脚本与说话筹码相结合对学生口语成绩的影响

IF 2.5 3区社会学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES

European Journal of Development Research Pub Date : 2022-05-31 DOI:10.28926/jdr.v6i1.216

Annisa Rahmasari, Ratna Nurlia

{"title":"脚本与说话筹码相结合对学生口语成绩的影响","authors":"Annisa Rahmasari, Ratna Nurlia","doi":"10.28926/jdr.v6i1.216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is to find the effectiveness of combining Scriting and Talking Chips which helps students to be more active in speaking class. This research used quasi-experimental research with non-randomized pretest posttest design. The students of English Department of UNIPA Campus Blitar who took Basic Speaking 1 were the subjects of this research, in which Class A as the experimental group and class B as the control group. The instruments of this research were speaking test (pretest and posttest). One group was taught by combining scripting and talking chips method, in contrast, the control group was taught by using direct method. Then, both groups were given a posttest. The data was analyzed using ANCOVA and computed by SPSS version 20. The result of the analysis indicated that combining Scripting and Talking Chips strategy could make students’ speaking achievement better.","PeriodicalId":47650,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Development Research","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of Combining Scripting and Talking Chips on the Students’ Speaking Achievement\",\"authors\":\"Annisa Rahmasari, Ratna Nurlia\",\"doi\":\"10.28926/jdr.v6i1.216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research is to find the effectiveness of combining Scriting and Talking Chips which helps students to be more active in speaking class. This research used quasi-experimental research with non-randomized pretest posttest design. The students of English Department of UNIPA Campus Blitar who took Basic Speaking 1 were the subjects of this research, in which Class A as the experimental group and class B as the control group. The instruments of this research were speaking test (pretest and posttest). One group was taught by combining scripting and talking chips method, in contrast, the control group was taught by using direct method. Then, both groups were given a posttest. The data was analyzed using ANCOVA and computed by SPSS version 20. The result of the analysis indicated that combining Scripting and Talking Chips strategy could make students’ speaking achievement better.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Development Research\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Development Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28926/jdr.v6i1.216\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Development Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28926/jdr.v6i1.216","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究是为了发现结合脚本和说话筹码的有效性，这有助于学生在口语课上更加活跃。本研究采用准实验研究，采用非随机前测后测设计。本研究以UNIPA Campus Blitar英语系基础口语1班的学生为研究对象，其中A班为实验组，B班为对照组。本研究的工具为言语测试(前测和后测)。其中一组采用脚本与说话筹码相结合的教学方法，对照组采用直接教学方法。然后，两组都进行了后测。数据采用ANCOVA分析，SPSS version 20计算。分析结果表明，脚本策略和说话筹码策略相结合可以提高学生的口语成绩。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Effectiveness of Combining Scripting and Talking Chips on the Students’ Speaking Achievement

This research is to find the effectiveness of combining Scriting and Talking Chips which helps students to be more active in speaking class. This research used quasi-experimental research with non-randomized pretest posttest design. The students of English Department of UNIPA Campus Blitar who took Basic Speaking 1 were the subjects of this research, in which Class A as the experimental group and class B as the control group. The instruments of this research were speaking test (pretest and posttest). One group was taught by combining scripting and talking chips method, in contrast, the control group was taught by using direct method. Then, both groups were given a posttest. The data was analyzed using ANCOVA and computed by SPSS version 20. The result of the analysis indicated that combining Scripting and Talking Chips strategy could make students’ speaking achievement better.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

European Journal of Development Research DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-

CiteScore

5.70

自引率

4.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Journal of Development Research (EJDR) redefines and modernises what international development is, recognising the many schools of thought on what human development constitutes. It encourages debate between competing approaches to understanding global development and international social development. The journal is multidisciplinary and welcomes papers that are rooted in any mixture of fields including (but not limited to): development studies, international studies, social policy, sociology, politics, economics, anthropology, education, sustainability, business and management. EJDR explicitly links with development studies, being hosted by European Association of Development Institutes (EADI) and its various initiatives. As a double-blind peer-reviewed academic journal, we particularly welcome submissions that improve our conceptual understanding of international development processes, or submissions that propose policy and developmental tools by analysing empirical evidence, whether qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or anecdotal (data use in the journal ranges broadly from narratives and transcripts, through ethnographic and mixed data, to quantitative and survey data). The research methods used in the journal''s articles make explicit the importance of empirical data and the critical interpretation of findings. Authors can use a mixture of theory and data analysis to expand the possibilities for global development. Submissions must be well-grounded in theory and must also indicate how their findings are relevant to development practitioners in the field and/or policy makers. The journal encourages papers which embody the highest quality standards, and which use an innovative approach. We urge authors who contemplate submitting their work to the EJDR to respond to research already published in this journal, as well as complementary journals and books. We take special efforts to include global voices, and notably voices from the global South. Queries about potential submissions to EJDR can be directed to the Editors. EJDR understands development to be an ongoing process that affects all communities, societies, states and regions: We therefore do not have a geographical bias, but wherever possible prospective authors should seek to highlight how their study has relevance to researchers and practitioners studying development in different environments. Although many of the papers we publish examine the challenges for developing countries, we recognize that there are important lessons to be derived from the experiences of regions in the developed world. The EJDR is print-published 6 times a year, in a mix of regular and special theme issues; accepted papers are published on an ongoing basis online. We accept submissions in English and French.