康德与列维纳斯的主体性:对他者的自主与被动

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
D. Rojas
{"title":"康德与列维纳斯的主体性:对他者的自主与被动","authors":"D. Rojas","doi":"10.32735/s0718-2201202000050789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyses Levinas’s notion of subjectivity and examines its possible links with the notion developed by Kant, understood the latter as an exemplary vision of the modern explanation of subjectivity. Hofmeyr’s position is discussed, who argues that there was a paradigmatic shift between an \"early Levinas\" centred on a freedom of Kantian type, and a \"later Levinas\" focused on passivity and that transcends Kant. The article shows that subjectivity in Levinas can never be understood as an activity in the Kantian sense.","PeriodicalId":43217,"journal":{"name":"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia","volume":"1 1","pages":"95-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La subjetividad en Kant y Levinas: autonomía y pasividad frente a la alteridad\",\"authors\":\"D. Rojas\",\"doi\":\"10.32735/s0718-2201202000050789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyses Levinas’s notion of subjectivity and examines its possible links with the notion developed by Kant, understood the latter as an exemplary vision of the modern explanation of subjectivity. Hofmeyr’s position is discussed, who argues that there was a paradigmatic shift between an \\\"early Levinas\\\" centred on a freedom of Kantian type, and a \\\"later Levinas\\\" focused on passivity and that transcends Kant. The article shows that subjectivity in Levinas can never be understood as an activity in the Kantian sense.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"95-108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32735/s0718-2201202000050789\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32735/s0718-2201202000050789","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了列维纳斯的主体性概念,并考察了它与康德概念的可能联系,康德概念被理解为现代主体性解释的典范。本文讨论了霍夫梅尔的立场,他认为在以康德式自由为中心的“早期列维纳斯”和以超越康德的被动为中心的“后期列维纳斯”之间存在着范式转变。本文表明,列维纳斯的主体性永远不能被理解为康德意义上的活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La subjetividad en Kant y Levinas: autonomía y pasividad frente a la alteridad
The article analyses Levinas’s notion of subjectivity and examines its possible links with the notion developed by Kant, understood the latter as an exemplary vision of the modern explanation of subjectivity. Hofmeyr’s position is discussed, who argues that there was a paradigmatic shift between an "early Levinas" centred on a freedom of Kantian type, and a "later Levinas" focused on passivity and that transcends Kant. The article shows that subjectivity in Levinas can never be understood as an activity in the Kantian sense.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia
Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信