加拿大钢结构抗震评估和升级ASCE 41中非线性建模参数和验收标准的回顾

IF 1.1 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Taeyong Kim, O. Kwon, Joaquín Acosta, Reza Fathi-Fazl, F. Fazileh, Z. Cai
{"title":"加拿大钢结构抗震评估和升级ASCE 41中非线性建模参数和验收标准的回顾","authors":"Taeyong Kim, O. Kwon, Joaquín Acosta, Reza Fathi-Fazl, F. Fazileh, Z. Cai","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2022-0399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The seismic resilience of structures can be quantified through rigorous seismic assessment. Because no detailed guideline is available for nonlinear modelling parameters and the corresponding acceptance criteria for the seismic evaluation and upgrading of steel structures in Canada, the structural commentary of the National Building Code of Canada (NRC, 2015a) suggests using ASCE 41, which has been adopted as a standard for seismic evaluation and retrofit of buildings in the United States (U.S.). However, because the steel design standards in Canada and the U.S. are different, their applicability to steel structures in Canada needs to be investigated. To this end, this paper critically reviews the nonlinear modelling parameters and acceptance criteria in ASCE 41-17 (2017), then recommends whether these values need to be revised or are adopted as is for the seismic evaluation and upgrading of steel structures in Canada. A numerical example of a steel moment-resisting frame is presented to demonstrate the recommended parameters being used for seismic evaluation.","PeriodicalId":9414,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Nonlinear Modelling Parameters and Acceptance Criteria in ASCE 41 for Seismic Evaluation and Upgrading of Steel Structures in Canada\",\"authors\":\"Taeyong Kim, O. Kwon, Joaquín Acosta, Reza Fathi-Fazl, F. Fazileh, Z. Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/cjce-2022-0399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The seismic resilience of structures can be quantified through rigorous seismic assessment. Because no detailed guideline is available for nonlinear modelling parameters and the corresponding acceptance criteria for the seismic evaluation and upgrading of steel structures in Canada, the structural commentary of the National Building Code of Canada (NRC, 2015a) suggests using ASCE 41, which has been adopted as a standard for seismic evaluation and retrofit of buildings in the United States (U.S.). However, because the steel design standards in Canada and the U.S. are different, their applicability to steel structures in Canada needs to be investigated. To this end, this paper critically reviews the nonlinear modelling parameters and acceptance criteria in ASCE 41-17 (2017), then recommends whether these values need to be revised or are adopted as is for the seismic evaluation and upgrading of steel structures in Canada. A numerical example of a steel moment-resisting frame is presented to demonstrate the recommended parameters being used for seismic evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2022-0399\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2022-0399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过严格的抗震评估,可以量化结构的抗震回弹性。由于加拿大钢结构抗震评估和升级的非线性建模参数和相应的验收标准没有详细的指导方针,加拿大国家建筑规范(NRC, 2015a)的结构评论建议使用ASCE 41,该标准已被美国(us)采用为建筑抗震评估和改造的标准。但是,由于加拿大和美国的钢结构设计标准不同,因此需要对加拿大钢结构的适用性进行研究。为此,本文批判性地回顾了ASCE 41-17(2017)中的非线性建模参数和验收标准,然后建议是否需要修改这些值或采用这些值作为加拿大钢结构的抗震评估和升级。最后以某钢抗弯矩框架为例,说明了推荐参数在抗震评价中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of Nonlinear Modelling Parameters and Acceptance Criteria in ASCE 41 for Seismic Evaluation and Upgrading of Steel Structures in Canada
The seismic resilience of structures can be quantified through rigorous seismic assessment. Because no detailed guideline is available for nonlinear modelling parameters and the corresponding acceptance criteria for the seismic evaluation and upgrading of steel structures in Canada, the structural commentary of the National Building Code of Canada (NRC, 2015a) suggests using ASCE 41, which has been adopted as a standard for seismic evaluation and retrofit of buildings in the United States (U.S.). However, because the steel design standards in Canada and the U.S. are different, their applicability to steel structures in Canada needs to be investigated. To this end, this paper critically reviews the nonlinear modelling parameters and acceptance criteria in ASCE 41-17 (2017), then recommends whether these values need to be revised or are adopted as is for the seismic evaluation and upgrading of steel structures in Canada. A numerical example of a steel moment-resisting frame is presented to demonstrate the recommended parameters being used for seismic evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering
Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
14 months
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering is the official journal of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering. It contains articles on environmental engineering, hydrotechnical engineering, structural engineering, construction engineering, engineering mechanics, engineering materials, and history of civil engineering. Contributors include recognized researchers and practitioners in industry, government, and academia. New developments in engineering design and construction are also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信