液体氧化还原过程的化学演化

D. Deberry
{"title":"液体氧化还原过程的化学演化","authors":"D. Deberry","doi":"10.1002/EP.3300160316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A multitude of processes have been proposed for removal of hydrogen sulfide from gaseous streams. Removal of H 2 S from sour natural gas streams is particularly difficult since low outlet concentrations must be reached before the gas is put into a pipeline. Liquid redox sulfur recovery (LRSR) processes use a solution containing an oxidizing agent that absorbs H 2 S from the gas stream and oxidizes it to sulfur. The chemistry of these processes has undergone considerable evolution in the last 30 years. A number of tradeoffs must be considered in designing LRSR processes. For example, the rate of reaction of the oxidized agent with H 2 S often determines the scrubbing efficiency, but excessive rates of sulfur formation in the scrubber can lead to plugging. Systems based on vanadium and/or anthraquinone disulfonates (ADA) as the redox catalyst had several drawbacks, most of which can be traced to sluggish redox agent kinetics. Current LRSR processes use chelated iron as the catalyst for sulfur recovery. This gives faster scrubbing and re-oxidation kinetics, but chemical degradation of the chelating agent can affect the economics of the process. Plugging of sorption vessels continues to be a problem in some applications. New nonaqueous solvent-based or biological processes may overcome these problems.","PeriodicalId":11769,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Progress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chemical evolution of liquid redox processes\",\"authors\":\"D. Deberry\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/EP.3300160316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A multitude of processes have been proposed for removal of hydrogen sulfide from gaseous streams. Removal of H 2 S from sour natural gas streams is particularly difficult since low outlet concentrations must be reached before the gas is put into a pipeline. Liquid redox sulfur recovery (LRSR) processes use a solution containing an oxidizing agent that absorbs H 2 S from the gas stream and oxidizes it to sulfur. The chemistry of these processes has undergone considerable evolution in the last 30 years. A number of tradeoffs must be considered in designing LRSR processes. For example, the rate of reaction of the oxidized agent with H 2 S often determines the scrubbing efficiency, but excessive rates of sulfur formation in the scrubber can lead to plugging. Systems based on vanadium and/or anthraquinone disulfonates (ADA) as the redox catalyst had several drawbacks, most of which can be traced to sluggish redox agent kinetics. Current LRSR processes use chelated iron as the catalyst for sulfur recovery. This gives faster scrubbing and re-oxidation kinetics, but chemical degradation of the chelating agent can affect the economics of the process. Plugging of sorption vessels continues to be a problem in some applications. New nonaqueous solvent-based or biological processes may overcome these problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Progress\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/EP.3300160316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/EP.3300160316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

已经提出了许多从气体流中去除硫化氢的方法。从含硫天然气流中去除硫化氢尤为困难,因为在气体进入管道之前,必须达到较低的出口浓度。液体氧化还原硫回收(LRSR)过程使用含有氧化剂的溶液,该氧化剂从气流中吸收h2s并将其氧化为硫。这些过程的化学性质在过去30年里经历了相当大的演变。在设计LRSR过程时必须考虑许多权衡。例如,氧化剂与h2s的反应速率通常决定了洗涤效率,但洗涤器中硫的形成速率过高会导致堵塞。基于钒和/或蒽醌二磺酸盐(ADA)作为氧化还原催化剂的系统有几个缺点,其中大部分可以追溯到氧化还原剂动力学缓慢。目前的LRSR工艺使用螯合铁作为硫回收的催化剂。这样可以加快洗涤和再氧化动力学,但螯合剂的化学降解会影响该过程的经济性。在一些应用中,吸附容器的堵塞仍然是一个问题。新的非水溶剂或生物工艺可以克服这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chemical evolution of liquid redox processes
A multitude of processes have been proposed for removal of hydrogen sulfide from gaseous streams. Removal of H 2 S from sour natural gas streams is particularly difficult since low outlet concentrations must be reached before the gas is put into a pipeline. Liquid redox sulfur recovery (LRSR) processes use a solution containing an oxidizing agent that absorbs H 2 S from the gas stream and oxidizes it to sulfur. The chemistry of these processes has undergone considerable evolution in the last 30 years. A number of tradeoffs must be considered in designing LRSR processes. For example, the rate of reaction of the oxidized agent with H 2 S often determines the scrubbing efficiency, but excessive rates of sulfur formation in the scrubber can lead to plugging. Systems based on vanadium and/or anthraquinone disulfonates (ADA) as the redox catalyst had several drawbacks, most of which can be traced to sluggish redox agent kinetics. Current LRSR processes use chelated iron as the catalyst for sulfur recovery. This gives faster scrubbing and re-oxidation kinetics, but chemical degradation of the chelating agent can affect the economics of the process. Plugging of sorption vessels continues to be a problem in some applications. New nonaqueous solvent-based or biological processes may overcome these problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信