生物类似药的安全性问题

Abdul Kader Mohiuddin
{"title":"生物类似药的安全性问题","authors":"Abdul Kader Mohiuddin","doi":"10.23880/ACT-16000158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biologics are complex molecules that are manufactured using living cells and used in the treatment of several chronic inflammatory diseases and cancer [1]. As biosimilars offer the potential for lower acquisition costs versus the originator biologic, evaluating the economic implications of the introduction of biosimilars is of interest [2]. As the costs of biologics are high, biosimilars offer the potential of greater choice and value, increased patient access to treatment, and the potential for improved outcomes [3]. By providing more-affordable treatment options and introducing price competition to the market, biosimilar medicines can generate significant savings. The cumulative savings between 2016 and 2020 in the EU5 and the USA are estimated to range between 49 billion Euros and 98 billion Euros [4]. The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) grants 12 years of exclusivity to originator or reference biologics; therefore, by law, the FDA cannot approve a biosimilar until this period has elapsed [2,5]. Patents for many branded biologics will expire during the next few years, allowing biosimilars manufacturers to seek FDA approval for generic versions of these agents [2]. The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), which is part of the patient protection and affordable care act, were passed to facilitate the entry of biosimilar drugs into the market [6]. There has been an increasing trend toward the approval of biosimilars in the USA and the EU. The original goal of legislation to approve biosimilars through a fast-track process that would lead to more competition and price reductions is starting to be realized [7]. According to the BPCIA, a biologic product is deemed biosimilar to the already approved, originator biologic if the available data show that it is highly similar to the reference product, “notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components, and there are no clinically significant differences between the biologic product and the reference product in terms of safety, purity, and potency of the product” [8-10]. Approval of biosimilars requires comprehensive assessment of all stages of the research and development process, including evaluation of analytical, preclinical and clinical data, to establish bio-similarity to their reference products. The goal of biosimilar comparability studies is not to re-establish efficacy and safety for the proposed biosimilar, but to demonstrate similarity to the reference product [11,12]. The biosimilar development pathway consists of a comprehensive comparability exercise between the biosimilar candidate and the reference product, primarily focusing on data from analytical studies. Clinical studies for biosimilar candidates follow a different design to those for a new biological, as the aim is not to independently establish clinical benefit, but to confirm bio-similarity between the two agents [4]. Physician awareness and perceptions towards biosimilars are important factors in their adoption to clinical practice [11]. A biosimilar applicant has to provide a considerably larger package of comparative data than a generic applicant to ensure that the biosimilar can indeed rely, for the purpose of licensing, on the efficacy and safety experience gained with the reference product. While for a generic, the demonstration of similar in vitro dissolution and in vivo bioavailability (so-called bioequivalence) is sufficient to conclude therapeutic equivalence with the reference product, for a biosimilar, comparable physicochemical, biological and functional characteristics as well as efficacy and safety/immunogenicity with the reference product must be demonstrated. In addition, unlike generics, any extrapolation to other indications of the reference product must be scientifically justified [12]. The approval of biosimilars is a highly regulated and detailed process. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US FDA guidance documents stipulate that a biosimilar manufacturer must perform a series of extensive similarity assessments in order to demonstrate bio-similarity to the reference product, and to ultimately gain regulatory approval or licensure [13]. Difference between generic biotech and biosimilar products are: a) Biologic medicines are not made using a set of standard materials, but are developed using unique biological systems and living cells. As a result, the active ingredient is impossible to recreate exactly and the selected cell lines from which the biologic medicine originates are unique to each manufacturer b) The manufacturing process for biologic medicines is generally more complex than manufacturing processes for chemical drugs. Unlike small molecule drugs, biologic medicines are produced in genetically-engineered living cells that are sustained in a highly-controlled environment. Abdul Kader Mohiuddin*","PeriodicalId":15189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutic Oncology","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety Issues of Biosimilar Products\",\"authors\":\"Abdul Kader Mohiuddin\",\"doi\":\"10.23880/ACT-16000158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Biologics are complex molecules that are manufactured using living cells and used in the treatment of several chronic inflammatory diseases and cancer [1]. As biosimilars offer the potential for lower acquisition costs versus the originator biologic, evaluating the economic implications of the introduction of biosimilars is of interest [2]. As the costs of biologics are high, biosimilars offer the potential of greater choice and value, increased patient access to treatment, and the potential for improved outcomes [3]. By providing more-affordable treatment options and introducing price competition to the market, biosimilar medicines can generate significant savings. The cumulative savings between 2016 and 2020 in the EU5 and the USA are estimated to range between 49 billion Euros and 98 billion Euros [4]. The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) grants 12 years of exclusivity to originator or reference biologics; therefore, by law, the FDA cannot approve a biosimilar until this period has elapsed [2,5]. Patents for many branded biologics will expire during the next few years, allowing biosimilars manufacturers to seek FDA approval for generic versions of these agents [2]. The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), which is part of the patient protection and affordable care act, were passed to facilitate the entry of biosimilar drugs into the market [6]. There has been an increasing trend toward the approval of biosimilars in the USA and the EU. The original goal of legislation to approve biosimilars through a fast-track process that would lead to more competition and price reductions is starting to be realized [7]. According to the BPCIA, a biologic product is deemed biosimilar to the already approved, originator biologic if the available data show that it is highly similar to the reference product, “notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components, and there are no clinically significant differences between the biologic product and the reference product in terms of safety, purity, and potency of the product” [8-10]. Approval of biosimilars requires comprehensive assessment of all stages of the research and development process, including evaluation of analytical, preclinical and clinical data, to establish bio-similarity to their reference products. The goal of biosimilar comparability studies is not to re-establish efficacy and safety for the proposed biosimilar, but to demonstrate similarity to the reference product [11,12]. The biosimilar development pathway consists of a comprehensive comparability exercise between the biosimilar candidate and the reference product, primarily focusing on data from analytical studies. Clinical studies for biosimilar candidates follow a different design to those for a new biological, as the aim is not to independently establish clinical benefit, but to confirm bio-similarity between the two agents [4]. Physician awareness and perceptions towards biosimilars are important factors in their adoption to clinical practice [11]. A biosimilar applicant has to provide a considerably larger package of comparative data than a generic applicant to ensure that the biosimilar can indeed rely, for the purpose of licensing, on the efficacy and safety experience gained with the reference product. While for a generic, the demonstration of similar in vitro dissolution and in vivo bioavailability (so-called bioequivalence) is sufficient to conclude therapeutic equivalence with the reference product, for a biosimilar, comparable physicochemical, biological and functional characteristics as well as efficacy and safety/immunogenicity with the reference product must be demonstrated. In addition, unlike generics, any extrapolation to other indications of the reference product must be scientifically justified [12]. The approval of biosimilars is a highly regulated and detailed process. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US FDA guidance documents stipulate that a biosimilar manufacturer must perform a series of extensive similarity assessments in order to demonstrate bio-similarity to the reference product, and to ultimately gain regulatory approval or licensure [13]. Difference between generic biotech and biosimilar products are: a) Biologic medicines are not made using a set of standard materials, but are developed using unique biological systems and living cells. As a result, the active ingredient is impossible to recreate exactly and the selected cell lines from which the biologic medicine originates are unique to each manufacturer b) The manufacturing process for biologic medicines is generally more complex than manufacturing processes for chemical drugs. Unlike small molecule drugs, biologic medicines are produced in genetically-engineered living cells that are sustained in a highly-controlled environment. Abdul Kader Mohiuddin*\",\"PeriodicalId\":15189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutic Oncology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutic Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23880/ACT-16000158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/ACT-16000158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

生物制剂是用活细胞制造的复杂分子,用于治疗多种慢性炎症性疾病和癌症[1]。由于生物仿制药与原研药相比具有更低的获取成本的潜力,因此评估生物仿制药引入的经济影响具有重要意义[2]。由于生物制剂的成本很高,生物仿制药提供了更多的选择和价值,增加了患者获得治疗的机会,并有可能改善结果[3]。通过提供更负担得起的治疗选择和在市场上引入价格竞争,生物仿制药可以节省大量费用。据估计,2016年至2020年,欧盟五国和美国的累计节约成本将在490亿欧元至980亿欧元之间[4]。《生物制剂价格竞争与创新法案》(BPCIA)授予原研生物制剂或参考生物制剂12年的专有权;因此,根据法律,FDA不能批准生物仿制药,直到这段时间过去[2,5]。许多品牌生物制剂的专利将在未来几年内到期,这使得生物仿制药制造商可以寻求FDA批准这些药物的仿制版本[2]。《生物制剂价格竞争与创新法案》(BPCIA)是《患者保护和平价医疗法案》的一部分,通过该法案是为了促进生物仿制药进入市场[6]。在美国和欧盟,生物仿制药的批准呈上升趋势。立法批准生物仿制药的最初目标是通过快速通道程序,从而导致更多的竞争和价格降低,这一目标正在开始实现[7]。根据BPCIA,如果现有数据显示生物制品与参比产品高度相似,则生物制品被视为与已批准的原研生物制品具有生物类似性,“尽管临床非活性成分存在微小差异,并且生物制品与参比产品在安全性、纯度和效力方面没有临床显着差异”[8-10]。生物仿制药的批准需要对研发过程的所有阶段进行全面评估,包括对分析、临床前和临床数据的评估,以建立与其参考产品的生物相似性。生物类似药可比性研究的目的不是重新确定所提出的生物类似药的有效性和安全性,而是证明与参比产品的相似性[11,12]。生物类似药的开发途径包括对候选生物类似药和参比产品进行全面的可比性测试,主要关注分析研究的数据。生物仿制药候选药物的临床研究与新生物药物的临床研究采用不同的设计,因为其目的不是独立确定临床益处,而是确认两种药物之间的生物相似性[4]。医生对生物仿制药的认识和认知是将其应用于临床实践的重要因素[11]。生物仿制药申请人必须提供比仿制药申请人大得多的比较数据包,以确保生物仿制药确实可以依靠从参考产品获得的疗效和安全性经验来获得许可。对于仿制药,证明类似的体外溶出度和体内生物利用度(所谓的生物等效性)足以得出与参比产品治疗等效的结论,而对于生物仿制药,必须证明与参比产品具有可比性的物理化学、生物学和功能特性以及有效性和安全性/免疫原性。此外,与仿制药不同,任何对参考产品其他适应症的推断都必须有科学依据[12]。生物仿制药的批准是一个高度规范和详细的过程。欧洲药品管理局(EMA)和美国FDA指导文件规定,生物仿制药制造商必须进行一系列广泛的相似性评估,以证明与参考产品的生物相似性,并最终获得监管部门的批准或许可[13]。生物技术仿制药和生物仿制药的区别在于:a)生物药品不是使用一套标准材料制成的,而是使用独特的生物系统和活细胞开发的。因此,活性成分不可能精确地再造,并且每个制造商所选择的源自生物药物的细胞系是独一无二的。b)生物药物的生产过程通常比化学药物的生产过程更复杂。与小分子药物不同,生物药物是在基因工程活细胞中生产的,这些活细胞在高度控制的环境中持续存在。Abdul Kader Mohiuddin*
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety Issues of Biosimilar Products
Biologics are complex molecules that are manufactured using living cells and used in the treatment of several chronic inflammatory diseases and cancer [1]. As biosimilars offer the potential for lower acquisition costs versus the originator biologic, evaluating the economic implications of the introduction of biosimilars is of interest [2]. As the costs of biologics are high, biosimilars offer the potential of greater choice and value, increased patient access to treatment, and the potential for improved outcomes [3]. By providing more-affordable treatment options and introducing price competition to the market, biosimilar medicines can generate significant savings. The cumulative savings between 2016 and 2020 in the EU5 and the USA are estimated to range between 49 billion Euros and 98 billion Euros [4]. The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) grants 12 years of exclusivity to originator or reference biologics; therefore, by law, the FDA cannot approve a biosimilar until this period has elapsed [2,5]. Patents for many branded biologics will expire during the next few years, allowing biosimilars manufacturers to seek FDA approval for generic versions of these agents [2]. The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), which is part of the patient protection and affordable care act, were passed to facilitate the entry of biosimilar drugs into the market [6]. There has been an increasing trend toward the approval of biosimilars in the USA and the EU. The original goal of legislation to approve biosimilars through a fast-track process that would lead to more competition and price reductions is starting to be realized [7]. According to the BPCIA, a biologic product is deemed biosimilar to the already approved, originator biologic if the available data show that it is highly similar to the reference product, “notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components, and there are no clinically significant differences between the biologic product and the reference product in terms of safety, purity, and potency of the product” [8-10]. Approval of biosimilars requires comprehensive assessment of all stages of the research and development process, including evaluation of analytical, preclinical and clinical data, to establish bio-similarity to their reference products. The goal of biosimilar comparability studies is not to re-establish efficacy and safety for the proposed biosimilar, but to demonstrate similarity to the reference product [11,12]. The biosimilar development pathway consists of a comprehensive comparability exercise between the biosimilar candidate and the reference product, primarily focusing on data from analytical studies. Clinical studies for biosimilar candidates follow a different design to those for a new biological, as the aim is not to independently establish clinical benefit, but to confirm bio-similarity between the two agents [4]. Physician awareness and perceptions towards biosimilars are important factors in their adoption to clinical practice [11]. A biosimilar applicant has to provide a considerably larger package of comparative data than a generic applicant to ensure that the biosimilar can indeed rely, for the purpose of licensing, on the efficacy and safety experience gained with the reference product. While for a generic, the demonstration of similar in vitro dissolution and in vivo bioavailability (so-called bioequivalence) is sufficient to conclude therapeutic equivalence with the reference product, for a biosimilar, comparable physicochemical, biological and functional characteristics as well as efficacy and safety/immunogenicity with the reference product must be demonstrated. In addition, unlike generics, any extrapolation to other indications of the reference product must be scientifically justified [12]. The approval of biosimilars is a highly regulated and detailed process. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US FDA guidance documents stipulate that a biosimilar manufacturer must perform a series of extensive similarity assessments in order to demonstrate bio-similarity to the reference product, and to ultimately gain regulatory approval or licensure [13]. Difference between generic biotech and biosimilar products are: a) Biologic medicines are not made using a set of standard materials, but are developed using unique biological systems and living cells. As a result, the active ingredient is impossible to recreate exactly and the selected cell lines from which the biologic medicine originates are unique to each manufacturer b) The manufacturing process for biologic medicines is generally more complex than manufacturing processes for chemical drugs. Unlike small molecule drugs, biologic medicines are produced in genetically-engineered living cells that are sustained in a highly-controlled environment. Abdul Kader Mohiuddin*
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信