对当前新西兰社会保险政策发展的批判性思考

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
S. Chapple, Michael Fletcher
{"title":"对当前新西兰社会保险政策发展的批判性思考","authors":"S. Chapple, Michael Fletcher","doi":"10.26686/pq.v17i4.7311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent surprising announcements about the development of a social unemployment insurance (SUI) system by the Labour government are critically considered. Introducing SUI represents a major philosophical lurch from a welfare system mainly about family poverty alleviation towards one which has a stronger focus on market income replacement for individual low- and middle-income earners. We critically consider the policy process, the reasons why an SUI system might be desirable, and several alternative solutions to the likely proposal. We express scepticism about the democratic credentials of the process thus far and conclude that a persuasive case for such major reform has not yet been made.","PeriodicalId":43642,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Policy Quarterly","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Consideration of Current Social Insurance Policy Developments in New Zealand\",\"authors\":\"S. Chapple, Michael Fletcher\",\"doi\":\"10.26686/pq.v17i4.7311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent surprising announcements about the development of a social unemployment insurance (SUI) system by the Labour government are critically considered. Introducing SUI represents a major philosophical lurch from a welfare system mainly about family poverty alleviation towards one which has a stronger focus on market income replacement for individual low- and middle-income earners. We critically consider the policy process, the reasons why an SUI system might be desirable, and several alternative solutions to the likely proposal. We express scepticism about the democratic credentials of the process thus far and conclude that a persuasive case for such major reform has not yet been made.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Policy Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Policy Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v17i4.7311\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Policy Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v17i4.7311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工党政府最近关于发展社会失业保险(SUI)制度的令人惊讶的公告受到了批判性的考虑。引进社会福利制度代表着一个重大的哲学转变,从一个主要关于减轻家庭贫困的福利制度转向一个更注重市场收入替代个人低收入和中等收入者的福利制度。我们批判性地考虑政策过程,SUI系统可能是可取的原因,以及可能建议的几种替代解决方案。我们对迄今为止这一进程的民主凭据表示怀疑,并得出结论认为,尚未提出进行这种重大改革的令人信服的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Critical Consideration of Current Social Insurance Policy Developments in New Zealand
Recent surprising announcements about the development of a social unemployment insurance (SUI) system by the Labour government are critically considered. Introducing SUI represents a major philosophical lurch from a welfare system mainly about family poverty alleviation towards one which has a stronger focus on market income replacement for individual low- and middle-income earners. We critically consider the policy process, the reasons why an SUI system might be desirable, and several alternative solutions to the likely proposal. We express scepticism about the democratic credentials of the process thus far and conclude that a persuasive case for such major reform has not yet been made.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Policy Quarterly
Turkish Policy Quarterly POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信