强化法语和强化英语:异同。

IF 0.5 3区 文学 Q3 LINGUISTICS
C. Germain, P. Lightbown, J. Netten, N. Spada
{"title":"强化法语和强化英语:异同。","authors":"C. Germain, P. Lightbown, J. Netten, N. Spada","doi":"10.3138/CMLR.60.3.409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a historical overview and comparison of intensive English (IE) and intensive French (IF) programs in Canada. Comparisons are made in terms of the total time allotted to the intensive period, the selection of students, the number and types of schools offering the programs, the models of delivery, and the type of pedagogy and curricula. The programs are also compared in terms of learning outcomes, follow-up programs, and teacher preparation/qualifications. Reasons for the success of both programs are given and discussed in relation to the rationales for their existence. In general, the programs appear to be very similar; major differences present in IF include the compacting of the regular curriculum, the role of reading and writing, the emphasis on both accuracy and fluency, and the use of more cognitively demanding tasks.","PeriodicalId":47109,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Modern Language Review-Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2004-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intensive French and Intensive English: Similarities and Differences.\",\"authors\":\"C. Germain, P. Lightbown, J. Netten, N. Spada\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/CMLR.60.3.409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article provides a historical overview and comparison of intensive English (IE) and intensive French (IF) programs in Canada. Comparisons are made in terms of the total time allotted to the intensive period, the selection of students, the number and types of schools offering the programs, the models of delivery, and the type of pedagogy and curricula. The programs are also compared in terms of learning outcomes, follow-up programs, and teacher preparation/qualifications. Reasons for the success of both programs are given and discussed in relation to the rationales for their existence. In general, the programs appear to be very similar; major differences present in IF include the compacting of the regular curriculum, the role of reading and writing, the emphasis on both accuracy and fluency, and the use of more cognitively demanding tasks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Modern Language Review-Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Modern Language Review-Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/CMLR.60.3.409\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Modern Language Review-Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/CMLR.60.3.409","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

本文介绍了加拿大英语强化课程(IE)和法语强化课程(IF)的历史概况和比较。比较的标准包括:分配给强化课程的总时间、学生的选择、提供课程的学校的数量和类型、教学模式以及教学法和课程的类型。这些项目还在学习成果、后续项目和教师准备/资格方面进行了比较。本文给出并讨论了这两个项目成功的原因,以及它们存在的基本原理。总的来说,这些程序看起来非常相似;IF的主要差异包括常规课程的紧凑性、阅读和写作的作用、对准确性和流畅性的强调,以及对认知要求更高的任务的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intensive French and Intensive English: Similarities and Differences.
This article provides a historical overview and comparison of intensive English (IE) and intensive French (IF) programs in Canada. Comparisons are made in terms of the total time allotted to the intensive period, the selection of students, the number and types of schools offering the programs, the models of delivery, and the type of pedagogy and curricula. The programs are also compared in terms of learning outcomes, follow-up programs, and teacher preparation/qualifications. Reasons for the success of both programs are given and discussed in relation to the rationales for their existence. In general, the programs appear to be very similar; major differences present in IF include the compacting of the regular curriculum, the role of reading and writing, the emphasis on both accuracy and fluency, and the use of more cognitively demanding tasks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: During the more than 60 years of its existence, The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes has evolved from an Ontario-centered journal containing mainly classroom-based teaching strategies and resources to a Canada-wide, bilingual, refereed scholarly publication of national scope and international repute. The CMLR/RCLV serves members of the teaching profession, administrators and researchers interested in all levels of English and French as second languages and, in addition, those interested in native and other modern, international, or heritage language programs and issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信