初中英语教师真实性评价的实施

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Ni Wayan, Tasya Astri, Prawisanthi, N. Luh, Putu Eka, Sulistiana Dewi, A. A. Gede, Yudha Paramartha, Luh Gede, Eka Wahyuni
{"title":"初中英语教师真实性评价的实施","authors":"Ni Wayan, Tasya Astri, Prawisanthi, N. Luh, Putu Eka, Sulistiana Dewi, A. A. Gede, Yudha Paramartha, Luh Gede, Eka Wahyuni","doi":"10.23887/ijll.v5i4.31865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The descriptive study identified the English teachers’ perceived knowledge of authentic assessment at SMP Negeri 3 Singaraja. In conducting the study, observations, questionnaire and interview guide were used. The data were analyzed using descriptive and interactive model analysis. It was found that English teacher at SMP Negeri 3 Singaraja has a good perceived knowledge of authentic assessment implementation. The types of authentic assessment used by the teacher were observation, performance, portfolio, project and peer. There was a discrepancy between teachers’ perceived knowledge and the implementation of authentic assessment. The discrepancy can be seen from the perceived knowledge and implementation of project assessment and peer/self-assessment. The implementation of authentic assessment in online learning were slightly different from face to face teaching. The teachers made certain adjustment for example in assessing students’ attitude in classroom. The attitude observation was adjusted in online learning based on students’ presence in online class and their responsibilities in doing tasks.","PeriodicalId":36638,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies","volume":"231 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Implementation of English Teachers’ Authentic Assessment in Junior High Schools\",\"authors\":\"Ni Wayan, Tasya Astri, Prawisanthi, N. Luh, Putu Eka, Sulistiana Dewi, A. A. Gede, Yudha Paramartha, Luh Gede, Eka Wahyuni\",\"doi\":\"10.23887/ijll.v5i4.31865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The descriptive study identified the English teachers’ perceived knowledge of authentic assessment at SMP Negeri 3 Singaraja. In conducting the study, observations, questionnaire and interview guide were used. The data were analyzed using descriptive and interactive model analysis. It was found that English teacher at SMP Negeri 3 Singaraja has a good perceived knowledge of authentic assessment implementation. The types of authentic assessment used by the teacher were observation, performance, portfolio, project and peer. There was a discrepancy between teachers’ perceived knowledge and the implementation of authentic assessment. The discrepancy can be seen from the perceived knowledge and implementation of project assessment and peer/self-assessment. The implementation of authentic assessment in online learning were slightly different from face to face teaching. The teachers made certain adjustment for example in assessing students’ attitude in classroom. The attitude observation was adjusted in online learning based on students’ presence in online class and their responsibilities in doing tasks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies\",\"volume\":\"231 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23887/ijll.v5i4.31865\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23887/ijll.v5i4.31865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

描述性研究确定了新加坡中学英语教师对真实评估的感知知识。在进行研究时,采用了观察、问卷调查和访谈指南。使用描述性和交互式模型分析对数据进行分析。研究发现,新加坡中学的英语教师对真实评估的实施有良好的认知。教师使用的真实评价类型为观察、表现、作品集、项目和同伴。教师的认知知识与真实评估的实施存在差异。这种差异可以从对项目评估和同行/自我评估的认知和实施中看出。在线学习中真实评估的实施与面对面教学略有不同。教师在评估学生课堂态度等方面做出了一定的调整。根据学生在网络课堂上的存在感和完成任务的责任来调整在线学习中的态度观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Implementation of English Teachers’ Authentic Assessment in Junior High Schools
The descriptive study identified the English teachers’ perceived knowledge of authentic assessment at SMP Negeri 3 Singaraja. In conducting the study, observations, questionnaire and interview guide were used. The data were analyzed using descriptive and interactive model analysis. It was found that English teacher at SMP Negeri 3 Singaraja has a good perceived knowledge of authentic assessment implementation. The types of authentic assessment used by the teacher were observation, performance, portfolio, project and peer. There was a discrepancy between teachers’ perceived knowledge and the implementation of authentic assessment. The discrepancy can be seen from the perceived knowledge and implementation of project assessment and peer/self-assessment. The implementation of authentic assessment in online learning were slightly different from face to face teaching. The teachers made certain adjustment for example in assessing students’ attitude in classroom. The attitude observation was adjusted in online learning based on students’ presence in online class and their responsibilities in doing tasks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies
International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信