Niken Thalia Ayupradani, Endah Riski Kartini, Syahwa Minastiti, D. Pratiwi
{"title":"在@FIERSABESARI的推特评论栏中,人们对使用公民语言的顶尖性侵犯","authors":"Niken Thalia Ayupradani, Endah Riski Kartini, Syahwa Minastiti, D. Pratiwi","doi":"10.25134/fon.v18i1.4486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Politeness in language is actually close to everyday life. Now, coupled with advances in technology, it is easier for people to establish communication. Communication relations can run well if they prioritize the principle of politeness. The principle of politeness can always be upheld both speaking in social media and face to face. If you do not comply with the principle of politeness, then the speech is not polite. The purpose of this study is to describe the form of speech that violates the principle of politeness in @FiersaBesari's twitter, especially in the reply column. The special tweets that were chosen were about speeches that criticized and satirized the Indonesian government. The violation of politeness is measured by the principle of unity in the form of a thimble. The research method uses data collection techniques by observing, recording, and documenting. The data analysis technique in this study used the agih method with the BUL basic technique and the extended extension technique. The results of this study describe various forms of speech that violate the principle of politeness. The thimbles that were violated were the thimble of appreciation, the thimble of consensus, and the thimble of sympathy. Of the six thimbles used to measure politeness, there were three thimbles that found violations.","PeriodicalId":34420,"journal":{"name":"Fon","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PELANGGARAN BIDAL KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA WARGANET DALAM KOLOM KOMENTAR TWITTER @FIERSABESARI\",\"authors\":\"Niken Thalia Ayupradani, Endah Riski Kartini, Syahwa Minastiti, D. Pratiwi\",\"doi\":\"10.25134/fon.v18i1.4486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Politeness in language is actually close to everyday life. Now, coupled with advances in technology, it is easier for people to establish communication. Communication relations can run well if they prioritize the principle of politeness. The principle of politeness can always be upheld both speaking in social media and face to face. If you do not comply with the principle of politeness, then the speech is not polite. The purpose of this study is to describe the form of speech that violates the principle of politeness in @FiersaBesari's twitter, especially in the reply column. The special tweets that were chosen were about speeches that criticized and satirized the Indonesian government. The violation of politeness is measured by the principle of unity in the form of a thimble. The research method uses data collection techniques by observing, recording, and documenting. The data analysis technique in this study used the agih method with the BUL basic technique and the extended extension technique. The results of this study describe various forms of speech that violate the principle of politeness. The thimbles that were violated were the thimble of appreciation, the thimble of consensus, and the thimble of sympathy. Of the six thimbles used to measure politeness, there were three thimbles that found violations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fon\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25134/fon.v18i1.4486\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25134/fon.v18i1.4486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
PELANGGARAN BIDAL KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA WARGANET DALAM KOLOM KOMENTAR TWITTER @FIERSABESARI
: Politeness in language is actually close to everyday life. Now, coupled with advances in technology, it is easier for people to establish communication. Communication relations can run well if they prioritize the principle of politeness. The principle of politeness can always be upheld both speaking in social media and face to face. If you do not comply with the principle of politeness, then the speech is not polite. The purpose of this study is to describe the form of speech that violates the principle of politeness in @FiersaBesari's twitter, especially in the reply column. The special tweets that were chosen were about speeches that criticized and satirized the Indonesian government. The violation of politeness is measured by the principle of unity in the form of a thimble. The research method uses data collection techniques by observing, recording, and documenting. The data analysis technique in this study used the agih method with the BUL basic technique and the extended extension technique. The results of this study describe various forms of speech that violate the principle of politeness. The thimbles that were violated were the thimble of appreciation, the thimble of consensus, and the thimble of sympathy. Of the six thimbles used to measure politeness, there were three thimbles that found violations.