印度、中国和墨西哥质量实践和结果的比较研究

S.Subba Rao, T.S. Raghunathan, Luis E. Solis
{"title":"印度、中国和墨西哥质量实践和结果的比较研究","authors":"S.Subba Rao,&nbsp;T.S. Raghunathan,&nbsp;Luis E. Solis","doi":"10.1016/S1084-8568(97)90005-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper we compare quality management practices in three different countries: India, China and Mexico. Various constructs representing quality management practices and quality results were conceptualized. Using a questionnaire survey instrument, data was collected in India, China, and Mexico. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to analyze the data. The MANOVA results point to statistically significant differences with respect to quality practices among these countries. Top management support turned out to be a very significant factor affecting all quality practices while information and analysis as well quality assurance practices were affected by length of quality experience in organizations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Quality Management","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 235-250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1084-8568(97)90005-5","citationCount":"80","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of quality practices and results in India, China and Mexico\",\"authors\":\"S.Subba Rao,&nbsp;T.S. Raghunathan,&nbsp;Luis E. Solis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1084-8568(97)90005-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper we compare quality management practices in three different countries: India, China and Mexico. Various constructs representing quality management practices and quality results were conceptualized. Using a questionnaire survey instrument, data was collected in India, China, and Mexico. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to analyze the data. The MANOVA results point to statistically significant differences with respect to quality practices among these countries. Top management support turned out to be a very significant factor affecting all quality practices while information and analysis as well quality assurance practices were affected by length of quality experience in organizations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Quality Management\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 235-250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1084-8568(97)90005-5\",\"citationCount\":\"80\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Quality Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084856897900055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Quality Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084856897900055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 80

摘要

在本文中,我们比较了三个不同国家的质量管理实践:印度、中国和墨西哥。对代表质量管理实践和质量结果的各种结构进行了概念化。使用问卷调查工具,在印度、中国和墨西哥收集数据。采用多变量方差分析(MANOVA)对数据进行分析。方差分析结果表明,这些国家在质量实践方面存在统计学上的显著差异。最高管理层的支持是影响所有质量实践的一个非常重要的因素,而信息和分析以及质量保证实践受到组织质量经验长度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study of quality practices and results in India, China and Mexico

In this paper we compare quality management practices in three different countries: India, China and Mexico. Various constructs representing quality management practices and quality results were conceptualized. Using a questionnaire survey instrument, data was collected in India, China, and Mexico. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to analyze the data. The MANOVA results point to statistically significant differences with respect to quality practices among these countries. Top management support turned out to be a very significant factor affecting all quality practices while information and analysis as well quality assurance practices were affected by length of quality experience in organizations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信