{"title":"英语本科生研究计划的相似度检验","authors":"I. Permana","doi":"10.23887/ika.v20i1.43315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study aimed at identifying the similarity found in undergraduate students’ research working paper. In doing similarity check, a software named Plagiarism X checker was used. A hundred students’ research paper were collected and similarity checked. The result showed that the similarity identified in students work is 22.18% which falls into medium category. The highest percentage of similarity is found in the background of study (13.86%) followed with theoretical review (5.22%) and research method (3.08%). In background of study, the highest percentage of similarity is 34% that belongs to medium level. Meanwhile in theoretical review and research method the similarity is less than 15% that indicates a small level. Some papers were identified contain a stolen paragraph because the use of exact same words with the original sources without any process of editing. Discussion and suggestions are further presented.","PeriodicalId":17706,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal IKA PGSD (Ikatan Alumni PGSD) UNARS","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CHECKING SIMILARITY IN EFL UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS’ RESEARCH PROPOSAL\",\"authors\":\"I. Permana\",\"doi\":\"10.23887/ika.v20i1.43315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current study aimed at identifying the similarity found in undergraduate students’ research working paper. In doing similarity check, a software named Plagiarism X checker was used. A hundred students’ research paper were collected and similarity checked. The result showed that the similarity identified in students work is 22.18% which falls into medium category. The highest percentage of similarity is found in the background of study (13.86%) followed with theoretical review (5.22%) and research method (3.08%). In background of study, the highest percentage of similarity is 34% that belongs to medium level. Meanwhile in theoretical review and research method the similarity is less than 15% that indicates a small level. Some papers were identified contain a stolen paragraph because the use of exact same words with the original sources without any process of editing. Discussion and suggestions are further presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal IKA PGSD (Ikatan Alumni PGSD) UNARS\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal IKA PGSD (Ikatan Alumni PGSD) UNARS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23887/ika.v20i1.43315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal IKA PGSD (Ikatan Alumni PGSD) UNARS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23887/ika.v20i1.43315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在找出大学生研究工作论文的相似性。在进行相似性检查时,使用了一个名为Plagiarism X checker的软件。收集100名学生的研究论文并进行相似性检验。结果表明,学生作业的相似度为22.18%,属于中等类别。相似度最高的是研究背景(13.86%),其次是理论综述(5.22%)和研究方法(3.08%)。在研究背景中,相似度最高的百分比为34%,属于中等水平。同时,在理论综述和研究方法上,相似度均小于15%,水平较低。一些论文被发现包含一个被盗的段落,因为在没有任何编辑过程的情况下使用了与原始来源完全相同的单词。进一步提出了讨论和建议。
CHECKING SIMILARITY IN EFL UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS’ RESEARCH PROPOSAL
The current study aimed at identifying the similarity found in undergraduate students’ research working paper. In doing similarity check, a software named Plagiarism X checker was used. A hundred students’ research paper were collected and similarity checked. The result showed that the similarity identified in students work is 22.18% which falls into medium category. The highest percentage of similarity is found in the background of study (13.86%) followed with theoretical review (5.22%) and research method (3.08%). In background of study, the highest percentage of similarity is 34% that belongs to medium level. Meanwhile in theoretical review and research method the similarity is less than 15% that indicates a small level. Some papers were identified contain a stolen paragraph because the use of exact same words with the original sources without any process of editing. Discussion and suggestions are further presented.