森林中智能手机定位的进展:双频接收器和原始GNSS数据

IF 3 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Forestry Pub Date : 2020-09-07 DOI:10.1093/forestry/cpaa032
J. Tomaštík, J. Chudá, D. Tunák, F. Chudý, M. Kardoš
{"title":"森林中智能手机定位的进展:双频接收器和原始GNSS数据","authors":"J. Tomaštík, J. Chudá, D. Tunák, F. Chudý, M. Kardoš","doi":"10.1093/forestry/cpaa032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Smartphones with their capability to receive Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) signals can be currently considered the most common devices used for positioning tasks, including forestry applications. This study focuses on possible improvements related to two crucial changes implemented into Android smartphone positioning in the last 3 years – dual-frequency (L1/L5) GNSS receivers and the possibility of recording raw GNSS data. The study comprises three experiments: (1) real-time measurements of individual points, (2) real-time recording of trajectories, and (3) post-processing of raw GNSS data provided by the smartphone receiver. The real-time tests were conducted using final positions provided by the internal receiver, i.e. without further processing or averaging. The test on individual points has proven that the Xiaomi Mi8 smartphone with a multi-constellation, dual-frequency receiver was the only device whose accuracy was not significantly different from single-frequency mapping-grade receiver under any conditions. The horizontal accuracy of most devices was lower during leaf-on season (root mean square errors between 5.41 and 12.55 m) than during leaf-off season (4.10–11.44 m), and the accuracy was significantly better under open-area conditions (1.72–4.51 m) for all tested devices when compared with forest conditions. Results of the second experiment with track recording suggest that smartphone receivers are better suited for dynamic applications – the mean shift between reference and measured trajectories varied from 1.23 to 5.98 m under leaf-on conditions. Post-processing of the raw GNSS data in the third experiment brought very variable results. We achieved centimetre-level accuracy under open-area conditions; however, in forest, the accuracies varied from meters to tens of meters. Observed loss of the signal strength in the forest represented ~20 per cent of the open-area value. Overall, the multi-constellation, dual-frequency receiver provided more robust and accurate positional solutions compared with single-frequency smartphones. Applicability of the raw GNSS data must be further studied especially in forests, as the provided data are highly susceptible to multipath and other GNSS adverse effects.","PeriodicalId":12342,"journal":{"name":"Forestry","volume":"140 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advances in smartphone positioning in forests: dual-frequency receivers and raw GNSS data\",\"authors\":\"J. Tomaštík, J. Chudá, D. Tunák, F. Chudý, M. Kardoš\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/forestry/cpaa032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Smartphones with their capability to receive Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) signals can be currently considered the most common devices used for positioning tasks, including forestry applications. This study focuses on possible improvements related to two crucial changes implemented into Android smartphone positioning in the last 3 years – dual-frequency (L1/L5) GNSS receivers and the possibility of recording raw GNSS data. The study comprises three experiments: (1) real-time measurements of individual points, (2) real-time recording of trajectories, and (3) post-processing of raw GNSS data provided by the smartphone receiver. The real-time tests were conducted using final positions provided by the internal receiver, i.e. without further processing or averaging. The test on individual points has proven that the Xiaomi Mi8 smartphone with a multi-constellation, dual-frequency receiver was the only device whose accuracy was not significantly different from single-frequency mapping-grade receiver under any conditions. The horizontal accuracy of most devices was lower during leaf-on season (root mean square errors between 5.41 and 12.55 m) than during leaf-off season (4.10–11.44 m), and the accuracy was significantly better under open-area conditions (1.72–4.51 m) for all tested devices when compared with forest conditions. Results of the second experiment with track recording suggest that smartphone receivers are better suited for dynamic applications – the mean shift between reference and measured trajectories varied from 1.23 to 5.98 m under leaf-on conditions. Post-processing of the raw GNSS data in the third experiment brought very variable results. We achieved centimetre-level accuracy under open-area conditions; however, in forest, the accuracies varied from meters to tens of meters. Observed loss of the signal strength in the forest represented ~20 per cent of the open-area value. Overall, the multi-constellation, dual-frequency receiver provided more robust and accurate positional solutions compared with single-frequency smartphones. Applicability of the raw GNSS data must be further studied especially in forests, as the provided data are highly susceptible to multipath and other GNSS adverse effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forestry\",\"volume\":\"140 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpaa032\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpaa032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

能够接收全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)信号的智能手机目前被认为是用于定位任务的最常用设备,包括林业应用。本研究的重点是在过去3年中,Android智能手机定位的两个关键变化——双频(L1/L5) GNSS接收器和记录原始GNSS数据的可能性——可能带来的改进。该研究包括三个实验:(1)单个点的实时测量,(2)轨迹的实时记录,(3)智能手机接收器提供的GNSS原始数据的后处理。实时测试使用内部接收器提供的最终位置进行,即没有进一步处理或平均。单点测试表明,在任何条件下,只有配备多星座双频接收机的小米Mi8智能手机与单频地图级接收机的精度没有显著差异。大多数装置的水平精度在开叶季(均方根误差在5.41 ~ 12.55 m之间)低于落叶季(4.10 ~ 11.44 m),所有测试装置在开放区域条件下的精度(1.72 ~ 4.51 m)显著优于森林条件。第二个跟踪记录实验的结果表明,智能手机接收器更适合动态应用——在叶片打开的条件下,参考和测量轨迹之间的平均位移从1.23米到5.98米不等。第三次实验对原始GNSS数据进行了后处理,结果变化很大。我们在开放区域条件下实现了厘米级精度;然而,在森林中,精度从几米到几十米不等。森林中观测到的信号强度损失约占开阔区域值的20%。总体而言,与单频智能手机相比,多星座双频接收器提供了更强大、更准确的定位解决方案。必须进一步研究原始GNSS数据的适用性,特别是在森林中,因为所提供的数据极易受到多径和其他GNSS不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advances in smartphone positioning in forests: dual-frequency receivers and raw GNSS data
Smartphones with their capability to receive Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) signals can be currently considered the most common devices used for positioning tasks, including forestry applications. This study focuses on possible improvements related to two crucial changes implemented into Android smartphone positioning in the last 3 years – dual-frequency (L1/L5) GNSS receivers and the possibility of recording raw GNSS data. The study comprises three experiments: (1) real-time measurements of individual points, (2) real-time recording of trajectories, and (3) post-processing of raw GNSS data provided by the smartphone receiver. The real-time tests were conducted using final positions provided by the internal receiver, i.e. without further processing or averaging. The test on individual points has proven that the Xiaomi Mi8 smartphone with a multi-constellation, dual-frequency receiver was the only device whose accuracy was not significantly different from single-frequency mapping-grade receiver under any conditions. The horizontal accuracy of most devices was lower during leaf-on season (root mean square errors between 5.41 and 12.55 m) than during leaf-off season (4.10–11.44 m), and the accuracy was significantly better under open-area conditions (1.72–4.51 m) for all tested devices when compared with forest conditions. Results of the second experiment with track recording suggest that smartphone receivers are better suited for dynamic applications – the mean shift between reference and measured trajectories varied from 1.23 to 5.98 m under leaf-on conditions. Post-processing of the raw GNSS data in the third experiment brought very variable results. We achieved centimetre-level accuracy under open-area conditions; however, in forest, the accuracies varied from meters to tens of meters. Observed loss of the signal strength in the forest represented ~20 per cent of the open-area value. Overall, the multi-constellation, dual-frequency receiver provided more robust and accurate positional solutions compared with single-frequency smartphones. Applicability of the raw GNSS data must be further studied especially in forests, as the provided data are highly susceptible to multipath and other GNSS adverse effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forestry
Forestry 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
47
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is inclusive of all subjects, geographical zones and study locations, including trees in urban environments, plantations and natural forests. We welcome papers that consider economic, environmental and social factors and, in particular, studies that take an integrated approach to sustainable management. In considering suitability for publication, attention is given to the originality of contributions and their likely impact on policy and practice, as well as their contribution to the development of knowledge. Special Issues - each year one edition of Forestry will be a Special Issue and will focus on one subject in detail; this will usually be by publication of the proceedings of an international meeting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信