基于相机陷阱照片的中小型哺乳动物专家识别可靠性研究

P. Meek, K. Vernes, G. Falzon
{"title":"基于相机陷阱照片的中小型哺乳动物专家识别可靠性研究","authors":"P. Meek, K. Vernes, G. Falzon","doi":"10.2461/WBP.2013.9.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Camera trapping in scientific research has captivated practitioners globally and is now widely used as a primary survey method. Using photos to identify some species, especially coexisting small species of similar appearance and niche is questionable and if incorrectly identified can lead to poor conservation and management outcomes. The aim of our investigation was to test how accurately mammalogists with expertise in mammal identification could identify a range of small-medium sized species recorded during camera trap surveys. This study presents the results of an Australian case study but the findings apply broadly and are relevant throughout the world's ecosystems. Using an internet survey, 58 questions were posed to assess practitioner expertise in mammal trapping, and their accuracy in identifying 21 photos of 10 small-medium sized Australian mammal species. Particular focus was placed on the identification of the rare and threatened Hastings River Mouse (Pseudomys oralis) but other rodent species such as the Black Rat (Rattus rattus), the Bush Rat (Rattus fuscipes), and the Swamp Rat (Rattus lutreolus) were included. The survey indicated that the correct identification of some small mammals, in particular rodents, is highly variable between images of the same species, and that as a whole the professional wildlife community performs poorly at the identification of such species. Identification was more accurate where species were less likely to be confused with similar looking species, or where their identification was simple and/or obvious. Accurate identification of small-medium sized mammals, in particular rodents using camera trap imagery is difficult and this study highlights the potential discrepancies that may arise in wildlife research. Robust methods to assist in minimising errors and bias of animal identification need to be explored. In circumstances where similar looking species coexist, or in species rich ecosystems, a reliance on camera trapping alone may lead to mistaken identity.","PeriodicalId":89522,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)","volume":"2 1","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Reliability of Expert Identification of Small-Medium Sized Mammals from Camera Trap Photos\",\"authors\":\"P. Meek, K. Vernes, G. Falzon\",\"doi\":\"10.2461/WBP.2013.9.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Camera trapping in scientific research has captivated practitioners globally and is now widely used as a primary survey method. Using photos to identify some species, especially coexisting small species of similar appearance and niche is questionable and if incorrectly identified can lead to poor conservation and management outcomes. The aim of our investigation was to test how accurately mammalogists with expertise in mammal identification could identify a range of small-medium sized species recorded during camera trap surveys. This study presents the results of an Australian case study but the findings apply broadly and are relevant throughout the world's ecosystems. Using an internet survey, 58 questions were posed to assess practitioner expertise in mammal trapping, and their accuracy in identifying 21 photos of 10 small-medium sized Australian mammal species. Particular focus was placed on the identification of the rare and threatened Hastings River Mouse (Pseudomys oralis) but other rodent species such as the Black Rat (Rattus rattus), the Bush Rat (Rattus fuscipes), and the Swamp Rat (Rattus lutreolus) were included. The survey indicated that the correct identification of some small mammals, in particular rodents, is highly variable between images of the same species, and that as a whole the professional wildlife community performs poorly at the identification of such species. Identification was more accurate where species were less likely to be confused with similar looking species, or where their identification was simple and/or obvious. Accurate identification of small-medium sized mammals, in particular rodents using camera trap imagery is difficult and this study highlights the potential discrepancies that may arise in wildlife research. Robust methods to assist in minimising errors and bias of animal identification need to be explored. In circumstances where similar looking species coexist, or in species rich ecosystems, a reliance on camera trapping alone may lead to mistaken identity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"42\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2461/WBP.2013.9.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2461/WBP.2013.9.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

摘要

科学研究中的相机陷阱已经吸引了全球的从业者,现在被广泛用作一种主要的调查方法。用照片来识别一些物种,特别是共存的、外观和生态位相似的小物种是值得怀疑的,如果识别不正确,可能会导致不良的保护和管理结果。我们调查的目的是测试具有哺乳动物鉴定专业知识的哺乳动物学家如何准确地识别在相机陷阱调查中记录的一系列中小型物种。本研究提出了一个澳大利亚案例研究的结果,但研究结果适用范围很广,并且与整个世界的生态系统相关。通过网络调查,提出了58个问题来评估从业者在哺乳动物捕捉方面的专业知识,以及他们识别10种中小型澳大利亚哺乳动物的21张照片的准确性。特别关注的是稀有和濒危的黑斯廷斯河鼠(Pseudomys oralis)的鉴定,但其他啮齿动物物种如黑鼠(Rattus Rattus)、丛林鼠(Rattus fuscipes)和沼泽鼠(Rattus lutreolus)也被包括在内。调查表明,对一些小型哺乳动物,特别是啮齿动物的正确识别,在同一物种的图像之间是高度可变的,并且作为一个整体,专业野生动物社区在识别这些物种方面表现不佳。当物种不太可能与相似的物种混淆,或者它们的识别简单和/或明显时,识别更准确。使用相机陷阱图像准确识别中小型哺乳动物,特别是啮齿动物是困难的,本研究强调了野生动物研究中可能出现的潜在差异。需要探索可靠的方法来帮助最大限度地减少动物识别的错误和偏差。在长相相似的物种共存的情况下,或者在物种丰富的生态系统中,仅仅依靠相机捕捉可能会导致错误的识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Reliability of Expert Identification of Small-Medium Sized Mammals from Camera Trap Photos
Camera trapping in scientific research has captivated practitioners globally and is now widely used as a primary survey method. Using photos to identify some species, especially coexisting small species of similar appearance and niche is questionable and if incorrectly identified can lead to poor conservation and management outcomes. The aim of our investigation was to test how accurately mammalogists with expertise in mammal identification could identify a range of small-medium sized species recorded during camera trap surveys. This study presents the results of an Australian case study but the findings apply broadly and are relevant throughout the world's ecosystems. Using an internet survey, 58 questions were posed to assess practitioner expertise in mammal trapping, and their accuracy in identifying 21 photos of 10 small-medium sized Australian mammal species. Particular focus was placed on the identification of the rare and threatened Hastings River Mouse (Pseudomys oralis) but other rodent species such as the Black Rat (Rattus rattus), the Bush Rat (Rattus fuscipes), and the Swamp Rat (Rattus lutreolus) were included. The survey indicated that the correct identification of some small mammals, in particular rodents, is highly variable between images of the same species, and that as a whole the professional wildlife community performs poorly at the identification of such species. Identification was more accurate where species were less likely to be confused with similar looking species, or where their identification was simple and/or obvious. Accurate identification of small-medium sized mammals, in particular rodents using camera trap imagery is difficult and this study highlights the potential discrepancies that may arise in wildlife research. Robust methods to assist in minimising errors and bias of animal identification need to be explored. In circumstances where similar looking species coexist, or in species rich ecosystems, a reliance on camera trapping alone may lead to mistaken identity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信