尾部风险:第2部分:大衰退后缺失的复苏

J. Kozlowski
{"title":"尾部风险:第2部分:大衰退后缺失的复苏","authors":"J. Kozlowski","doi":"10.20955/ES.2019.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"first declines and then exhibits a sharp rebound toward a stable trend line. Following the Great Recession of 2007-09, however, this rebound is missing; the missing recovery is what some economists call “secular stagnation.”1 For example, Figure 1 shows real gross domestic product (GDP) in the United States. The dashed line is a linear trend that fits data for 1950-2007. In 2015, real GDP was 12 percent below the trend; this is the so-called missing recovery. What caused the missing recovery after the Financial Crisis? In Part 1 of this three-part series, I argued that tail risk increased after the Great Recession; that is, the perceived probability that a large negative shock to the economy would occur increased after the 2007-09 recession. In this Part 2 essay, I discuss how this increase in tail risk can help us understand the missing recovery. Tail Risk: Part 2, The Missing Recovery After the Great Recession","PeriodicalId":11402,"journal":{"name":"Economic Synopses","volume":"438 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tail Risk: Part 2, The Missing Recovery After the Great Recession\",\"authors\":\"J. Kozlowski\",\"doi\":\"10.20955/ES.2019.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"first declines and then exhibits a sharp rebound toward a stable trend line. Following the Great Recession of 2007-09, however, this rebound is missing; the missing recovery is what some economists call “secular stagnation.”1 For example, Figure 1 shows real gross domestic product (GDP) in the United States. The dashed line is a linear trend that fits data for 1950-2007. In 2015, real GDP was 12 percent below the trend; this is the so-called missing recovery. What caused the missing recovery after the Financial Crisis? In Part 1 of this three-part series, I argued that tail risk increased after the Great Recession; that is, the perceived probability that a large negative shock to the economy would occur increased after the 2007-09 recession. In this Part 2 essay, I discuss how this increase in tail risk can help us understand the missing recovery. Tail Risk: Part 2, The Missing Recovery After the Great Recession\",\"PeriodicalId\":11402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Synopses\",\"volume\":\"438 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Synopses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20955/ES.2019.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Synopses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20955/ES.2019.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

先是下跌,然后向稳定的趋势线急剧反弹。然而,在2007-09年的大衰退之后,这种反弹消失了;一些经济学家称之为“长期停滞”。例如,图1显示了美国的实际国内生产总值(GDP)。虚线是1950-2007年数据的线性趋势。2015年,实际GDP比趋势线低12%;这就是所谓的“缺失复苏”。是什么导致了金融危机后经济复苏的缺失?在这个由三部分组成的系列文章的第一部分中,我曾指出,大衰退后尾部风险增加了;也就是说,在2007-09年的衰退之后,人们认为经济将遭受重大负面冲击的可能性增加了。在本文的第2部分中,我将讨论尾部风险的增加如何帮助我们理解缺失的复苏。尾部风险:第2部分:大衰退后缺失的复苏
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tail Risk: Part 2, The Missing Recovery After the Great Recession
first declines and then exhibits a sharp rebound toward a stable trend line. Following the Great Recession of 2007-09, however, this rebound is missing; the missing recovery is what some economists call “secular stagnation.”1 For example, Figure 1 shows real gross domestic product (GDP) in the United States. The dashed line is a linear trend that fits data for 1950-2007. In 2015, real GDP was 12 percent below the trend; this is the so-called missing recovery. What caused the missing recovery after the Financial Crisis? In Part 1 of this three-part series, I argued that tail risk increased after the Great Recession; that is, the perceived probability that a large negative shock to the economy would occur increased after the 2007-09 recession. In this Part 2 essay, I discuss how this increase in tail risk can help us understand the missing recovery. Tail Risk: Part 2, The Missing Recovery After the Great Recession
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信