混合动力推进结构的环境和技术经济评价

C. Nasoulis, G. Protopapadakis, E. G. Ntouvelos, V. Gkoutzamanis, A. Kalfas
{"title":"混合动力推进结构的环境和技术经济评价","authors":"C. Nasoulis, G. Protopapadakis, E. G. Ntouvelos, V. Gkoutzamanis, A. Kalfas","doi":"10.1017/aer.2023.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Hybrid-electric propulsion is a promising alternative to sustainable aviation and is mainly considered for the commuter and regional aircraft class. However, the development of hybrid-electric propulsion variants is affected by the technology readiness level of electric components. The components’ technology will determine the electrification benefit, compared to a conventional aircraft, and will suggest which is the most beneficial variant and which has a closer entry into service date. Within this work, three different dates are explored, namely 2027, 2030 and 2040, to size three Parallel and three Series hybrid-electric architecture variants using an in-house aircraft sizing tool. All variants are compared to a conventional configuration sized using technological assumptions of 2014, with the main comparison metrics being the aircraft block fuel, energy consumption, direct operating cost and holistic environmental impact. On one hand, the Parallel configurations have reduced maximum take-off mass and mission energy consumption compared to the Series, however, the latter show a greater potential for block fuel reduction and require less onboard energy for the same mission. The annual operating cost evaluation indicates that the Parallel hybrid variant of 2030 has greater operational costs than the respective Series variant; however, it has reduced capital costs compared to the latter, making it more economical to operate considering both costs. Additionally, in the case of an energy recession, both hybrid variants of 2030 show a further cost reduction, with the Series having a total reduction of 10.4% excluding capital costs, compared to the reference aircraft. Moreover, the life cycle assessment shows that the Series variants have a lower environmental impact, both compared to the reference aircraft and the Parallel variants. The former could be up to 59.7% less detrimental to the environment than the reference aircraft, whereas the latter up to 23.9%, with the integration of renewable sources for electricity production. Finally, by the year 2040, the Series variant shows outstanding performance in all comparison metrics, compared to the Parallel and the reference aircraft.","PeriodicalId":22567,"journal":{"name":"The Aeronautical Journal (1968)","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental and techno-economic evaluation for hybrid-electric propulsion architectures\",\"authors\":\"C. Nasoulis, G. Protopapadakis, E. G. Ntouvelos, V. Gkoutzamanis, A. Kalfas\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/aer.2023.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Hybrid-electric propulsion is a promising alternative to sustainable aviation and is mainly considered for the commuter and regional aircraft class. However, the development of hybrid-electric propulsion variants is affected by the technology readiness level of electric components. The components’ technology will determine the electrification benefit, compared to a conventional aircraft, and will suggest which is the most beneficial variant and which has a closer entry into service date. Within this work, three different dates are explored, namely 2027, 2030 and 2040, to size three Parallel and three Series hybrid-electric architecture variants using an in-house aircraft sizing tool. All variants are compared to a conventional configuration sized using technological assumptions of 2014, with the main comparison metrics being the aircraft block fuel, energy consumption, direct operating cost and holistic environmental impact. On one hand, the Parallel configurations have reduced maximum take-off mass and mission energy consumption compared to the Series, however, the latter show a greater potential for block fuel reduction and require less onboard energy for the same mission. The annual operating cost evaluation indicates that the Parallel hybrid variant of 2030 has greater operational costs than the respective Series variant; however, it has reduced capital costs compared to the latter, making it more economical to operate considering both costs. Additionally, in the case of an energy recession, both hybrid variants of 2030 show a further cost reduction, with the Series having a total reduction of 10.4% excluding capital costs, compared to the reference aircraft. Moreover, the life cycle assessment shows that the Series variants have a lower environmental impact, both compared to the reference aircraft and the Parallel variants. The former could be up to 59.7% less detrimental to the environment than the reference aircraft, whereas the latter up to 23.9%, with the integration of renewable sources for electricity production. Finally, by the year 2040, the Series variant shows outstanding performance in all comparison metrics, compared to the Parallel and the reference aircraft.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Aeronautical Journal (1968)\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Aeronautical Journal (1968)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2023.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Aeronautical Journal (1968)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2023.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

混合动力推进是一种很有前途的可持续航空替代方案,主要用于通勤和支线飞机。然而,混合动力推进改型的发展受到电气元件技术成熟程度的影响。与传统飞机相比,这些部件的技术将决定其电气化效益,并将表明哪种型号最有利,哪种型号更接近服役日期。在这项工作中,研究人员探索了三个不同的日期,即2027年、2030年和2040年,使用内部飞机尺寸工具对三种并联和三种串联混合动力架构变体进行了尺寸计算。采用2014年的技术假设,将所有型号与传统配置尺寸进行比较,主要比较指标是飞机块燃料、能耗、直接运营成本和整体环境影响。一方面,与系列相比,平行配置减少了最大起飞质量和任务能耗,然而,后者显示出更大的减少块燃料的潜力,并且需要更少的机载能量来完成相同的任务。年度运行成本评估表明,2030并联混合动力型的运行成本高于各自的串联型;然而,与后者相比,它降低了资本成本,考虑到这两种成本,它的运营更加经济。此外,在能源衰退的情况下,2030的两种混合动力版本都显示出进一步的成本降低,与参考飞机相比,该系列的总成本降低了10.4%,不包括资本成本。此外,生命周期评估表明,与参考飞机和平行变型相比,系列变型对环境的影响更低。前者对环境的危害可能比参考飞机少59.7%,而后者则高达23.9%,与可再生能源的电力生产相结合。最后,到2040年,系列变型在所有比较指标中表现出色,与平行飞机和参考飞机相比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental and techno-economic evaluation for hybrid-electric propulsion architectures
Hybrid-electric propulsion is a promising alternative to sustainable aviation and is mainly considered for the commuter and regional aircraft class. However, the development of hybrid-electric propulsion variants is affected by the technology readiness level of electric components. The components’ technology will determine the electrification benefit, compared to a conventional aircraft, and will suggest which is the most beneficial variant and which has a closer entry into service date. Within this work, three different dates are explored, namely 2027, 2030 and 2040, to size three Parallel and three Series hybrid-electric architecture variants using an in-house aircraft sizing tool. All variants are compared to a conventional configuration sized using technological assumptions of 2014, with the main comparison metrics being the aircraft block fuel, energy consumption, direct operating cost and holistic environmental impact. On one hand, the Parallel configurations have reduced maximum take-off mass and mission energy consumption compared to the Series, however, the latter show a greater potential for block fuel reduction and require less onboard energy for the same mission. The annual operating cost evaluation indicates that the Parallel hybrid variant of 2030 has greater operational costs than the respective Series variant; however, it has reduced capital costs compared to the latter, making it more economical to operate considering both costs. Additionally, in the case of an energy recession, both hybrid variants of 2030 show a further cost reduction, with the Series having a total reduction of 10.4% excluding capital costs, compared to the reference aircraft. Moreover, the life cycle assessment shows that the Series variants have a lower environmental impact, both compared to the reference aircraft and the Parallel variants. The former could be up to 59.7% less detrimental to the environment than the reference aircraft, whereas the latter up to 23.9%, with the integration of renewable sources for electricity production. Finally, by the year 2040, the Series variant shows outstanding performance in all comparison metrics, compared to the Parallel and the reference aircraft.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信