灾难之源:“3.11”后日本认知新视角圆桌讨论

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES
Lisa Onaga, C. Schieder, Kristina Buhrman, Julia Mariko Jacoby, Kohta Juraku, D. H. Slater, Anna Wiemann, Alexander Dekant, Stella Winter, Jacob Herzum, Levi McLaughlin, Angela Marie Ortiz
{"title":"灾难之源:“3.11”后日本认知新视角圆桌讨论","authors":"Lisa Onaga, C. Schieder, Kristina Buhrman, Julia Mariko Jacoby, Kohta Juraku, D. H. Slater, Anna Wiemann, Alexander Dekant, Stella Winter, Jacob Herzum, Levi McLaughlin, Angela Marie Ortiz","doi":"10.1080/18752160.2021.1997015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract On 16 March 2021, the Teach311 + COVID-19 Collective (www.teach311.org) hosted a virtual roundtable discussion entitled “Sources of Disaster: New Epistemic Perspectives in Post-3.11 Japan.” The event brought together scholars and students researching the history and anthropology of Japan to explore how the earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear power plant disaster of 11 March 2011 (3.11) changed our ways of knowing the world. The roundtable focused on the idea of the “source” to get at these epistemic shifts in lived experience and practical knowledge as well as historiography, and to investigate ideas that range from what we can know about acceptable risk and safety to notions of home and belonging. “Source” is a way to think about origins, but also the materials—texts, media, or testimony—that we collect and analyze to give rise to new or better knowledge. Building upon previous Teach311 activities that explored the roots of 3.11 and genba, participants in this roundtable expanded upon the significance and meanings of the notion of a “source” relative to the politics of epistemology in their research and studies in order to examine what reconstruction means in history when it is conducted alongside recovery.","PeriodicalId":45255,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Science Technology and Society-An International Journal","volume":"30 Suppl 1 1","pages":"482 - 496"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sources of Disaster: A Roundtable Discussion on New Epistemic Perspectives in Post-3.11 Japan\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Onaga, C. Schieder, Kristina Buhrman, Julia Mariko Jacoby, Kohta Juraku, D. H. Slater, Anna Wiemann, Alexander Dekant, Stella Winter, Jacob Herzum, Levi McLaughlin, Angela Marie Ortiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18752160.2021.1997015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract On 16 March 2021, the Teach311 + COVID-19 Collective (www.teach311.org) hosted a virtual roundtable discussion entitled “Sources of Disaster: New Epistemic Perspectives in Post-3.11 Japan.” The event brought together scholars and students researching the history and anthropology of Japan to explore how the earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear power plant disaster of 11 March 2011 (3.11) changed our ways of knowing the world. The roundtable focused on the idea of the “source” to get at these epistemic shifts in lived experience and practical knowledge as well as historiography, and to investigate ideas that range from what we can know about acceptable risk and safety to notions of home and belonging. “Source” is a way to think about origins, but also the materials—texts, media, or testimony—that we collect and analyze to give rise to new or better knowledge. Building upon previous Teach311 activities that explored the roots of 3.11 and genba, participants in this roundtable expanded upon the significance and meanings of the notion of a “source” relative to the politics of epistemology in their research and studies in order to examine what reconstruction means in history when it is conducted alongside recovery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East Asian Science Technology and Society-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"30 Suppl 1 1\",\"pages\":\"482 - 496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East Asian Science Technology and Society-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18752160.2021.1997015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Science Technology and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18752160.2021.1997015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2021年3月16日,Teach311 + COVID-19集体(www.teach311.org)举办了一场名为“灾难来源:3.11后日本的新认知视角”的虚拟圆桌讨论。该活动将研究日本历史和人类学的学者和学生聚集在一起,探讨2011年3月11日(3.11)的地震、海啸和核电站灾难如何改变了我们认识世界的方式。圆桌会议的重点是“来源”的概念,以了解生活经验和实践知识以及历史编纂中的这些认知转变,并调查从我们所知道的可接受的风险和安全到家庭和归属感的概念。“来源”是一种思考起源的方式,也是我们收集和分析的材料——文本、媒体或证词,以产生新的或更好的知识。在之前的Teach311活动的基础上,探讨了3.11和genba的根源,本次圆桌会议的参与者在他们的研究和研究中扩展了相对于认识论政治的“源头”概念的重要性和意义,以检验当重建与恢复一起进行时,重建在历史上意味着什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sources of Disaster: A Roundtable Discussion on New Epistemic Perspectives in Post-3.11 Japan
Abstract On 16 March 2021, the Teach311 + COVID-19 Collective (www.teach311.org) hosted a virtual roundtable discussion entitled “Sources of Disaster: New Epistemic Perspectives in Post-3.11 Japan.” The event brought together scholars and students researching the history and anthropology of Japan to explore how the earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear power plant disaster of 11 March 2011 (3.11) changed our ways of knowing the world. The roundtable focused on the idea of the “source” to get at these epistemic shifts in lived experience and practical knowledge as well as historiography, and to investigate ideas that range from what we can know about acceptable risk and safety to notions of home and belonging. “Source” is a way to think about origins, but also the materials—texts, media, or testimony—that we collect and analyze to give rise to new or better knowledge. Building upon previous Teach311 activities that explored the roots of 3.11 and genba, participants in this roundtable expanded upon the significance and meanings of the notion of a “source” relative to the politics of epistemology in their research and studies in order to examine what reconstruction means in history when it is conducted alongside recovery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信