精料选择用牧草的收集、处理和分析

M. Lashley, M. C. Chitwood, C. Harper, C. Moorman, C. DePerno
{"title":"精料选择用牧草的收集、处理和分析","authors":"M. Lashley, M. C. Chitwood, C. Harper, C. Moorman, C. DePerno","doi":"10.2461/WBP.2014.10.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forage collection practices must be consistent among studies for accurate and comparable results. Forage samples should be collected in the context of the feeding habits of the focal species to accurately represent available nutrition, but inconsistent handling and analysis of forages also could bias nutrient reports. Previously described methods of forage collection based on agricultural protocols are adequate for studying diets of intermediate browsers and grazers, but likely are inaccurate for application to concentrate selectors. More specifically, the agricultural protocols generally underestimate nutritional quality for concentrate selectors because leaf collections avoid the physiologically young plant parts that concentrate selectors seek. Furthermore, agricultural drying practices are designed for forage samples lower in water content than the young plant parts selected by concentrate selectors, which may create inaccuracies in subsequent nutrient assays. Also, laboratory methods and accuracy may affect nutrient reports in addition to collection and handling procedures. As a whole, improper collection, handling, or analysis of forages leads to improper conclusions and invalid comparisons across studies. Herein, we review protocols reported in empirical studies from agricultural and wildlife research and provide guidelines for standardizing collection, handling, and analyses of forages with the goal of providing a framework for researchers studying diets of concentrate selectors and related nutritional indices. These protocols will ensure valid conclusions are drawn and allow valid comparisons among related studies in future research.","PeriodicalId":89522,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)","volume":"2 1","pages":"29-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collection, Handling and Analysis of Forages for Concentrate Selectors\",\"authors\":\"M. Lashley, M. C. Chitwood, C. Harper, C. Moorman, C. DePerno\",\"doi\":\"10.2461/WBP.2014.10.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Forage collection practices must be consistent among studies for accurate and comparable results. Forage samples should be collected in the context of the feeding habits of the focal species to accurately represent available nutrition, but inconsistent handling and analysis of forages also could bias nutrient reports. Previously described methods of forage collection based on agricultural protocols are adequate for studying diets of intermediate browsers and grazers, but likely are inaccurate for application to concentrate selectors. More specifically, the agricultural protocols generally underestimate nutritional quality for concentrate selectors because leaf collections avoid the physiologically young plant parts that concentrate selectors seek. Furthermore, agricultural drying practices are designed for forage samples lower in water content than the young plant parts selected by concentrate selectors, which may create inaccuracies in subsequent nutrient assays. Also, laboratory methods and accuracy may affect nutrient reports in addition to collection and handling procedures. As a whole, improper collection, handling, or analysis of forages leads to improper conclusions and invalid comparisons across studies. Herein, we review protocols reported in empirical studies from agricultural and wildlife research and provide guidelines for standardizing collection, handling, and analyses of forages with the goal of providing a framework for researchers studying diets of concentrate selectors and related nutritional indices. These protocols will ensure valid conclusions are drawn and allow valid comparisons among related studies in future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"29-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2461/WBP.2014.10.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2461/WBP.2014.10.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

牧草收集实践必须在研究中保持一致,以获得准确和可比较的结果。采集饲料样品时应考虑焦点物种的摄食习性,以准确反映可利用营养,但对饲料处理和分析的不一致也可能使营养报告产生偏差。先前描述的基于农业协议的饲料收集方法对于研究中间浏览动物和食草动物的饮食是足够的,但对于集中选择者的应用可能是不准确的。更具体地说,农业协议通常低估了浓缩物选择器的营养质量,因为叶子收集避免了浓缩物选择器寻找的生理上年轻的植物部分。此外,农业干燥方法是为含水量低于浓缩选择器选择的幼嫩植物部分的饲料样品设计的,这可能会在随后的营养分析中造成不准确。此外,除了收集和处理程序外,实验室方法和准确性也可能影响营养素报告。总的来说,不适当的收集、处理或分析牧草会导致不正确的结论和无效的研究比较。在此,我们回顾了农业和野生动物研究的实证研究报告,并提供了标准化采集、处理和分析牧草的指南,旨在为研究精料选择器的日粮和相关营养指标的研究人员提供一个框架。这些方案将确保得出有效的结论,并允许在未来的研究中对相关研究进行有效的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collection, Handling and Analysis of Forages for Concentrate Selectors
Forage collection practices must be consistent among studies for accurate and comparable results. Forage samples should be collected in the context of the feeding habits of the focal species to accurately represent available nutrition, but inconsistent handling and analysis of forages also could bias nutrient reports. Previously described methods of forage collection based on agricultural protocols are adequate for studying diets of intermediate browsers and grazers, but likely are inaccurate for application to concentrate selectors. More specifically, the agricultural protocols generally underestimate nutritional quality for concentrate selectors because leaf collections avoid the physiologically young plant parts that concentrate selectors seek. Furthermore, agricultural drying practices are designed for forage samples lower in water content than the young plant parts selected by concentrate selectors, which may create inaccuracies in subsequent nutrient assays. Also, laboratory methods and accuracy may affect nutrient reports in addition to collection and handling procedures. As a whole, improper collection, handling, or analysis of forages leads to improper conclusions and invalid comparisons across studies. Herein, we review protocols reported in empirical studies from agricultural and wildlife research and provide guidelines for standardizing collection, handling, and analyses of forages with the goal of providing a framework for researchers studying diets of concentrate selectors and related nutritional indices. These protocols will ensure valid conclusions are drawn and allow valid comparisons among related studies in future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信