不同类型测验对教师课堂实践的影响

Arina Shofiya
{"title":"不同类型测验对教师课堂实践的影响","authors":"Arina Shofiya","doi":"10.24167/CELT.V19I2.721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To promote the quality of national education, a test, especially high-stake test, has received special concern from the government. Such kind of test brings serious consequence (impact) to some related parties like teachers, students, school systems, and society. This article is intended to highlight how different type of testing affects the teachers’ teaching practices in the classrooms. In Indonesian secondary schools, two types of tests, National Examination (NE) and School Examination (SE) are administered to measure students’ achievement in a particular level as well as to decide students’ graduation. The two tests are different at some points. First, the test for NE was developed and administered by the government through the Board of National Education Standard. Meanwhile, the preparation and administration of the test for SE were done by the English teachers at every school. Second, the test of NE was objective, whereas, the test of SE is subjective in which the students should perform speaking and writing. Using descriptive qualitative research design, the findings of this study revealed that the administration of the different types of tests brings different impacts on the preparation and classrooms practices in which the teachers were more enthusiastic and serious to prepare for the School Examination. It can also be concluded that a particular type of test which requires full involvement of the teachers either in the preparation or the administration brings positive impact on their classroom practices.","PeriodicalId":31698,"journal":{"name":"Celt A Journal of Culture English Language Teaching Literature","volume":"8 1","pages":"222-243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Different Types of Testings on the Teachers’ Classroom Practices\",\"authors\":\"Arina Shofiya\",\"doi\":\"10.24167/CELT.V19I2.721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To promote the quality of national education, a test, especially high-stake test, has received special concern from the government. Such kind of test brings serious consequence (impact) to some related parties like teachers, students, school systems, and society. This article is intended to highlight how different type of testing affects the teachers’ teaching practices in the classrooms. In Indonesian secondary schools, two types of tests, National Examination (NE) and School Examination (SE) are administered to measure students’ achievement in a particular level as well as to decide students’ graduation. The two tests are different at some points. First, the test for NE was developed and administered by the government through the Board of National Education Standard. Meanwhile, the preparation and administration of the test for SE were done by the English teachers at every school. Second, the test of NE was objective, whereas, the test of SE is subjective in which the students should perform speaking and writing. Using descriptive qualitative research design, the findings of this study revealed that the administration of the different types of tests brings different impacts on the preparation and classrooms practices in which the teachers were more enthusiastic and serious to prepare for the School Examination. It can also be concluded that a particular type of test which requires full involvement of the teachers either in the preparation or the administration brings positive impact on their classroom practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Celt A Journal of Culture English Language Teaching Literature\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"222-243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Celt A Journal of Culture English Language Teaching Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24167/CELT.V19I2.721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Celt A Journal of Culture English Language Teaching Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24167/CELT.V19I2.721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了提高国民教育的质量,一项考试,尤其是高风险的考试,受到了政府的特别关注。这种考试给教师、学生、学校制度和社会等相关方带来了严重的后果(影响)。本文旨在强调不同类型的测试如何影响教师在课堂上的教学实践。在印度尼西亚的中学,实行两种类型的考试,即国家考试(NE)和学校考试(SE),以衡量学生在某一特定水平上的成绩,并决定学生的毕业。这两项测试在某些方面有所不同。首先,NE考试是由政府通过国家教育标准委员会开发和管理的。与此同时,SE考试的准备和管理工作由各学校的英语老师完成。第二,英语测试是客观的,而英语测试是主观的,学生应该进行口语和写作。本研究采用描述性质性研究设计,发现不同类型考试的管理对备考和课堂实践的影响不同,教师对学校考试的准备更加热情和认真。这也可以得出结论,一个特定类型的测试,需要教师充分参与准备或管理带来积极的影响,他们的课堂实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Different Types of Testings on the Teachers’ Classroom Practices
To promote the quality of national education, a test, especially high-stake test, has received special concern from the government. Such kind of test brings serious consequence (impact) to some related parties like teachers, students, school systems, and society. This article is intended to highlight how different type of testing affects the teachers’ teaching practices in the classrooms. In Indonesian secondary schools, two types of tests, National Examination (NE) and School Examination (SE) are administered to measure students’ achievement in a particular level as well as to decide students’ graduation. The two tests are different at some points. First, the test for NE was developed and administered by the government through the Board of National Education Standard. Meanwhile, the preparation and administration of the test for SE were done by the English teachers at every school. Second, the test of NE was objective, whereas, the test of SE is subjective in which the students should perform speaking and writing. Using descriptive qualitative research design, the findings of this study revealed that the administration of the different types of tests brings different impacts on the preparation and classrooms practices in which the teachers were more enthusiastic and serious to prepare for the School Examination. It can also be concluded that a particular type of test which requires full involvement of the teachers either in the preparation or the administration brings positive impact on their classroom practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信