酸气去除装置成功切换从硅到聚乙二醇消泡剂消除泡沫

Mohammed Al Rumaih
{"title":"酸气去除装置成功切换从硅到聚乙二醇消泡剂消除泡沫","authors":"Mohammed Al Rumaih","doi":"10.2118/197204-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Natural Gas Liquefaction (NGL) plant Acid Gas Removal (AGR) unit successfully switched from silicon based to polyglycol based antifoam. Changing the type of antifoam was to eliminate the repetitive foaming occurrences in the AGR amine absorber, and to avoid the side effects of the excessive silicon deposits in the circulated amine. The polyglycol based antifoam was found to be more effective and required at lower concentration.\n The AGR unit experienced repetitive amine absorber foaming since the plant commissioning. The foaming events are due to feed quality challenges in the form of liquid hydrocarbon carryover, and suspended solids entrainment. The repetitive foaming led to frequently disturbing the plant operation, reducing the unit throughput and impacting the product quality. To decrease the foaming occurrences the mode of operation for the antifoam injection was changed from intermittent injection to continues injection. However, the unit was so sensitive to the antifoam flow interruptions.\n The required concentration of the silicon based antifoam was high (110 – 130 PPM compared to 20-25 PPM for the polyglycol based antifoam). This led to the side effects of the excessive silicon deposits in the system, such as the fouling of heating equipment (heat exchangers, reboilers and air coolers), the frequent amine filters clogging, and increasing the circulated amine total suspended solids.\n The main objective for switching the type of antifoam is to eliminate the foaming events while minimizing the side effects of the silicon deposits. The polyglycol based antifoam was found more effective for continuous injection with concentration of 20-25 PPM. Furthermore, in the case of minor foaming in the amine absorber, increasing the antifoam concentration to 500 PPM was found to be effective in stabilizing the absorber foaming in less than 5 minutes. In addition, the minor antifoam flow interruptions did not result in foaming events unlike the silicon antifoam.","PeriodicalId":11328,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acid Gas Removal Unit Successful Switch from Silicon to Polyglycol Antifoam to Eliminate Foaming\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Al Rumaih\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/197204-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Natural Gas Liquefaction (NGL) plant Acid Gas Removal (AGR) unit successfully switched from silicon based to polyglycol based antifoam. Changing the type of antifoam was to eliminate the repetitive foaming occurrences in the AGR amine absorber, and to avoid the side effects of the excessive silicon deposits in the circulated amine. The polyglycol based antifoam was found to be more effective and required at lower concentration.\\n The AGR unit experienced repetitive amine absorber foaming since the plant commissioning. The foaming events are due to feed quality challenges in the form of liquid hydrocarbon carryover, and suspended solids entrainment. The repetitive foaming led to frequently disturbing the plant operation, reducing the unit throughput and impacting the product quality. To decrease the foaming occurrences the mode of operation for the antifoam injection was changed from intermittent injection to continues injection. However, the unit was so sensitive to the antifoam flow interruptions.\\n The required concentration of the silicon based antifoam was high (110 – 130 PPM compared to 20-25 PPM for the polyglycol based antifoam). This led to the side effects of the excessive silicon deposits in the system, such as the fouling of heating equipment (heat exchangers, reboilers and air coolers), the frequent amine filters clogging, and increasing the circulated amine total suspended solids.\\n The main objective for switching the type of antifoam is to eliminate the foaming events while minimizing the side effects of the silicon deposits. The polyglycol based antifoam was found more effective for continuous injection with concentration of 20-25 PPM. Furthermore, in the case of minor foaming in the amine absorber, increasing the antifoam concentration to 500 PPM was found to be effective in stabilizing the absorber foaming in less than 5 minutes. In addition, the minor antifoam flow interruptions did not result in foaming events unlike the silicon antifoam.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/197204-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197204-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

天然气液化(NGL)装置酸性气体去除(AGR)装置成功地从硅基防泡剂转换为聚乙二醇基防泡剂。改变消泡剂的类型是为了消除AGR胺吸收器中的重复发泡现象,避免循环胺中硅沉积过多的副作用。发现聚乙二醇基消泡剂在较低浓度下更有效。自装置调试以来,AGR装置经历了反复的胺吸收器发泡。泡沫事件是由于进料质量的挑战,以液态烃的携带和悬浮固体的夹带的形式。重复发泡导致装置运行频繁中断,降低了装置产量,影响了产品质量。为减少泡沫的发生,将消泡剂的注射操作方式由间歇注射改为连续注射。然而,该装置对防泡沫流体中断非常敏感。硅基消泡剂所需的浓度很高(110 - 130 PPM,而聚乙二醇基消泡剂的浓度为20-25 PPM)。这导致了系统中硅沉积过多的副作用,如加热设备(热交换器、再沸器和空气冷却器)结垢,胺过滤器频繁堵塞,循环胺总悬浮物增加。切换消泡剂类型的主要目的是消除泡沫事件,同时尽量减少硅沉积的副作用。聚乙二醇基消泡剂在浓度为20- 25ppm时,连续注射效果更好。此外,在胺吸收器中出现轻微泡沫的情况下,将消泡剂浓度提高到500ppm,可以在5分钟内有效地稳定吸收器的泡沫。此外,与硅消泡剂不同,少量的消泡剂流动中断不会导致泡沫事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acid Gas Removal Unit Successful Switch from Silicon to Polyglycol Antifoam to Eliminate Foaming
Natural Gas Liquefaction (NGL) plant Acid Gas Removal (AGR) unit successfully switched from silicon based to polyglycol based antifoam. Changing the type of antifoam was to eliminate the repetitive foaming occurrences in the AGR amine absorber, and to avoid the side effects of the excessive silicon deposits in the circulated amine. The polyglycol based antifoam was found to be more effective and required at lower concentration. The AGR unit experienced repetitive amine absorber foaming since the plant commissioning. The foaming events are due to feed quality challenges in the form of liquid hydrocarbon carryover, and suspended solids entrainment. The repetitive foaming led to frequently disturbing the plant operation, reducing the unit throughput and impacting the product quality. To decrease the foaming occurrences the mode of operation for the antifoam injection was changed from intermittent injection to continues injection. However, the unit was so sensitive to the antifoam flow interruptions. The required concentration of the silicon based antifoam was high (110 – 130 PPM compared to 20-25 PPM for the polyglycol based antifoam). This led to the side effects of the excessive silicon deposits in the system, such as the fouling of heating equipment (heat exchangers, reboilers and air coolers), the frequent amine filters clogging, and increasing the circulated amine total suspended solids. The main objective for switching the type of antifoam is to eliminate the foaming events while minimizing the side effects of the silicon deposits. The polyglycol based antifoam was found more effective for continuous injection with concentration of 20-25 PPM. Furthermore, in the case of minor foaming in the amine absorber, increasing the antifoam concentration to 500 PPM was found to be effective in stabilizing the absorber foaming in less than 5 minutes. In addition, the minor antifoam flow interruptions did not result in foaming events unlike the silicon antifoam.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信