E. Serrano, J. López-Martín, C. Rosell, C. Fonseca
{"title":"21世纪的有蹄类生物、健康和管理:伊比利亚半岛的形势发生了变化","authors":"E. Serrano, J. López-Martín, C. Rosell, C. Fonseca","doi":"10.2461/WBP.2013.IBEUN.0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Long time ago, observing ungulates in the Iberian Peninsula (IP) was a privilege for few lucky people. In those days Iberian ibexes, chamois, roe deer or red deer populations were moderately abundant in some game units or present in remote areas of IP. However, currently, ungulate populations in the IP are mostly a conservation success story, as their numbers and distribution range have increased substantially over most of our territory. This extraordinary population increase has created new challenges for hunters, wildlife ecologists, veterinarians and managers. Actually, not only wild boars are now easy to sight in some cities of the IP but are responsible for certain insecurity for local residents, specially due to road traffic accidents. Today, roe deer and Iberian ibexes have significantly increased their distribution and it’s possible to see ibexes near to the shoreline and roe deer groups colonizing semi-arid and dry Mediterranean habitats. Surprisingly, the Iberian ibex is absent in some regions of the Iberian range (e.g., centre and south Portugal, or in the Pyrenees) which have triggered an intense debate between managers and researchers about the suitability for a further reintroduction. Little is known, on the other hand, about the current status of old adopted species, such as the aoudad, and we know very little about the status of groups of pot-bellied pigs and feral goats in our countries. The impact of diseases on these species and on human beings (in case of shared diseases and zoonosis) becomes, now more than ever, a very important issue because of the abundance of Iberian ungulate populations. The great conservation and management efforts and successes of the past now face a new challenge: the problem of coexistence of humans with this group of mammals. It is important that scientists, managers, hunters and administrators meet to discuss what to do in the near future. The RUSI (Reunion sobre Ungulados Silvestres Ibericos / Reuniao sobre Ungulados Silvestres Ibericos) is an Iberian forum to bring up those issues. During the last two meetings (the second edition took place on July 2011 in Aveiro, Portugal and the third on October 2013 in Girona, Spain), the following conclusions were built about two main issues: ungulate management and population monitoring (Aveiro, Portugal) and Human-ungulate conflict prevention and management. Regarding ungulate management and population monitoring, the main conclusions have been summarized in the following five points: Game managers and researchers should work towards the promotion of Game Certification, increasing awareness and understanding of a sustainable management and in accordance to the natural selection process and natural population dynamics. Small hunting states from northwest Iberian Peninsula, should work towards developing a global management plans including the management of a specific ungulate population in several states at the same time. Managers should pay attention to supplemental feeding; several studies have proved the link between this management practice and the spread of parasitic and infectious diseases. Health status of populations should be considered in any further ungulate monitoring or management plan. Their role as reservoirs for main zoonosis and other diseases shared between wildlife and livestock-wildlife is too important to ignore. Managers, hunters and unspecialized researchers should have the basic training for detecting the presence of main diseases in their respective working areas. Then, animal health authorities should be immediately informed. Population monitoring is the best support for any further management action. If we develop management plans on ungulate populations without the support of valid and reliable population censuses data, it will be very difficult to reach the management success. Concerning the third RUSI meeting, held in Girona, about conflict prevention and management of ungulate populations, the main original conclusions were the following: The increase in ungulate population numbers in peri-urban and rural areas causes a number of accidents on the roads. Specific preventive and corrective measures should be applied taking into account not only the road type, but also ungulate behaviour. In such urban areas, civic education activities against feeding ungulates should be implemented. In the countryside, ungulates are responsible for crop damages. Farmers are very worried about this and, thus, the collaboration between local environmental administrations, specialists and farmers is necessary to solve such conflicts. Such impacts on crops and the potential of ungulates as disease reservoirs should be taken into consideration in any reintroduction plan of ungulate species. Though hunting is the main method used for control of ungulate populations, new measures should be explored in case of areas where hunting is forbidden. Habitat management practices are recommended in such cases. Ungulate meat is an important food resource in the IP. We need to encourage our markets and internal consumption, but also promote the development of a legal and regulatory framework to improve and make such consume easier. As a final remark, we can assume that the conflicts and problems originated by the current ungulate population status in the Iberian Peninsula give us an excellent opportunity for applying the acquired knowledge obtained over years and to show the extent to which our society has developed. Note: Papers of the first RUSI hold in Zaragoza, Spain (September 2010), can be found in: Garcia-Gonzalez, R. & Herrero, J. (2011) Pirineos, Journal of Mountain Ecology, 166, http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/pirineos.2011.v166 .","PeriodicalId":89522,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ungulate Biology, Health and Management in the 21st century: the Tables are Turned in the Iberian Peninsula\",\"authors\":\"E. Serrano, J. López-Martín, C. Rosell, C. Fonseca\",\"doi\":\"10.2461/WBP.2013.IBEUN.0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Long time ago, observing ungulates in the Iberian Peninsula (IP) was a privilege for few lucky people. In those days Iberian ibexes, chamois, roe deer or red deer populations were moderately abundant in some game units or present in remote areas of IP. However, currently, ungulate populations in the IP are mostly a conservation success story, as their numbers and distribution range have increased substantially over most of our territory. This extraordinary population increase has created new challenges for hunters, wildlife ecologists, veterinarians and managers. Actually, not only wild boars are now easy to sight in some cities of the IP but are responsible for certain insecurity for local residents, specially due to road traffic accidents. Today, roe deer and Iberian ibexes have significantly increased their distribution and it’s possible to see ibexes near to the shoreline and roe deer groups colonizing semi-arid and dry Mediterranean habitats. Surprisingly, the Iberian ibex is absent in some regions of the Iberian range (e.g., centre and south Portugal, or in the Pyrenees) which have triggered an intense debate between managers and researchers about the suitability for a further reintroduction. Little is known, on the other hand, about the current status of old adopted species, such as the aoudad, and we know very little about the status of groups of pot-bellied pigs and feral goats in our countries. The impact of diseases on these species and on human beings (in case of shared diseases and zoonosis) becomes, now more than ever, a very important issue because of the abundance of Iberian ungulate populations. The great conservation and management efforts and successes of the past now face a new challenge: the problem of coexistence of humans with this group of mammals. It is important that scientists, managers, hunters and administrators meet to discuss what to do in the near future. The RUSI (Reunion sobre Ungulados Silvestres Ibericos / Reuniao sobre Ungulados Silvestres Ibericos) is an Iberian forum to bring up those issues. During the last two meetings (the second edition took place on July 2011 in Aveiro, Portugal and the third on October 2013 in Girona, Spain), the following conclusions were built about two main issues: ungulate management and population monitoring (Aveiro, Portugal) and Human-ungulate conflict prevention and management. Regarding ungulate management and population monitoring, the main conclusions have been summarized in the following five points: Game managers and researchers should work towards the promotion of Game Certification, increasing awareness and understanding of a sustainable management and in accordance to the natural selection process and natural population dynamics. Small hunting states from northwest Iberian Peninsula, should work towards developing a global management plans including the management of a specific ungulate population in several states at the same time. Managers should pay attention to supplemental feeding; several studies have proved the link between this management practice and the spread of parasitic and infectious diseases. Health status of populations should be considered in any further ungulate monitoring or management plan. Their role as reservoirs for main zoonosis and other diseases shared between wildlife and livestock-wildlife is too important to ignore. Managers, hunters and unspecialized researchers should have the basic training for detecting the presence of main diseases in their respective working areas. Then, animal health authorities should be immediately informed. Population monitoring is the best support for any further management action. If we develop management plans on ungulate populations without the support of valid and reliable population censuses data, it will be very difficult to reach the management success. Concerning the third RUSI meeting, held in Girona, about conflict prevention and management of ungulate populations, the main original conclusions were the following: The increase in ungulate population numbers in peri-urban and rural areas causes a number of accidents on the roads. Specific preventive and corrective measures should be applied taking into account not only the road type, but also ungulate behaviour. In such urban areas, civic education activities against feeding ungulates should be implemented. In the countryside, ungulates are responsible for crop damages. Farmers are very worried about this and, thus, the collaboration between local environmental administrations, specialists and farmers is necessary to solve such conflicts. Such impacts on crops and the potential of ungulates as disease reservoirs should be taken into consideration in any reintroduction plan of ungulate species. Though hunting is the main method used for control of ungulate populations, new measures should be explored in case of areas where hunting is forbidden. Habitat management practices are recommended in such cases. Ungulate meat is an important food resource in the IP. We need to encourage our markets and internal consumption, but also promote the development of a legal and regulatory framework to improve and make such consume easier. As a final remark, we can assume that the conflicts and problems originated by the current ungulate population status in the Iberian Peninsula give us an excellent opportunity for applying the acquired knowledge obtained over years and to show the extent to which our society has developed. Note: Papers of the first RUSI hold in Zaragoza, Spain (September 2010), can be found in: Garcia-Gonzalez, R. & Herrero, J. (2011) Pirineos, Journal of Mountain Ecology, 166, http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/pirineos.2011.v166 .\",\"PeriodicalId\":89522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2461/WBP.2013.IBEUN.0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2461/WBP.2013.IBEUN.0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
很久以前,在伊比利亚半岛(IP)观察有蹄类动物是少数幸运儿的特权。在那些日子里,伊比利亚野山羊、岩羚羊、狍或马鹿的种群在一些狩猎单位或在IP的偏远地区数量适中。然而,目前,有蹄类动物的数量和分布范围在我们的大部分领土上都大幅增加,这在保护知识产权区内是一个成功的故事。这种惊人的人口增长给猎人、野生动物生态学家、兽医和管理者带来了新的挑战。事实上,野猪现在不仅在一些城市很容易看到,而且对当地居民造成了一定的不安全,特别是由于道路交通事故。如今,狍子和伊比利亚野山羊的分布显著增加,在海岸线附近可以看到野山羊,在半干旱和干燥的地中海栖息地可以看到狍子群。令人惊讶的是,伊比利亚野山羊在伊比利亚山脉的一些地区(例如,葡萄牙中部和南部,或比利牛斯山脉)是缺席的,这引发了管理者和研究人员之间关于进一步重新引入的适用性的激烈争论。另一方面,我们对古老的被收养物种的现状知之甚少,比如野驴,我们对我们国家的大肚猪和野生山羊群的状况也知之甚少。疾病对这些物种和人类的影响(在共有疾病和人畜共患病的情况下),现在比以往任何时候都更加成为一个非常重要的问题,因为伊比利亚有蹄动物种群丰富。过去巨大的保护和管理努力和成功现在面临着一个新的挑战:人类与这群哺乳动物共存的问题。科学家、管理人员、猎人和行政人员开会讨论在不久的将来要做什么是很重要的。RUSI (Reunion sobre Ungulados Silvestres Ibericos / Reuniao sobre Ungulados Silvestres Ibericos)是一个提出这些问题的伊比利亚论坛。在最近两次会议期间(第二次会议于2011年7月在葡萄牙阿威罗举行,第三次会议于2013年10月在西班牙赫罗纳举行),就两个主要问题得出了以下结论:有蹄类动物管理和种群监测(葡萄牙阿威罗)以及人类与有蹄类动物冲突的预防和管理。在有蹄类动物管理和种群监测方面,本文总结了以下五点结论:游戏管理者和研究人员应努力促进游戏认证,提高对可持续管理的认识和理解,并根据自然选择过程和自然种群动态。伊比利亚半岛西北部的小型狩猎国家应该努力制定一项全球管理计划,包括同时管理几个州的特定有蹄类动物种群。管理人员应注意补充饲喂;若干研究证明了这种管理做法与寄生虫病和传染病的蔓延之间的联系。在任何进一步不受管制的监测或管理计划中都应考虑到人口的健康状况。它们作为主要人畜共患病和野生动物与牲畜-野生动物之间共有的其他疾病的宿主的作用太重要了,不容忽视。管理人员、猎人和非专业研究人员应接受在各自工作区域检测主要疾病的基本培训。然后,应立即通知动物卫生当局。人口监测是对任何进一步管理行动的最佳支持。如果在没有有效可靠的人口普查数据支持的情况下制定有蹄类人口管理计划,将很难取得管理的成功。关于在赫罗纳举行的关于预防冲突和有蹄类人口管理的第三次入寺会议,最初的主要结论如下:城郊和农村地区有蹄类人口数量的增加造成了一些道路事故。应采取具体的预防和纠正措施,不仅考虑到道路类型,而且考虑到不规范的行为。在这些城市地区,应实施反对喂养有蹄动物的公民教育活动。在农村,有蹄动物要对农作物的损害负责。农民对此非常担忧,因此,地方环保部门、专家和农民之间的合作是解决这种冲突的必要条件。在任何有蹄类物种的重新引入计划中,都应考虑到这种对作物的影响以及有蹄类动物作为疾病寄主的潜力。虽然狩猎是控制有蹄类动物数量的主要方法,但对于禁止狩猎的地区,应该探索新的措施。在这种情况下,建议采取生境管理措施。
Ungulate Biology, Health and Management in the 21st century: the Tables are Turned in the Iberian Peninsula
Long time ago, observing ungulates in the Iberian Peninsula (IP) was a privilege for few lucky people. In those days Iberian ibexes, chamois, roe deer or red deer populations were moderately abundant in some game units or present in remote areas of IP. However, currently, ungulate populations in the IP are mostly a conservation success story, as their numbers and distribution range have increased substantially over most of our territory. This extraordinary population increase has created new challenges for hunters, wildlife ecologists, veterinarians and managers. Actually, not only wild boars are now easy to sight in some cities of the IP but are responsible for certain insecurity for local residents, specially due to road traffic accidents. Today, roe deer and Iberian ibexes have significantly increased their distribution and it’s possible to see ibexes near to the shoreline and roe deer groups colonizing semi-arid and dry Mediterranean habitats. Surprisingly, the Iberian ibex is absent in some regions of the Iberian range (e.g., centre and south Portugal, or in the Pyrenees) which have triggered an intense debate between managers and researchers about the suitability for a further reintroduction. Little is known, on the other hand, about the current status of old adopted species, such as the aoudad, and we know very little about the status of groups of pot-bellied pigs and feral goats in our countries. The impact of diseases on these species and on human beings (in case of shared diseases and zoonosis) becomes, now more than ever, a very important issue because of the abundance of Iberian ungulate populations. The great conservation and management efforts and successes of the past now face a new challenge: the problem of coexistence of humans with this group of mammals. It is important that scientists, managers, hunters and administrators meet to discuss what to do in the near future. The RUSI (Reunion sobre Ungulados Silvestres Ibericos / Reuniao sobre Ungulados Silvestres Ibericos) is an Iberian forum to bring up those issues. During the last two meetings (the second edition took place on July 2011 in Aveiro, Portugal and the third on October 2013 in Girona, Spain), the following conclusions were built about two main issues: ungulate management and population monitoring (Aveiro, Portugal) and Human-ungulate conflict prevention and management. Regarding ungulate management and population monitoring, the main conclusions have been summarized in the following five points: Game managers and researchers should work towards the promotion of Game Certification, increasing awareness and understanding of a sustainable management and in accordance to the natural selection process and natural population dynamics. Small hunting states from northwest Iberian Peninsula, should work towards developing a global management plans including the management of a specific ungulate population in several states at the same time. Managers should pay attention to supplemental feeding; several studies have proved the link between this management practice and the spread of parasitic and infectious diseases. Health status of populations should be considered in any further ungulate monitoring or management plan. Their role as reservoirs for main zoonosis and other diseases shared between wildlife and livestock-wildlife is too important to ignore. Managers, hunters and unspecialized researchers should have the basic training for detecting the presence of main diseases in their respective working areas. Then, animal health authorities should be immediately informed. Population monitoring is the best support for any further management action. If we develop management plans on ungulate populations without the support of valid and reliable population censuses data, it will be very difficult to reach the management success. Concerning the third RUSI meeting, held in Girona, about conflict prevention and management of ungulate populations, the main original conclusions were the following: The increase in ungulate population numbers in peri-urban and rural areas causes a number of accidents on the roads. Specific preventive and corrective measures should be applied taking into account not only the road type, but also ungulate behaviour. In such urban areas, civic education activities against feeding ungulates should be implemented. In the countryside, ungulates are responsible for crop damages. Farmers are very worried about this and, thus, the collaboration between local environmental administrations, specialists and farmers is necessary to solve such conflicts. Such impacts on crops and the potential of ungulates as disease reservoirs should be taken into consideration in any reintroduction plan of ungulate species. Though hunting is the main method used for control of ungulate populations, new measures should be explored in case of areas where hunting is forbidden. Habitat management practices are recommended in such cases. Ungulate meat is an important food resource in the IP. We need to encourage our markets and internal consumption, but also promote the development of a legal and regulatory framework to improve and make such consume easier. As a final remark, we can assume that the conflicts and problems originated by the current ungulate population status in the Iberian Peninsula give us an excellent opportunity for applying the acquired knowledge obtained over years and to show the extent to which our society has developed. Note: Papers of the first RUSI hold in Zaragoza, Spain (September 2010), can be found in: Garcia-Gonzalez, R. & Herrero, J. (2011) Pirineos, Journal of Mountain Ecology, 166, http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/pirineos.2011.v166 .