犊牛腹泻中产肠毒素大肠杆菌的分子和血清学检测

H. Pourtaghi, Sina Ghaznavi, H. Sodagari, Amir Ghadimianazar
{"title":"犊牛腹泻中产肠毒素大肠杆菌的分子和血清学检测","authors":"H. Pourtaghi, Sina Ghaznavi, H. Sodagari, Amir Ghadimianazar","doi":"10.12988/ASB.2015.5316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was performed to estimate the prevalence of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) in calves’ diarrhoea samples by molecular and serological methods. Rectal swabs from 127 diarrhoeaic calves were collected from 10 different farms of Tehran province during March to September 2014. ETEC was detected by both mPCR and ELISA. According to the results, ETEC was detected in 14 (11%) and 5 (3.9%) diarrhoea samples by mPCR and ELISA methods respectively. All 14 positive samples were detected by mPCR method had three virulence genes including K99 (F5), F41 and STa. Although 11 (78.5%) and 3 (21.4%) positive cases were identified from traditional and semi-industrial farms respectively, no isolates were identified related to the industrial farms. The results represented that detection assays such as ELISA which is only able to detect fimbriae (F5), will follow false-positive cases. For this reason mPCR assay has been developed and recognized as effective, rapid and reliable tools for detection of ETEC.","PeriodicalId":7194,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Studies in Biology","volume":"515 1","pages":"293-300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolated from calves’ diarrhoea samples by molecular and serological methods\",\"authors\":\"H. Pourtaghi, Sina Ghaznavi, H. Sodagari, Amir Ghadimianazar\",\"doi\":\"10.12988/ASB.2015.5316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was performed to estimate the prevalence of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) in calves’ diarrhoea samples by molecular and serological methods. Rectal swabs from 127 diarrhoeaic calves were collected from 10 different farms of Tehran province during March to September 2014. ETEC was detected by both mPCR and ELISA. According to the results, ETEC was detected in 14 (11%) and 5 (3.9%) diarrhoea samples by mPCR and ELISA methods respectively. All 14 positive samples were detected by mPCR method had three virulence genes including K99 (F5), F41 and STa. Although 11 (78.5%) and 3 (21.4%) positive cases were identified from traditional and semi-industrial farms respectively, no isolates were identified related to the industrial farms. The results represented that detection assays such as ELISA which is only able to detect fimbriae (F5), will follow false-positive cases. For this reason mPCR assay has been developed and recognized as effective, rapid and reliable tools for detection of ETEC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Studies in Biology\",\"volume\":\"515 1\",\"pages\":\"293-300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Studies in Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12988/ASB.2015.5316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Studies in Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12988/ASB.2015.5316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本研究旨在通过分子和血清学方法估计犊牛腹泻样本中产肠毒素大肠杆菌(ETEC)的患病率。2014年3月至9月期间,从德黑兰省10个不同的农场收集了127头腹泻小牛的直肠拭子。用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)检测ETEC。结果显示,用mPCR法和ELISA法分别在14例(11%)和5例(3.9%)腹泻样品中检出ETEC。14份阳性标本均含有K99 (F5)、F41和STa 3个毒力基因。传统养殖场和半工业化养殖场分别检出阳性11例(78.5%)和3例(21.4%),未检出与工业化养殖场相关的分离株。结果表明,ELISA等检测方法只能检测到菌毛(F5),将会出现假阳性病例。因此,mPCR法被认为是一种有效、快速和可靠的ETEC检测工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolated from calves’ diarrhoea samples by molecular and serological methods
This study was performed to estimate the prevalence of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) in calves’ diarrhoea samples by molecular and serological methods. Rectal swabs from 127 diarrhoeaic calves were collected from 10 different farms of Tehran province during March to September 2014. ETEC was detected by both mPCR and ELISA. According to the results, ETEC was detected in 14 (11%) and 5 (3.9%) diarrhoea samples by mPCR and ELISA methods respectively. All 14 positive samples were detected by mPCR method had three virulence genes including K99 (F5), F41 and STa. Although 11 (78.5%) and 3 (21.4%) positive cases were identified from traditional and semi-industrial farms respectively, no isolates were identified related to the industrial farms. The results represented that detection assays such as ELISA which is only able to detect fimbriae (F5), will follow false-positive cases. For this reason mPCR assay has been developed and recognized as effective, rapid and reliable tools for detection of ETEC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信