感官评价与电子鼻法在干啤酒花香气评价中的比较

J. Štefániková, V. Nagyová, Matej Hynšt, Dominika Kudláková, J. Árvay, Štefan Dráb
{"title":"感官评价与电子鼻法在干啤酒花香气评价中的比较","authors":"J. Štefániková, V. Nagyová, Matej Hynšt, Dominika Kudláková, J. Árvay, Štefan Dráb","doi":"10.18832/kp2020.66.224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this work was to compare sensory evaluation and electronic nose technology used to assess aromas in dry hopped beers. An electronic nose based on gas chromatography was used for the first time. Hops varieties Amarillo, Cascade, Chinook, Kazbek and Mandarina Bavaria were used for the production of dry hopped beers and the Sladek variety was used for the control sample. The basic characteristics of the beers were determined, and the sensory evaluation performed by selected assessors was compared to the sensory assay using an electronic nose. Assessment of the aroma profile of dry hopped beers shows that the basic flavours of these beers, such as worty, yeasty and hoppy, were suppressed. Compared to the control sample, a significant grapefruit flavour was noted by the evaluators in Kazbek and Chinook beer samples. The most prominent determinant, compared to the control sample, was in general the citrus aroma. Based on the results of the principal component analysis, it can be concluded that there were statistically significant differences between the individual dry hopped beers and between them and the control sample with the exception of beers dry hopped with hops of the Amarillo and Cascade variety, which was also confirmed by the results of sensory evaluation (approximately the same scoring of the monitored descriptors).","PeriodicalId":17834,"journal":{"name":"Kvasny prumysl","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of sensory evaluation and an electronic nose assay in the assessment of aroma in dry hopped beers\",\"authors\":\"J. Štefániková, V. Nagyová, Matej Hynšt, Dominika Kudláková, J. Árvay, Štefan Dráb\",\"doi\":\"10.18832/kp2020.66.224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this work was to compare sensory evaluation and electronic nose technology used to assess aromas in dry hopped beers. An electronic nose based on gas chromatography was used for the first time. Hops varieties Amarillo, Cascade, Chinook, Kazbek and Mandarina Bavaria were used for the production of dry hopped beers and the Sladek variety was used for the control sample. The basic characteristics of the beers were determined, and the sensory evaluation performed by selected assessors was compared to the sensory assay using an electronic nose. Assessment of the aroma profile of dry hopped beers shows that the basic flavours of these beers, such as worty, yeasty and hoppy, were suppressed. Compared to the control sample, a significant grapefruit flavour was noted by the evaluators in Kazbek and Chinook beer samples. The most prominent determinant, compared to the control sample, was in general the citrus aroma. Based on the results of the principal component analysis, it can be concluded that there were statistically significant differences between the individual dry hopped beers and between them and the control sample with the exception of beers dry hopped with hops of the Amarillo and Cascade variety, which was also confirmed by the results of sensory evaluation (approximately the same scoring of the monitored descriptors).\",\"PeriodicalId\":17834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kvasny prumysl\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kvasny prumysl\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18832/kp2020.66.224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kvasny prumysl","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18832/kp2020.66.224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

这项工作的目的是比较感官评价和电子鼻技术用于评估干啤酒花的香味。首次使用了基于气相色谱的电子鼻。用阿马里洛、喀斯喀特、奇努克、卡兹别克和曼达里纳巴伐利亚啤酒花品种生产干啤酒花啤酒,用斯莱德克品种作为对照样品。确定了啤酒的基本特征,并将选定的评估人员进行的感官评估与使用电子鼻的感官分析进行比较。对干啤酒花啤酒的香气特征的评估表明,这些啤酒的基本风味,如麦芽味、酵母味和啤酒花味,被抑制了。与对照样品相比,卡兹别克和奇努克啤酒样品中有明显的葡萄柚味。与对照样品相比,最显著的决定因素通常是柑橘的香气。根据主成分分析的结果,可以得出结论,除了用阿马里洛和Cascade品种的啤酒花干跳的啤酒外,个体干跳啤酒与对照样品之间存在统计学显著差异,这也得到了感官评价结果的证实(监测描述符的得分大致相同)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of sensory evaluation and an electronic nose assay in the assessment of aroma in dry hopped beers
The aim of this work was to compare sensory evaluation and electronic nose technology used to assess aromas in dry hopped beers. An electronic nose based on gas chromatography was used for the first time. Hops varieties Amarillo, Cascade, Chinook, Kazbek and Mandarina Bavaria were used for the production of dry hopped beers and the Sladek variety was used for the control sample. The basic characteristics of the beers were determined, and the sensory evaluation performed by selected assessors was compared to the sensory assay using an electronic nose. Assessment of the aroma profile of dry hopped beers shows that the basic flavours of these beers, such as worty, yeasty and hoppy, were suppressed. Compared to the control sample, a significant grapefruit flavour was noted by the evaluators in Kazbek and Chinook beer samples. The most prominent determinant, compared to the control sample, was in general the citrus aroma. Based on the results of the principal component analysis, it can be concluded that there were statistically significant differences between the individual dry hopped beers and between them and the control sample with the exception of beers dry hopped with hops of the Amarillo and Cascade variety, which was also confirmed by the results of sensory evaluation (approximately the same scoring of the monitored descriptors).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信