玻璃体内注射雷尼单抗治疗视网膜中央静脉阻塞黄斑水肿后的黄斑敏感性:1次与3次初始每月注射

Erina Niidome, H. Noma, K. Yasuda, Kosei Yanagida, Akitomo Narimatsu, Masaki Asakage, Sho Watarai, H. Goto, M. Shimura
{"title":"玻璃体内注射雷尼单抗治疗视网膜中央静脉阻塞黄斑水肿后的黄斑敏感性:1次与3次初始每月注射","authors":"Erina Niidome, H. Noma, K. Yasuda, Kosei Yanagida, Akitomo Narimatsu, Masaki Asakage, Sho Watarai, H. Goto, M. Shimura","doi":"10.3390/jvd1010006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: We aimed to compare the macular sensitivity after one initial intravitreal injection of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent followed by pro re nata (PRN) dosing with that after three initial monthly injections followed by PRN dosing in patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and macular edema. Methods: We included 20 eyes of 20 patients with treatment-naïve macular edema in CRVO and followed them for 12 months after intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IRI). Before and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after IRI, macular sensitivity within the central 1 mm, 3 mm, and 6 mm fields was measured with an MP3 microperimeter and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed. Eleven eyes received one initial IRI (1 + PRN group), and nine received three initial monthly IRIs (3 + PRN group). PRN injections were performed when fovea exudative changes were evident. Results: Mean macular sensitivity within the central 1 mm, 3 mm, and 6 mm fields significantly improved from baseline to month 12 in all treated eyes. We found no significant differences in macular sensitivity in the central 1 mm, 3 mm, or 6 mm fields between the two groups at month 1, 3, 6, or 12. The choice of treatment regimen (1 + PRN or 3 + PRN) showed no association with either macular sensitivity in the central 1 mm, 3 mm, and 6 mm fields or BCVA at month 12. Conclusions: These findings suggest that a 1 + PRN regimen improves macular sensitivity to a similar extent as a 3 + PRN regimen.","PeriodicalId":74009,"journal":{"name":"Journal of vascular diseases","volume":"290 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Macular Sensitivity after Intravitreal Ranibizumab Injection for Macular Edema in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: One Versus Three Initial Monthly Injections\",\"authors\":\"Erina Niidome, H. Noma, K. Yasuda, Kosei Yanagida, Akitomo Narimatsu, Masaki Asakage, Sho Watarai, H. Goto, M. Shimura\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jvd1010006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: We aimed to compare the macular sensitivity after one initial intravitreal injection of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent followed by pro re nata (PRN) dosing with that after three initial monthly injections followed by PRN dosing in patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and macular edema. Methods: We included 20 eyes of 20 patients with treatment-naïve macular edema in CRVO and followed them for 12 months after intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IRI). Before and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after IRI, macular sensitivity within the central 1 mm, 3 mm, and 6 mm fields was measured with an MP3 microperimeter and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed. Eleven eyes received one initial IRI (1 + PRN group), and nine received three initial monthly IRIs (3 + PRN group). PRN injections were performed when fovea exudative changes were evident. Results: Mean macular sensitivity within the central 1 mm, 3 mm, and 6 mm fields significantly improved from baseline to month 12 in all treated eyes. We found no significant differences in macular sensitivity in the central 1 mm, 3 mm, or 6 mm fields between the two groups at month 1, 3, 6, or 12. The choice of treatment regimen (1 + PRN or 3 + PRN) showed no association with either macular sensitivity in the central 1 mm, 3 mm, and 6 mm fields or BCVA at month 12. Conclusions: These findings suggest that a 1 + PRN regimen improves macular sensitivity to a similar extent as a 3 + PRN regimen.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of vascular diseases\",\"volume\":\"290 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of vascular diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jvd1010006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of vascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jvd1010006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们的目的是比较在视网膜中央静脉阻塞(CRVO)和黄斑水肿患者中,一次初始玻璃体内注射抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)药物后再给药(PRN)与三次初始每月注射后再给药(PRN)的黄斑敏感性。方法:选取20例患有treatment-naïve黄斑水肿的CRVO患者20只眼,玻璃体内注射雷尼单抗(IRI)后随访12个月。IRI前、IRI后1、3、6和12个月,用MP3微周长测量中心1mm、3mm和6mm视场内的黄斑灵敏度,并评估最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。11只眼接受1次初始IRI (1 + PRN组),9只眼接受3次初始IRI (3 + PRN组)。当中央窝渗出改变明显时,进行PRN注射。结果:从基线到第12个月,所有治疗的眼睛在中心1mm, 3mm和6mm范围内的平均黄斑灵敏度显著提高。我们发现在第1、3、6或12个月时,两组之间黄斑中心1mm、3mm或6mm区域的敏感性没有显著差异。治疗方案(1 + PRN或3 + PRN)的选择与第12个月时中央1mm, 3mm和6mm视野的黄斑敏感性或BCVA无关。结论:这些发现表明,1 + PRN方案改善黄斑敏感性的程度与3 + PRN方案相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Macular Sensitivity after Intravitreal Ranibizumab Injection for Macular Edema in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: One Versus Three Initial Monthly Injections
Background: We aimed to compare the macular sensitivity after one initial intravitreal injection of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent followed by pro re nata (PRN) dosing with that after three initial monthly injections followed by PRN dosing in patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and macular edema. Methods: We included 20 eyes of 20 patients with treatment-naïve macular edema in CRVO and followed them for 12 months after intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IRI). Before and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after IRI, macular sensitivity within the central 1 mm, 3 mm, and 6 mm fields was measured with an MP3 microperimeter and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed. Eleven eyes received one initial IRI (1 + PRN group), and nine received three initial monthly IRIs (3 + PRN group). PRN injections were performed when fovea exudative changes were evident. Results: Mean macular sensitivity within the central 1 mm, 3 mm, and 6 mm fields significantly improved from baseline to month 12 in all treated eyes. We found no significant differences in macular sensitivity in the central 1 mm, 3 mm, or 6 mm fields between the two groups at month 1, 3, 6, or 12. The choice of treatment regimen (1 + PRN or 3 + PRN) showed no association with either macular sensitivity in the central 1 mm, 3 mm, and 6 mm fields or BCVA at month 12. Conclusions: These findings suggest that a 1 + PRN regimen improves macular sensitivity to a similar extent as a 3 + PRN regimen.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信