为什么INR在急性缺血性卒中和房颤患者的治疗范围之外

Elyar Sadeghi Hokmabadi, S. Shaafi, Yalda Sadeghpour, Reza Deljavan, J. Jalili, M. Ghojazadeh, Elyar Alizade Najmi, S. Charsouei, M. Farhoudi
{"title":"为什么INR在急性缺血性卒中和房颤患者的治疗范围之外","authors":"Elyar Sadeghi Hokmabadi, S. Shaafi, Yalda Sadeghpour, Reza Deljavan, J. Jalili, M. Ghojazadeh, Elyar Alizade Najmi, S. Charsouei, M. Farhoudi","doi":"10.34172/jrcm.2022.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Warfarin is still the primary drug used to prevent vascular events in patientswith atrial fibrillation (AF), especially in low-income countries. Therapeutic failure and non-adherenceare common causes of recurrent embolic events. The aim of this study was toinvestigate possible reasons why INR was outside the therapeutic range in patients presentingwith acute ischemic stroke and AF. Methods: This prospective study was performed over a ten-month period and all patientsadmitted with acute ischemic stroke were enrolled. Patients with AF who did not have INRwithin the therapeutic range (INR = 2-3) at the time of admission were identified. During a face-to-face interview, the reasons for INR being outside the therapeutic range were assessed basedon a prepared checklist. Results: During the study period, 810 patients had an acute ischemic stroke, of which 177 hadAF heart rhythm (22%). The median age was 76 (IQR: 71-83), and 87 (52%) were male. Of these177 patients, 44 (25%) had a previous history of AF (\"previous AF\" group) and 133 (75%) werediagnosed with AF during the current hospital admission (\"new AF\" group). Among patients onwarfarin but with INR outside the therapeutic range (29 in all), 20 (69%) did not see a physicianregularly and/or did not take medication according to the physician’s instructions. Conclusion: The most common reason for INR being outside the therapeutic range was patientslack of awareness of their heart disease (unrecognized AF). Other reasons included irregularvisits to the physician and drug non-adherence.","PeriodicalId":17071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Clinical Medicine","volume":"346 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why INR is outside the therapeutic range in patients with acuteischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation\",\"authors\":\"Elyar Sadeghi Hokmabadi, S. Shaafi, Yalda Sadeghpour, Reza Deljavan, J. Jalili, M. Ghojazadeh, Elyar Alizade Najmi, S. Charsouei, M. Farhoudi\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/jrcm.2022.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Warfarin is still the primary drug used to prevent vascular events in patientswith atrial fibrillation (AF), especially in low-income countries. Therapeutic failure and non-adherenceare common causes of recurrent embolic events. The aim of this study was toinvestigate possible reasons why INR was outside the therapeutic range in patients presentingwith acute ischemic stroke and AF. Methods: This prospective study was performed over a ten-month period and all patientsadmitted with acute ischemic stroke were enrolled. Patients with AF who did not have INRwithin the therapeutic range (INR = 2-3) at the time of admission were identified. During a face-to-face interview, the reasons for INR being outside the therapeutic range were assessed basedon a prepared checklist. Results: During the study period, 810 patients had an acute ischemic stroke, of which 177 hadAF heart rhythm (22%). The median age was 76 (IQR: 71-83), and 87 (52%) were male. Of these177 patients, 44 (25%) had a previous history of AF (\\\"previous AF\\\" group) and 133 (75%) werediagnosed with AF during the current hospital admission (\\\"new AF\\\" group). Among patients onwarfarin but with INR outside the therapeutic range (29 in all), 20 (69%) did not see a physicianregularly and/or did not take medication according to the physician’s instructions. Conclusion: The most common reason for INR being outside the therapeutic range was patientslack of awareness of their heart disease (unrecognized AF). Other reasons included irregularvisits to the physician and drug non-adherence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"346 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/jrcm.2022.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jrcm.2022.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:华法林仍然是房颤(AF)患者预防血管事件的主要药物,特别是在低收入国家。治疗失败和不依从性是复发性栓塞事件的常见原因。本研究的目的是探讨急性缺血性卒中和房颤患者INR超出治疗范围的可能原因。方法:这项前瞻性研究进行了10个月的时间,纳入了所有急性缺血性卒中患者。确定入院时INR不在治疗范围内(INR = 2-3)的房颤患者。在面对面访谈中,根据准备好的检查表评估INR超出治疗范围的原因。结果:在研究期间,810例患者发生急性缺血性卒中,其中有daf心律177例(22%)。中位年龄76岁(IQR: 71 ~ 83),男性87例(52%)。在这177例患者中,44例(25%)有房颤既往病史(“既往房颤”组),133例(75%)在当前住院期间被诊断为房颤(“新房颤”组)。在使用华法林但INR超出治疗范围的患者中(总共29例),20例(69%)没有定期看医生和/或没有按照医生的指示服药。结论:INR超出治疗范围的最常见原因是患者对自己心脏病的认识不足(未被识别的房颤)。其他原因包括不定期去看医生和不遵医嘱服药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why INR is outside the therapeutic range in patients with acuteischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation
Introduction: Warfarin is still the primary drug used to prevent vascular events in patientswith atrial fibrillation (AF), especially in low-income countries. Therapeutic failure and non-adherenceare common causes of recurrent embolic events. The aim of this study was toinvestigate possible reasons why INR was outside the therapeutic range in patients presentingwith acute ischemic stroke and AF. Methods: This prospective study was performed over a ten-month period and all patientsadmitted with acute ischemic stroke were enrolled. Patients with AF who did not have INRwithin the therapeutic range (INR = 2-3) at the time of admission were identified. During a face-to-face interview, the reasons for INR being outside the therapeutic range were assessed basedon a prepared checklist. Results: During the study period, 810 patients had an acute ischemic stroke, of which 177 hadAF heart rhythm (22%). The median age was 76 (IQR: 71-83), and 87 (52%) were male. Of these177 patients, 44 (25%) had a previous history of AF ("previous AF" group) and 133 (75%) werediagnosed with AF during the current hospital admission ("new AF" group). Among patients onwarfarin but with INR outside the therapeutic range (29 in all), 20 (69%) did not see a physicianregularly and/or did not take medication according to the physician’s instructions. Conclusion: The most common reason for INR being outside the therapeutic range was patientslack of awareness of their heart disease (unrecognized AF). Other reasons included irregularvisits to the physician and drug non-adherence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信