口腔内有无病变的念珠菌:蜂胶和周精的最大抑制稀释

R. V. Azevedo, M. Komesu, R. C. Cândido, C. Salvetti, F. H. C. Rezende
{"title":"口腔内有无病变的念珠菌:蜂胶和周精的最大抑制稀释","authors":"R. V. Azevedo, M. Komesu, R. C. Cândido, C. Salvetti, F. H. C. Rezende","doi":"10.1590/S0001-37141999000400008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fifty individuals of both sexes aged on average 45.2 years were evaluated at the Semiology Clinic of FORP-USP in order to isolate and identify yeasts from the oral cavity, with and without lesions, and to determine the maximal inhibitory dilution (MID) of the commercial products Propolis (Apis-Flora) and Periogard (Colgate) against the strains isolated. Yeasts of the genus Candida were detected in the saliva of 9/19 (47.4%) individuals with a clinically healthy mouth, 18/22 (81.8%) of individuals with oral lesions, and in 4/9 (44.4%) of patients with deviation from normality, and were detected in 19/22 (86.4%) of the lesions. In the group with oral candidiasis, we isolated in tongue and lesion, respectively for each specie: C.tropicalis (8% and 10.7%), C.glabrata (4% and 3.6%) and C.parapsilosis (2% and 3.6%), in addition to C.albicans (71.4% and 67.8%) as the only species and the prevalent. The total cfu counts/ml saliva showed a higher mean value in the group with oral candidiasis (171.5% x 103) than in the control group (72.6 x 103) or the group with abnormalities (8.3 x 103). Most of the test strains 67/70 (95.71%) were sensitive to the antiseptics, with Propolis presenting a MID of 1:20 for 54/70/77.1%), and Periogard a MID of 1:160 for 42/70 (60%) strains from healthy sites, results similar to those obtained with strains from oral lesions. Different results were mainly observed among different species. The results indicate the possibility of using the antiseptics Propolis and Periogard (chlorhexidine) for the prevention and treatment of oral candidiasis.","PeriodicalId":21211,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Microbiologia","volume":"21 1","pages":"335-341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Candida sp in the oral cavity with and without lesions: maximal inhibitory dilution of Propolis and Periogard\",\"authors\":\"R. V. Azevedo, M. Komesu, R. C. Cândido, C. Salvetti, F. H. C. Rezende\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S0001-37141999000400008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fifty individuals of both sexes aged on average 45.2 years were evaluated at the Semiology Clinic of FORP-USP in order to isolate and identify yeasts from the oral cavity, with and without lesions, and to determine the maximal inhibitory dilution (MID) of the commercial products Propolis (Apis-Flora) and Periogard (Colgate) against the strains isolated. Yeasts of the genus Candida were detected in the saliva of 9/19 (47.4%) individuals with a clinically healthy mouth, 18/22 (81.8%) of individuals with oral lesions, and in 4/9 (44.4%) of patients with deviation from normality, and were detected in 19/22 (86.4%) of the lesions. In the group with oral candidiasis, we isolated in tongue and lesion, respectively for each specie: C.tropicalis (8% and 10.7%), C.glabrata (4% and 3.6%) and C.parapsilosis (2% and 3.6%), in addition to C.albicans (71.4% and 67.8%) as the only species and the prevalent. The total cfu counts/ml saliva showed a higher mean value in the group with oral candidiasis (171.5% x 103) than in the control group (72.6 x 103) or the group with abnormalities (8.3 x 103). Most of the test strains 67/70 (95.71%) were sensitive to the antiseptics, with Propolis presenting a MID of 1:20 for 54/70/77.1%), and Periogard a MID of 1:160 for 42/70 (60%) strains from healthy sites, results similar to those obtained with strains from oral lesions. Different results were mainly observed among different species. The results indicate the possibility of using the antiseptics Propolis and Periogard (chlorhexidine) for the prevention and treatment of oral candidiasis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista De Microbiologia\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"335-341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista De Microbiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37141999000400008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Microbiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37141999000400008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

在FORP-USP符会学诊所对50名平均年龄为45.2岁的男女进行了评估,以分离和鉴定口腔中有和没有病变的酵母,并确定商业产品蜂胶(Apis-Flora)和Periogard(高露洁)对分离菌株的最大抑制稀释(MID)。临床口腔健康者19例(47.4%)、口腔病变者18例(81.8%)、口腔异常者4例(44.4%)、口腔病变者19例(86.4%)的唾液中检出念珠菌。在口腔念珠菌感染组中,我们分别在舌部和病变处分离出了热带念珠菌(8%和10.7%)、光滑念珠菌(4%和3.6%)和拟裂念珠菌(2%和3.6%),白色念珠菌(71.4%和67.8%)是唯一的菌种,也是最常见的。口腔念珠菌病组cfu总数/ml唾液平均值(171.5% × 103)高于对照组(72.6 × 103)或异常组(8.3 × 103)。大多数67/70(95.71%)菌株对防腐剂敏感,其中健康部位的蜂胶(54/70/77.1%)的MID为1:20,42/70(60%)的Periogard a的MID为1:160,结果与口腔病变部位的菌株相似。不同树种间主要观察到不同的结果。结果表明,蜂胶和氯己定两种防腐剂预防和治疗口腔念珠菌病是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Candida sp in the oral cavity with and without lesions: maximal inhibitory dilution of Propolis and Periogard
Fifty individuals of both sexes aged on average 45.2 years were evaluated at the Semiology Clinic of FORP-USP in order to isolate and identify yeasts from the oral cavity, with and without lesions, and to determine the maximal inhibitory dilution (MID) of the commercial products Propolis (Apis-Flora) and Periogard (Colgate) against the strains isolated. Yeasts of the genus Candida were detected in the saliva of 9/19 (47.4%) individuals with a clinically healthy mouth, 18/22 (81.8%) of individuals with oral lesions, and in 4/9 (44.4%) of patients with deviation from normality, and were detected in 19/22 (86.4%) of the lesions. In the group with oral candidiasis, we isolated in tongue and lesion, respectively for each specie: C.tropicalis (8% and 10.7%), C.glabrata (4% and 3.6%) and C.parapsilosis (2% and 3.6%), in addition to C.albicans (71.4% and 67.8%) as the only species and the prevalent. The total cfu counts/ml saliva showed a higher mean value in the group with oral candidiasis (171.5% x 103) than in the control group (72.6 x 103) or the group with abnormalities (8.3 x 103). Most of the test strains 67/70 (95.71%) were sensitive to the antiseptics, with Propolis presenting a MID of 1:20 for 54/70/77.1%), and Periogard a MID of 1:160 for 42/70 (60%) strains from healthy sites, results similar to those obtained with strains from oral lesions. Different results were mainly observed among different species. The results indicate the possibility of using the antiseptics Propolis and Periogard (chlorhexidine) for the prevention and treatment of oral candidiasis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信