遗产即过程:当代社会科学与人文科学中的文化遗产概念

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
A. Kolesnik, A. Rusanov
{"title":"遗产即过程:当代社会科学与人文科学中的文化遗产概念","authors":"A. Kolesnik, A. Rusanov","doi":"10.17072/2219-3111-2022-3-58-69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large-scale transformations in social sciences and the Humanities in the 1960 and 1970s (such as the emergence of cultural studies, memory studies, postcolonial studies and gender studies, public history, etc.) influenced the formation of heritage studies in the 1980s. Within the framework of this field, the concept of heritage has been substantially revised: it began to cover the sphere of the ordinary and everyday; its temporal boundaries have changed, so the objects related to the recent past began to be considered as heritage; the idea of de-monopolization of state experts in determining heritage was proposed. In the 2000s, a separate area of critical heritage studies emerged within heritage studies. Its purpose was to study the discursive practices of defining and using heritage, used primarily by the state and international institutions (the so-called “authorized heritage discourse”, AHD, proposed by a theorist Laurajane Smith); as well as the problematization of heritage as a process of constant rethinking and redefining of identities and cultural values, which involves different social groups, communities and agents. The paper examines the transformation of the understanding of heritage-as-an-object into heritage as a social action and heritage-as-process discussed in heritage studies and critical heritage studies in European countries. It presents an overview of the key stages of their development and subsequent changes, the main research issues and problems, as well as their current debates.","PeriodicalId":41257,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HERITAGE-AS-PROCESS: THE CONCEPT OF CULTURAL HERITAGE IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES\",\"authors\":\"A. Kolesnik, A. Rusanov\",\"doi\":\"10.17072/2219-3111-2022-3-58-69\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Large-scale transformations in social sciences and the Humanities in the 1960 and 1970s (such as the emergence of cultural studies, memory studies, postcolonial studies and gender studies, public history, etc.) influenced the formation of heritage studies in the 1980s. Within the framework of this field, the concept of heritage has been substantially revised: it began to cover the sphere of the ordinary and everyday; its temporal boundaries have changed, so the objects related to the recent past began to be considered as heritage; the idea of de-monopolization of state experts in determining heritage was proposed. In the 2000s, a separate area of critical heritage studies emerged within heritage studies. Its purpose was to study the discursive practices of defining and using heritage, used primarily by the state and international institutions (the so-called “authorized heritage discourse”, AHD, proposed by a theorist Laurajane Smith); as well as the problematization of heritage as a process of constant rethinking and redefining of identities and cultural values, which involves different social groups, communities and agents. The paper examines the transformation of the understanding of heritage-as-an-object into heritage as a social action and heritage-as-process discussed in heritage studies and critical heritage studies in European countries. It presents an overview of the key stages of their development and subsequent changes, the main research issues and problems, as well as their current debates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2022-3-58-69\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2022-3-58-69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

20世纪60年代和70年代社会科学和人文学科的大规模变革(如文化研究、记忆研究、后殖民研究和性别研究、公共历史等)影响了20世纪80年代遗产研究的形成。在这一领域的框架内,遗产的概念得到了实质性的修订:它开始涵盖普通和日常的领域;它的时间界限已经改变,因此与最近的过去有关的物体开始被视为遗产;提出了国家专家在确定遗产方面去垄断的想法。在2000年代,在遗产研究中出现了一个独立的批判性遗产研究领域。其目的是研究主要由国家和国际机构使用的定义和使用遗产的话语实践(所谓的“授权遗产话语”,AHD,由理论家劳拉简·史密斯提出);以及遗产的问题化,作为一个不断重新思考和重新定义身份和文化价值的过程,涉及不同的社会群体,社区和代理人。本文考察了欧洲国家遗产研究和批判遗产研究中对遗产作为客体的理解向遗产作为社会行动和遗产作为过程的理解的转变。它概述了它们发展的关键阶段和随后的变化,主要的研究问题和问题,以及它们目前的争论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
HERITAGE-AS-PROCESS: THE CONCEPT OF CULTURAL HERITAGE IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES
Large-scale transformations in social sciences and the Humanities in the 1960 and 1970s (such as the emergence of cultural studies, memory studies, postcolonial studies and gender studies, public history, etc.) influenced the formation of heritage studies in the 1980s. Within the framework of this field, the concept of heritage has been substantially revised: it began to cover the sphere of the ordinary and everyday; its temporal boundaries have changed, so the objects related to the recent past began to be considered as heritage; the idea of de-monopolization of state experts in determining heritage was proposed. In the 2000s, a separate area of critical heritage studies emerged within heritage studies. Its purpose was to study the discursive practices of defining and using heritage, used primarily by the state and international institutions (the so-called “authorized heritage discourse”, AHD, proposed by a theorist Laurajane Smith); as well as the problematization of heritage as a process of constant rethinking and redefining of identities and cultural values, which involves different social groups, communities and agents. The paper examines the transformation of the understanding of heritage-as-an-object into heritage as a social action and heritage-as-process discussed in heritage studies and critical heritage studies in European countries. It presents an overview of the key stages of their development and subsequent changes, the main research issues and problems, as well as their current debates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信