绩效评估中的个人和系统效应:作为绩效责任和错误程度的函数的评级

Robert L. Cardy, Cynthia L. Sutton, Kenneth P. Carson, Gregory H. Dobbins
{"title":"绩效评估中的个人和系统效应:作为绩效责任和错误程度的函数的评级","authors":"Robert L. Cardy,&nbsp;Cynthia L. Sutton,&nbsp;Kenneth P. Carson,&nbsp;Gregory H. Dobbins","doi":"10.1016/S1084-8568(99)80105-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Performance ratings were examined as a function of person and system effects on ratee performance. Degree of responsibility for production of various parts, as well as levels of productivity, system produced error, and person produced error were manipulated in two studies. Findings were substantially similar across the two studies. In each study, ratings were found to be lower when the ratee had greater responsibility for production than did the system. The responsibility effect in each study depended on the level of productivity, with system responsibility yielding higher ratings than person responsibility under the low productivity condition, but not under the high productivity condition. Implications of the findings for appraisal and performance management are considered. Possible future research directions and the importance of understanding person and system effects on ratees and raters are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Quality Management","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 79-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1084-8568(99)80105-9","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Person and system effects in performance appraisal: Ratings as a function of the degree of performance responsibility and errorfulness\",\"authors\":\"Robert L. Cardy,&nbsp;Cynthia L. Sutton,&nbsp;Kenneth P. Carson,&nbsp;Gregory H. Dobbins\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1084-8568(99)80105-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Performance ratings were examined as a function of person and system effects on ratee performance. Degree of responsibility for production of various parts, as well as levels of productivity, system produced error, and person produced error were manipulated in two studies. Findings were substantially similar across the two studies. In each study, ratings were found to be lower when the ratee had greater responsibility for production than did the system. The responsibility effect in each study depended on the level of productivity, with system responsibility yielding higher ratings than person responsibility under the low productivity condition, but not under the high productivity condition. Implications of the findings for appraisal and performance management are considered. Possible future research directions and the importance of understanding person and system effects on ratees and raters are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Quality Management\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 79-99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1084-8568(99)80105-9\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Quality Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084856899801059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Quality Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084856899801059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

绩效评级作为个人和系统对绩效影响的函数进行了检验。在两项研究中,对生产各种零件的责任程度,以及生产率水平、系统产生的误差和人员产生的误差进行了操纵。这两项研究的结果基本相似。在每项研究中,当比率比系统对生产负有更大的责任时,评级就会降低。各研究中的责任效应取决于生产率水平,在低生产率条件下,制度责任的评分高于个人责任,而在高生产率条件下,则不高于个人责任。审议了调查结果对考评和业绩管理的影响。讨论了未来可能的研究方向,以及理解个人和系统对费率和评分者的影响的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Person and system effects in performance appraisal: Ratings as a function of the degree of performance responsibility and errorfulness

Performance ratings were examined as a function of person and system effects on ratee performance. Degree of responsibility for production of various parts, as well as levels of productivity, system produced error, and person produced error were manipulated in two studies. Findings were substantially similar across the two studies. In each study, ratings were found to be lower when the ratee had greater responsibility for production than did the system. The responsibility effect in each study depended on the level of productivity, with system responsibility yielding higher ratings than person responsibility under the low productivity condition, but not under the high productivity condition. Implications of the findings for appraisal and performance management are considered. Possible future research directions and the importance of understanding person and system effects on ratees and raters are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信