS and TGF Beta-1 were differentially regulated in both models. While, they showed a similar profile along the time course in the PVA sponge model. They showed a differential profile in the open wound model. Conclusion: subcutaneous PVA sponge provides an ideal reproducible model for use in inflammation research. However, it may not be a reliable model for wound healing modulation studies. It elects inflammatory response considerably different from what happens in the tissues. Furthermore, in open wound model, inflammation is differentially controlled by iNOS and TGF Beta-1. Therefore, abnormal wound healing conditions could be treated by pharmacological intervention using nitric oxide (NO) and TGF Beta-1 modulators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cytology and Histology\",\"volume\":\"128 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cytology and Histology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7099.1000519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cytology and Histology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7099.1000519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:生物材料和合成生物材料已被用于各种医学应用和研究。聚乙烯醇(PVA)海绵皮下植入是研究创面愈合机制的常用实验模型。PVA海绵作为一种研究工具,可用于肉芽组织形成和组织再生的分析。假设与目的:PVA海绵模型可能与开放切口模型表现出不同的炎症反应,因为它反映了宿主对异物的反应。因此,本研究旨在表征两种模型中的炎症反应。材料与方法:采用成年雄性白化大鼠制备两种创面愈合模型。通过中线切口,在两侧皮下植入2块PVA海绵。每只大鼠背部均有2处皮肤切口。实验结束时,在不同时间点采集海绵和切口伤口,评估炎症反应。免疫组化染色研究细胞定位及炎症标志物iNOS和TGF - β谱,Western blot分析其蛋白水平。结果:免疫组织化学染色和免疫印迹分析显示两种创面模型的炎症反应有明显的差异。PVA海绵植入术模型在植入术后3 d开始出现迟发性和持续性炎症,并在海绵存在期间持续存在。另一方面,切口创面模型在伤后1天开始,5-7天结束,表现出较早且有时间限制的反应。此外,炎症介质iNOS和TGF β -1在两种模型中均有差异调节。然而,他们在PVA海绵模型中显示了类似的时间过程。他们在开放性伤口模型中表现出不同的特征。结论:皮下PVA海绵为炎症研究提供了理想的可重复性模型。然而,它可能不是伤口愈合调节研究的可靠模型。它选择的炎症反应与组织中发生的反应大不相同。此外,在开放性创面模型中,iNOS和TGF - β -1对炎症的控制存在差异。因此,利用一氧化氮(NO)和TGF β -1调节剂进行药物干预,可以治疗创面愈合异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immunohistochemical Characterization of the Inflammatory Responses in Wound Healing and the Use of the Subcutaneous Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) Sponge Implantation for Evaluation of the Healing Process
Background: Biologic and synthetic biomaterials have been used for various medical applications and research studies. Subcutaneous implantation of Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) sponge is a commonly used experimental model to study the underlying mechanisms of wound healing. As a research tool, PVA sponge is useful for analyzing the granulation tissue formation and tissue regeneration. Hypothesis and Aims: PVA sponge model might show a different inflammatory response from the open incisional wound model because it reflects the host response to a foreign body. Thus, this study aims to characterize the inflammatory responses in the two models. Materials and Methods: Adult male albino rats were used to produce the two models of wound healing. Through a midline incision, two PVA sponges were implanted subcutaneously on each side. Two incisional dermal wounds were produced on the dorsum of each rat. At the end of the experiments, the sponges and the incisional wounds were harvested at different time points for assessing the inflammatory responses. Immunohistochemical staining was used to study the cellular localization and the profile of the inflammatory markers iNOS and TGF Beta-and Western blot analysis used to study their protein levels. Results: Immunohistochemical staining and Western blot analysis showed a distinct variability in the inflammatory responses between the two wound models. PVA sponge implantation model showed a delayed and a persistent inflammation started 3 days post-implantation and persisted as long as the sponge existed. On the other hand, the incisional wound model showed an early and a time limited response started 1 day and ended 5-7 days post-wounding. Moreover, the inflammatory mediators iNOS and TGF Beta-1 were differentially regulated in both models. While, they showed a similar profile along the time course in the PVA sponge model. They showed a differential profile in the open wound model. Conclusion: subcutaneous PVA sponge provides an ideal reproducible model for use in inflammation research. However, it may not be a reliable model for wound healing modulation studies. It elects inflammatory response considerably different from what happens in the tissues. Furthermore, in open wound model, inflammation is differentially controlled by iNOS and TGF Beta-1. Therefore, abnormal wound healing conditions could be treated by pharmacological intervention using nitric oxide (NO) and TGF Beta-1 modulators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信