神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白、神经元特异性烯醇化酶和S100β蛋白对败血症相关脑病的诊断价值

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Zhigang Cao, Xiang Huang, Feixiang Chen
{"title":"神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白、神经元特异性烯醇化酶和S100β蛋白对败血症相关脑病的诊断价值","authors":"Zhigang Cao, Xiang Huang, Feixiang Chen","doi":"10.2478/rrlm-2023-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background To investigate the expressions of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and protein S100β and their diagnostic values for sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE). Methods One hundred patients with sepsis treated from August 2021 to August 2022 were included. They were assigned to a sepsis group (n=65) and an SAE group (n=35), while 50 healthy volunteers physically examined in the same period were enrolled as a control group. The levels of GFAP and NSE were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and that of S100β was determined by transmitted immunoturbidimetric assay. The expressions of GFAP, NSE and S100β in patients with SAE were detected, and their correlations and diagnostic values were analyzed. Results Compared to patients with mild and moderate SAE, those with severe SAE had higher levels of GFAP, NSE and S100β (P<0.05). The levels of GFAP, NSE and S100β were higher in coma patients than those with consciousness disturbance, and they were higher in patients with a poor prognosis than those with a good prognosis (P<0.05). Positive correlations were identified between GFAP and NSE (r=0.573, P=0.001), GFAP and S100β (r=0.468, P=0.005), and NSE and S100β (r=0.540, P=0.001) expression in patients with SAE. Compared with GFAP, NSE and S100β alone, their combination had higher sensitivity and lower specificity for diagnosing SAE (P<0.05). Conclusions There are correlations among GFAP, NSE and S100β, and the combined detection of these three indicators is highly valuable for the diagnosis of SAE.","PeriodicalId":49599,"journal":{"name":"Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator","volume":"53 1","pages":"107 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic values of glial fibrillary acidic protein, neuron-specific enolase and protein S100β for sepsis-associated encephalopathy\",\"authors\":\"Zhigang Cao, Xiang Huang, Feixiang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/rrlm-2023-0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background To investigate the expressions of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and protein S100β and their diagnostic values for sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE). Methods One hundred patients with sepsis treated from August 2021 to August 2022 were included. They were assigned to a sepsis group (n=65) and an SAE group (n=35), while 50 healthy volunteers physically examined in the same period were enrolled as a control group. The levels of GFAP and NSE were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and that of S100β was determined by transmitted immunoturbidimetric assay. The expressions of GFAP, NSE and S100β in patients with SAE were detected, and their correlations and diagnostic values were analyzed. Results Compared to patients with mild and moderate SAE, those with severe SAE had higher levels of GFAP, NSE and S100β (P<0.05). The levels of GFAP, NSE and S100β were higher in coma patients than those with consciousness disturbance, and they were higher in patients with a poor prognosis than those with a good prognosis (P<0.05). Positive correlations were identified between GFAP and NSE (r=0.573, P=0.001), GFAP and S100β (r=0.468, P=0.005), and NSE and S100β (r=0.540, P=0.001) expression in patients with SAE. Compared with GFAP, NSE and S100β alone, their combination had higher sensitivity and lower specificity for diagnosing SAE (P<0.05). Conclusions There are correlations among GFAP, NSE and S100β, and the combined detection of these three indicators is highly valuable for the diagnosis of SAE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"107 - 112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/rrlm-2023-0009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rrlm-2023-0009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究神经胶质原纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)和蛋白S100β的表达及其在脓毒症相关脑病(SAE)中的诊断价值。方法选取2021年8月~ 2022年8月收治的脓毒症患者100例。他们被分为败血症组(n=65)和SAE组(n=35),同时招募50名同期体检的健康志愿者作为对照组。采用酶联免疫吸附法检测GFAP和NSE水平,采用透射免疫比浊法检测S100β水平。检测GFAP、NSE和S100β在SAE患者中的表达,并分析其相关性和诊断价值。结果与轻度和中度SAE患者相比,重度SAE患者GFAP、NSE和S100β水平较高(P<0.05)。昏迷患者GFAP、NSE、S100β水平高于意识障碍患者,预后较差患者高于预后良好患者(P<0.05)。SAE患者GFAP与NSE (r=0.573, P=0.001)、GFAP与S100β (r=0.468, P=0.005)、NSE与S100β (r=0.540, P=0.001)表达呈正相关。与单独使用GFAP、NSE和S100β相比,它们联合诊断SAE的敏感性更高,特异性更低(P<0.05)。结论GFAP、NSE和S100β存在相关性,三者联合检测对SAE的诊断具有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic values of glial fibrillary acidic protein, neuron-specific enolase and protein S100β for sepsis-associated encephalopathy
Abstract Background To investigate the expressions of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and protein S100β and their diagnostic values for sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE). Methods One hundred patients with sepsis treated from August 2021 to August 2022 were included. They were assigned to a sepsis group (n=65) and an SAE group (n=35), while 50 healthy volunteers physically examined in the same period were enrolled as a control group. The levels of GFAP and NSE were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and that of S100β was determined by transmitted immunoturbidimetric assay. The expressions of GFAP, NSE and S100β in patients with SAE were detected, and their correlations and diagnostic values were analyzed. Results Compared to patients with mild and moderate SAE, those with severe SAE had higher levels of GFAP, NSE and S100β (P<0.05). The levels of GFAP, NSE and S100β were higher in coma patients than those with consciousness disturbance, and they were higher in patients with a poor prognosis than those with a good prognosis (P<0.05). Positive correlations were identified between GFAP and NSE (r=0.573, P=0.001), GFAP and S100β (r=0.468, P=0.005), and NSE and S100β (r=0.540, P=0.001) expression in patients with SAE. Compared with GFAP, NSE and S100β alone, their combination had higher sensitivity and lower specificity for diagnosing SAE (P<0.05). Conclusions There are correlations among GFAP, NSE and S100β, and the combined detection of these three indicators is highly valuable for the diagnosis of SAE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator
Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
0.31
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to publish new information that would lead to a better understanding of biological mechanisms of production of human diseases, their prevention and diagnosis as early as possible and to monitor therapy and the development of the health of patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信