全球就是地方:利用全球心理健康方法促进美国的公平并解决差异问题。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Clinical Psychological Science Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-10 DOI:10.1177/21677026221125715
Ali Giusto, Helen E Jack, Jessica F Magidson, David Ayuku, Savannah Johnson, Kathryn Lovero, Sidney H Hankerson, Annika C Sweetland, Bronwyn Myers, Palmira Fortunato Dos Santos, Eve S Puffer, Milton L Wainberg
{"title":"全球就是地方:利用全球心理健康方法促进美国的公平并解决差异问题。","authors":"Ali Giusto, Helen E Jack, Jessica F Magidson, David Ayuku, Savannah Johnson, Kathryn Lovero, Sidney H Hankerson, Annika C Sweetland, Bronwyn Myers, Palmira Fortunato Dos Santos, Eve S Puffer, Milton L Wainberg","doi":"10.1177/21677026221125715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Structural barriers perpetuate mental health disparities for minoritized US populations; global mental health (GMH) takes an interdisciplinary approach to increasing mental health care access and relevance. Mutual capacity building partnerships between low and middle-income countries and high-income countries are beginning to use GMH strategies to address disparities across contexts. We highlight these partnerships and shared GMH strategies through a case series of said partnerships between Kenya-North Carolina, South Africa-Maryland, and Mozambique-New York. We analyzed case materials and narrative descriptions using document review. Shared strategies across cases included: qualitative formative work and partnership-building; selecting and adapting evidence-based interventions; prioritizing accessible, feasible delivery; task-sharing; tailoring training and supervision; and mixed-method, hybrid designs. Bidirectional learning between partners improved the use of strategies in both settings. Integrating GMH strategies into clinical science-and facilitating learning across settings-can improve efforts to expand care in ways that consider culture, context, and systems in low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10962902/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Is Local: Leveraging Global Mental-Health Methods to Promote Equity and Address Disparities in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Giusto, Helen E Jack, Jessica F Magidson, David Ayuku, Savannah Johnson, Kathryn Lovero, Sidney H Hankerson, Annika C Sweetland, Bronwyn Myers, Palmira Fortunato Dos Santos, Eve S Puffer, Milton L Wainberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21677026221125715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Structural barriers perpetuate mental health disparities for minoritized US populations; global mental health (GMH) takes an interdisciplinary approach to increasing mental health care access and relevance. Mutual capacity building partnerships between low and middle-income countries and high-income countries are beginning to use GMH strategies to address disparities across contexts. We highlight these partnerships and shared GMH strategies through a case series of said partnerships between Kenya-North Carolina, South Africa-Maryland, and Mozambique-New York. We analyzed case materials and narrative descriptions using document review. Shared strategies across cases included: qualitative formative work and partnership-building; selecting and adapting evidence-based interventions; prioritizing accessible, feasible delivery; task-sharing; tailoring training and supervision; and mixed-method, hybrid designs. Bidirectional learning between partners improved the use of strategies in both settings. Integrating GMH strategies into clinical science-and facilitating learning across settings-can improve efforts to expand care in ways that consider culture, context, and systems in low-resource settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychological Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10962902/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026221125715\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026221125715","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结构性障碍使美国少数群体的心理健康差距长期存在;全球心理健康(GMH)采用跨学科的方法来提高心理保健的可及性和相关性。中低收入国家与高收入国家之间的相互能力建设伙伴关系正开始利用全球心理健康战略来解决不同背景下的差异问题。我们通过肯尼亚-北卡罗来纳州、南非-马里兰州和莫桑比克-纽约之间的合作案例系列,重点介绍了这些合作关系和共同的全球移动医疗战略。我们通过文件审查分析了案例材料和叙述说明。各案例的共同战略包括:定性形成性工作和伙伴关系建设;选择和调整循证干预措施;优先考虑方便可行的交付;任务分担;量身定制培训和监督;以及混合方法和混合设计。合作伙伴之间的双向学习改进了两种环境下的战略使用。将全球移动医疗战略融入临床科学--促进跨环境学习--可以改善在低资源环境中以考虑文化、环境和系统的方式扩大医疗服务的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global Is Local: Leveraging Global Mental-Health Methods to Promote Equity and Address Disparities in the United States.

Structural barriers perpetuate mental health disparities for minoritized US populations; global mental health (GMH) takes an interdisciplinary approach to increasing mental health care access and relevance. Mutual capacity building partnerships between low and middle-income countries and high-income countries are beginning to use GMH strategies to address disparities across contexts. We highlight these partnerships and shared GMH strategies through a case series of said partnerships between Kenya-North Carolina, South Africa-Maryland, and Mozambique-New York. We analyzed case materials and narrative descriptions using document review. Shared strategies across cases included: qualitative formative work and partnership-building; selecting and adapting evidence-based interventions; prioritizing accessible, feasible delivery; task-sharing; tailoring training and supervision; and mixed-method, hybrid designs. Bidirectional learning between partners improved the use of strategies in both settings. Integrating GMH strategies into clinical science-and facilitating learning across settings-can improve efforts to expand care in ways that consider culture, context, and systems in low-resource settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychological Science
Clinical Psychological Science Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Association for Psychological Science’s journal, Clinical Psychological Science, emerges from this confluence to provide readers with the best, most innovative research in clinical psychological science, giving researchers of all stripes a home for their work and a place in which to communicate with a broad audience of both clinical and other scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信