Prisciane Raupp da Rosa , Adelar Fochezatto , Giácomo Balbinotto Neto , Eduardo Rodrigues Sanguinet
{"title":"社会保护与COVID-19:评估巴西紧急援助政策的区域影响","authors":"Prisciane Raupp da Rosa , Adelar Fochezatto , Giácomo Balbinotto Neto , Eduardo Rodrigues Sanguinet","doi":"10.1016/j.econ.2021.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The new Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19), which began in late 2019 in China, lead to a health and economic crisis of significant proportions. The decrease in economic activity in order to prevent further spread of the disease affected all economic sectors, resulting in the unprecedented loss of jobs and the weakening of the informal economy. The Emergency Aid (EA) was created with the purpose of guaranteeing a subsistence income, minimizing the economic problems brought about by the pandemic. The aim of this paper is to analyze the direct and indirect impacts of the EA income transfers on the economy of Brazilian states. Of particular interest is to assess the distribution of indirect impacts as there may be spillovers of income between regions because of inter-sector relations and production chains. Thus, given the differences in production structures, the accounting of indirect impacts can result in a structure of regional distribution of benefits that is quite different from the initial one. The aim of this study is to assess which regions are relatively more benefited by comparing the initial structure of the distribution of the EA benefits with the final structure, after accounting for the spillovers. To do so, an interregional input-output model developed by Haddad et al. (2017) and data from the Brazilian Transparency Portal (<em>Portal da Transparência</em>) on resources allocated by the EA in the period from April to August 2020 were used. The results show that the states that benefited most in the initial distribution of the EA are the relatively most populous and poorest (Northeast) and the most benefited in the final distribution are those with more complex and relatively more developed productive structures (Southeast and South).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100389,"journal":{"name":"EconomiA","volume":"22 3","pages":"Pages 239-250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1517758021000254/pdfft?md5=60f70959d30e389e9f6244fdf510534b&pid=1-s2.0-S1517758021000254-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social protection and COVID-19: Evaluation of regional impacts of the Emergency Aid policy in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Prisciane Raupp da Rosa , Adelar Fochezatto , Giácomo Balbinotto Neto , Eduardo Rodrigues Sanguinet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econ.2021.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The new Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19), which began in late 2019 in China, lead to a health and economic crisis of significant proportions. The decrease in economic activity in order to prevent further spread of the disease affected all economic sectors, resulting in the unprecedented loss of jobs and the weakening of the informal economy. The Emergency Aid (EA) was created with the purpose of guaranteeing a subsistence income, minimizing the economic problems brought about by the pandemic. The aim of this paper is to analyze the direct and indirect impacts of the EA income transfers on the economy of Brazilian states. Of particular interest is to assess the distribution of indirect impacts as there may be spillovers of income between regions because of inter-sector relations and production chains. Thus, given the differences in production structures, the accounting of indirect impacts can result in a structure of regional distribution of benefits that is quite different from the initial one. The aim of this study is to assess which regions are relatively more benefited by comparing the initial structure of the distribution of the EA benefits with the final structure, after accounting for the spillovers. To do so, an interregional input-output model developed by Haddad et al. (2017) and data from the Brazilian Transparency Portal (<em>Portal da Transparência</em>) on resources allocated by the EA in the period from April to August 2020 were used. The results show that the states that benefited most in the initial distribution of the EA are the relatively most populous and poorest (Northeast) and the most benefited in the final distribution are those with more complex and relatively more developed productive structures (Southeast and South).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EconomiA\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 239-250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1517758021000254/pdfft?md5=60f70959d30e389e9f6244fdf510534b&pid=1-s2.0-S1517758021000254-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EconomiA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1517758021000254\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EconomiA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1517758021000254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
2019年底在中国开始的新型冠状病毒大流行(COVID-19)导致了严重的健康和经济危机。为防止疾病进一步蔓延而减少经济活动影响到所有经济部门,造成前所未有的失业和非正规经济的削弱。设立紧急援助的目的是保证维持生计的收入,尽量减少这种流行病带来的经济问题。本文的目的是分析EA收入转移对巴西各州经济的直接和间接影响。特别感兴趣的是评估间接影响的分布,因为由于部门间关系和生产链,区域之间可能存在收入溢出效应。因此,考虑到生产结构的差异,对间接影响的核算可能导致与最初的利益分配结构大不相同的区域利益分配结构。本研究的目的是在考虑溢出效应后,通过比较东亚地区利益分配的初始结构和最终结构,评估哪些地区相对更受益。为此,使用了Haddad等人(2017)开发的区域间投入产出模型和巴西透明度门户网站(Portal da Transparência)关于2020年4月至8月期间EA分配资源的数据。结果表明:在初始分布中受益最大的是人口相对最多和最贫困的地区(东北),在最终分布中受益最大的是生产结构相对复杂和较发达的地区(东南和南方)。
Social protection and COVID-19: Evaluation of regional impacts of the Emergency Aid policy in Brazil
The new Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19), which began in late 2019 in China, lead to a health and economic crisis of significant proportions. The decrease in economic activity in order to prevent further spread of the disease affected all economic sectors, resulting in the unprecedented loss of jobs and the weakening of the informal economy. The Emergency Aid (EA) was created with the purpose of guaranteeing a subsistence income, minimizing the economic problems brought about by the pandemic. The aim of this paper is to analyze the direct and indirect impacts of the EA income transfers on the economy of Brazilian states. Of particular interest is to assess the distribution of indirect impacts as there may be spillovers of income between regions because of inter-sector relations and production chains. Thus, given the differences in production structures, the accounting of indirect impacts can result in a structure of regional distribution of benefits that is quite different from the initial one. The aim of this study is to assess which regions are relatively more benefited by comparing the initial structure of the distribution of the EA benefits with the final structure, after accounting for the spillovers. To do so, an interregional input-output model developed by Haddad et al. (2017) and data from the Brazilian Transparency Portal (Portal da Transparência) on resources allocated by the EA in the period from April to August 2020 were used. The results show that the states that benefited most in the initial distribution of the EA are the relatively most populous and poorest (Northeast) and the most benefited in the final distribution are those with more complex and relatively more developed productive structures (Southeast and South).