技术说明:低核素浓度下10Be和26Al的加速器质谱分析

IF 2.7 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
K. Wilcken, A. Codilean, R. Fülöp, Steven Kotevski, A. H. Rood, D. Rood, A. Seal, K. Simon
{"title":"技术说明:低核素浓度下10Be和26Al的加速器质谱分析","authors":"K. Wilcken, A. Codilean, R. Fülöp, Steven Kotevski, A. H. Rood, D. Rood, A. Seal, K. Simon","doi":"10.5194/gchron-4-339-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) is currently the standard technique to measure cosmogenic 10Be and 26Al concentrations, but the challenge with measuring low nuclide concentrations is to combine high AMS measurement efficiency with low backgrounds. The current standard measurement setup at ANSTO uses the 3+ charge state with Ar stripper gas at 6 MV for Be and 4 MV for Al, achieving ion transmission through the accelerator for 10Be3+ and 26Al3+ of around 35 % and 40 %, respectively. Traditionally, 26Al measurement uncertainties are larger than those for 10Be. Here, however, we show that 26Al can be measured to similar precision as 10Be even for samples with 26Al / 27Al ratios in the range of 10−15, provided that measurement times are sufficiently long. For example, we can achieve uncertainties of 5 % for 26Al / 27Al ratios around 1×10-14, typical for samples of late Holocene age or samples with long burial histories. We also provide empirical functions between the isotope ratio and achievable measurement precision, which allow predictive capabilities for future projects and serve as a benchmark for inter-laboratory comparisons. For the smallest signals, not only is understanding the source of 10Be or 26Al background events required to select the most appropriate blank correction method but also the impact of the data reduction algorithms on the obtained nuclide concentration becomes pronounced. Here we discuss approaches to background correction and recommend quality assurance practices that guide the most appropriate background correction method. Our sensitivity analysis demonstrates a 30 % difference between different background correction methods for samples with 26Al / 27Al ratios below 10−14. Finally, we show that when the measured signal is small and the number of rare isotope counts is also low, differing 26Al or 10Be concentrations may be obtained from the same data if alternate data reduction algorithms are used. Differences in the resulting isotope concentration can be 50 % or more if only very few (≲ 10) counts were recorded or about 30 % if single measurement is shorter than 10 min. Our study presents a comprehensive method for analysis of cosmogenic 10Be and 26Al samples down to isotope concentrations of a few thousand atoms per gram of sample, which opens the door to new and more varied applications of cosmogenic nuclide analysis.\n","PeriodicalId":12723,"journal":{"name":"Geochronology","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technical note: Accelerator mass spectrometry of <sup>10</sup>Be and <sup>26</sup>Al at low nuclide concentrations\",\"authors\":\"K. Wilcken, A. Codilean, R. Fülöp, Steven Kotevski, A. H. Rood, D. Rood, A. Seal, K. Simon\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/gchron-4-339-2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) is currently the standard technique to measure cosmogenic 10Be and 26Al concentrations, but the challenge with measuring low nuclide concentrations is to combine high AMS measurement efficiency with low backgrounds. The current standard measurement setup at ANSTO uses the 3+ charge state with Ar stripper gas at 6 MV for Be and 4 MV for Al, achieving ion transmission through the accelerator for 10Be3+ and 26Al3+ of around 35 % and 40 %, respectively. Traditionally, 26Al measurement uncertainties are larger than those for 10Be. Here, however, we show that 26Al can be measured to similar precision as 10Be even for samples with 26Al / 27Al ratios in the range of 10−15, provided that measurement times are sufficiently long. For example, we can achieve uncertainties of 5 % for 26Al / 27Al ratios around 1×10-14, typical for samples of late Holocene age or samples with long burial histories. We also provide empirical functions between the isotope ratio and achievable measurement precision, which allow predictive capabilities for future projects and serve as a benchmark for inter-laboratory comparisons. For the smallest signals, not only is understanding the source of 10Be or 26Al background events required to select the most appropriate blank correction method but also the impact of the data reduction algorithms on the obtained nuclide concentration becomes pronounced. Here we discuss approaches to background correction and recommend quality assurance practices that guide the most appropriate background correction method. Our sensitivity analysis demonstrates a 30 % difference between different background correction methods for samples with 26Al / 27Al ratios below 10−14. Finally, we show that when the measured signal is small and the number of rare isotope counts is also low, differing 26Al or 10Be concentrations may be obtained from the same data if alternate data reduction algorithms are used. Differences in the resulting isotope concentration can be 50 % or more if only very few (≲ 10) counts were recorded or about 30 % if single measurement is shorter than 10 min. Our study presents a comprehensive method for analysis of cosmogenic 10Be and 26Al samples down to isotope concentrations of a few thousand atoms per gram of sample, which opens the door to new and more varied applications of cosmogenic nuclide analysis.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":12723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geochronology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geochronology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-339-2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochronology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-339-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要加速器质谱(AMS)是目前测量宇宙源10Be和26Al浓度的标准技术,但测量低核素浓度的挑战是将高AMS测量效率与低背景相结合。目前ANSTO的标准测量装置使用3+电荷状态和Ar剥离气体,分别为6 MV和4 MV的Be和Al,通过加速器,10Be3+和26Al3+的离子透射率分别约为35%和40%。传统上,26Al的测量不确定度大于10Be的测量不确定度。然而,在这里,我们表明,即使对于26Al / 27Al比在10−15范围内的样品,只要测量时间足够长,26Al也可以测量到与10Be相似的精度。例如,我们可以在1×10-14附近获得5%的26Al / 27Al比率的不确定性,这对于全新世晚期或具有较长埋藏历史的样品来说是典型的。我们还提供了同位素比率与可实现的测量精度之间的经验函数,这为未来的项目提供了预测能力,并作为实验室间比较的基准。对于最小的信号,不仅需要了解10Be或26Al背景事件的来源,选择最合适的空白校正方法,而且数据约简算法对获得的核素浓度的影响也变得明显。在这里,我们讨论了背景校正的方法,并推荐了指导最合适的背景校正方法的质量保证实践。我们的灵敏度分析表明,对于26Al / 27Al比低于10−14的样品,不同的背景校正方法之间存在30%的差异。最后,我们表明,当测量信号很小且稀有同位素计数数量也很低时,如果使用交替的数据约简算法,可以从相同的数据中获得不同的26Al或10Be浓度。如果只记录很少的(小于10次)计数,所得到的同位素浓度的差异可以达到50%或更多,如果单次测量时间短于10分钟,则差异约为30%。我们的研究提出了一种综合的方法来分析宇宙起源的10Be和26Al样品,每克样品的同位素浓度低至几千个原子,这为宇宙起源核素分析的新的和更多样化的应用打开了大门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technical note: Accelerator mass spectrometry of 10Be and 26Al at low nuclide concentrations
Abstract. Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) is currently the standard technique to measure cosmogenic 10Be and 26Al concentrations, but the challenge with measuring low nuclide concentrations is to combine high AMS measurement efficiency with low backgrounds. The current standard measurement setup at ANSTO uses the 3+ charge state with Ar stripper gas at 6 MV for Be and 4 MV for Al, achieving ion transmission through the accelerator for 10Be3+ and 26Al3+ of around 35 % and 40 %, respectively. Traditionally, 26Al measurement uncertainties are larger than those for 10Be. Here, however, we show that 26Al can be measured to similar precision as 10Be even for samples with 26Al / 27Al ratios in the range of 10−15, provided that measurement times are sufficiently long. For example, we can achieve uncertainties of 5 % for 26Al / 27Al ratios around 1×10-14, typical for samples of late Holocene age or samples with long burial histories. We also provide empirical functions between the isotope ratio and achievable measurement precision, which allow predictive capabilities for future projects and serve as a benchmark for inter-laboratory comparisons. For the smallest signals, not only is understanding the source of 10Be or 26Al background events required to select the most appropriate blank correction method but also the impact of the data reduction algorithms on the obtained nuclide concentration becomes pronounced. Here we discuss approaches to background correction and recommend quality assurance practices that guide the most appropriate background correction method. Our sensitivity analysis demonstrates a 30 % difference between different background correction methods for samples with 26Al / 27Al ratios below 10−14. Finally, we show that when the measured signal is small and the number of rare isotope counts is also low, differing 26Al or 10Be concentrations may be obtained from the same data if alternate data reduction algorithms are used. Differences in the resulting isotope concentration can be 50 % or more if only very few (≲ 10) counts were recorded or about 30 % if single measurement is shorter than 10 min. Our study presents a comprehensive method for analysis of cosmogenic 10Be and 26Al samples down to isotope concentrations of a few thousand atoms per gram of sample, which opens the door to new and more varied applications of cosmogenic nuclide analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geochronology
Geochronology Earth and Planetary Sciences-Paleontology
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信