阿拉伯联合酋长国高等技术学院提高效率的全系统评估的背景、设计和影响

Marshall Mark Drummond, Matthew A. Robby
{"title":"阿拉伯联合酋长国高等技术学院提高效率的全系统评估的背景、设计和影响","authors":"Marshall Mark Drummond, Matthew A. Robby","doi":"10.4018/ijqaete.2012070101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the use of System-wide Assessments, an innovative initiative to enhance the accountability, quality, and effectiveness within the Higher Colleges of Technology of the United Arab Emirates. The authors review the historic and contemporary influences on college/university assessments and the key forces or factors which have shaped development and need of Outcome Assessments. The paper summarizes the literature on the best practices for assessment and promoting changes. The paper describes the objectives, structures, and processes involved with random use of System-wide Assessments among the 17 Federal colleges. A survey of 80 Deans and Chairs reports the perceptions and ratings of the process and impact of System-wide assessments. The lessons learned are described and inform recommendations for key components of an effective assessment system to promote accountability and improvement in higher education. Findings have significance for leaders of institutions of higher learning throughout the Middle East and the world. DOI: 10.4018/ijqaete.2012070101 2 International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education, 2(3), 1-20, July-September 2012 Copyright © 2012, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. American Colleges and Universities (2002) recommended, for verifying the value of undergraduate education, the reorganization of education and review of assessment results of course outcomes. According to the United States Department of Education (2006), the U.S. Commission on Higher Education’s report in 2006 emphasized for regional accreditation agencies to use assessment to promote performance outcomes over inputs and processes, to use quality assessment data to improve teaching and learning, and to use measures to determine “value added” for students. Dinur and Sherman (2009) reported that “Outcome Assessment (OA) has emerged as the systemic mechanism for academic institutions to demonstrate to their stakeholders their viability as institutions that create and disseminate knowledge” (p. 291). To contextualize the use of System-wide Assessments in the Higher Colleges of Technology (HCT), key literature is summarized to enhance understanding for the historic and contemporary influences on development and use of Outcome Assessments in higher education; the distinguishing characteristics, assumptions, and challenges of assessment systems; and the key lessons and factors associated with effective use of assessments. Additionally, the paper describes the innovative design and use of System-wide Assessments in the HCT; reports on the perceptions of the SWA process, value, and impact; and based on experiences in the HCT, recommendations are offered for increasing the probability of an effective assessment process and system in higher education. EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES The increased focus on educational outcomes has been influenced by a range of factors. According to Meyer and Bushney (2008), Outcome Assessment has arisen because of the perceived failures historically in properly evaluating higher education systems and programs. Lucas and Weber (1998) attributed the increased demand for Outcome Assessment to lowered expectations and standards. The decline in standards and quality has seen a corresponding increase in student grade point averages from grade inflation, as reported by Bond (2009), Johnson (2003), and Millet (2010). Increased use of Outcome Assessment has become necessary because of the lack of meaningful progress for student learning demonstrated on national exams (Kimmel & Marquette, 1998). The increased focus on accountability and assessment of outcomes likewise has arisen because of continued high attrition rates and differential educational outcomes based on socio-economic status and factors of race/ethnicity (Kimmel & Marquette, 1998). The call for greater assessment of outcomes in higher education is related to the perceived failure of institutional effectiveness and the deleterious implications for communities and societies because of the existence of under-prepared and uneducated populations, as described by Kuh and Ikenberry (2009), Nusche (2008), and the U.S. Department of Education (2006).","PeriodicalId":13684,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Qual. Assur. Eng. Technol. Educ.","volume":"14 1","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Context, Design, and Impact of System-Wide Assessments to Enhance Effectiveness in the Higher Colleges of Technology of the United Arab Emirates\",\"authors\":\"Marshall Mark Drummond, Matthew A. Robby\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/ijqaete.2012070101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the use of System-wide Assessments, an innovative initiative to enhance the accountability, quality, and effectiveness within the Higher Colleges of Technology of the United Arab Emirates. The authors review the historic and contemporary influences on college/university assessments and the key forces or factors which have shaped development and need of Outcome Assessments. The paper summarizes the literature on the best practices for assessment and promoting changes. The paper describes the objectives, structures, and processes involved with random use of System-wide Assessments among the 17 Federal colleges. A survey of 80 Deans and Chairs reports the perceptions and ratings of the process and impact of System-wide assessments. The lessons learned are described and inform recommendations for key components of an effective assessment system to promote accountability and improvement in higher education. Findings have significance for leaders of institutions of higher learning throughout the Middle East and the world. DOI: 10.4018/ijqaete.2012070101 2 International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education, 2(3), 1-20, July-September 2012 Copyright © 2012, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. American Colleges and Universities (2002) recommended, for verifying the value of undergraduate education, the reorganization of education and review of assessment results of course outcomes. According to the United States Department of Education (2006), the U.S. Commission on Higher Education’s report in 2006 emphasized for regional accreditation agencies to use assessment to promote performance outcomes over inputs and processes, to use quality assessment data to improve teaching and learning, and to use measures to determine “value added” for students. Dinur and Sherman (2009) reported that “Outcome Assessment (OA) has emerged as the systemic mechanism for academic institutions to demonstrate to their stakeholders their viability as institutions that create and disseminate knowledge” (p. 291). To contextualize the use of System-wide Assessments in the Higher Colleges of Technology (HCT), key literature is summarized to enhance understanding for the historic and contemporary influences on development and use of Outcome Assessments in higher education; the distinguishing characteristics, assumptions, and challenges of assessment systems; and the key lessons and factors associated with effective use of assessments. Additionally, the paper describes the innovative design and use of System-wide Assessments in the HCT; reports on the perceptions of the SWA process, value, and impact; and based on experiences in the HCT, recommendations are offered for increasing the probability of an effective assessment process and system in higher education. EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES The increased focus on educational outcomes has been influenced by a range of factors. According to Meyer and Bushney (2008), Outcome Assessment has arisen because of the perceived failures historically in properly evaluating higher education systems and programs. Lucas and Weber (1998) attributed the increased demand for Outcome Assessment to lowered expectations and standards. The decline in standards and quality has seen a corresponding increase in student grade point averages from grade inflation, as reported by Bond (2009), Johnson (2003), and Millet (2010). Increased use of Outcome Assessment has become necessary because of the lack of meaningful progress for student learning demonstrated on national exams (Kimmel & Marquette, 1998). The increased focus on accountability and assessment of outcomes likewise has arisen because of continued high attrition rates and differential educational outcomes based on socio-economic status and factors of race/ethnicity (Kimmel & Marquette, 1998). The call for greater assessment of outcomes in higher education is related to the perceived failure of institutional effectiveness and the deleterious implications for communities and societies because of the existence of under-prepared and uneducated populations, as described by Kuh and Ikenberry (2009), Nusche (2008), and the U.S. Department of Education (2006).\",\"PeriodicalId\":13684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Qual. Assur. Eng. Technol. Educ.\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Qual. Assur. Eng. Technol. Educ.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijqaete.2012070101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Qual. Assur. Eng. Technol. Educ.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijqaete.2012070101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文考察了全系统评估的使用情况,这是一项创新举措,旨在提高阿拉伯联合酋长国高等技术学院的问责制、质量和有效性。作者回顾了历史和当代对学院/大学评估的影响,以及影响结果评估发展和需求的关键力量或因素。本文总结了关于评估和促进变更的最佳实践的文献。本文描述了在17所联邦大学中随机使用系统范围评估的目标、结构和过程。一项对80位院长和主席的调查报告了对全系统评估过程和影响的看法和评级。报告描述了所吸取的经验教训,并就有效评估系统的关键组成部分提出建议,以促进问责制和改进高等教育。研究结果对整个中东和世界的高等教育机构的领导者具有重要意义。DOI: 10.4018 / ijqaete。2012070101 2国际工程技术教育质量保证学报,2(3),1- 20,2012年7 - 9月版权所有©2012,IGI Global。未经IGI Global书面许可,禁止以印刷或电子形式复制或分发。美国学院和大学(2002)建议,为了验证本科教育的价值,重组教育和审查课程成果的评估结果。根据美国教育部(2006年)的报告,美国高等教育委员会在2006年的报告中强调,地区认证机构应使用评估来促进投入和过程的绩效结果,使用质量评估数据来改善教学,并使用措施来确定学生的“附加价值”。Dinur和Sherman(2009)报告称,“成果评估(OA)已经成为学术机构向利益相关者展示其作为创造和传播知识的机构的可行性的系统机制”(第291页)。在高等技术学院(HCT)使用系统范围评估的背景下,总结了关键文献,以加深对高等教育成果评估发展和使用的历史和当代影响的理解;评估系统的显著特征、假设和挑战;以及与有效使用评估相关的关键教训和因素。此外,本文还介绍了HCT中全系统评估的创新设计和使用;报告对SWA过程、价值和影响的看法;并根据HCT的经验,提出建议,以提高高等教育有效评估过程和系统的可能性。对教育成果的日益重视受到一系列因素的影响。根据Meyer和Bushney(2008)的说法,结果评估之所以出现,是因为历史上在正确评估高等教育系统和项目方面的失败。Lucas和Weber(1998)将结果评估需求的增加归因于期望值和标准的降低。根据Bond(2009)、Johnson(2003)和Millet(2010)的报告,标准和质量的下降导致了学生平均成绩的相应提高。由于学生在国家考试中缺乏有意义的学习进展,因此增加使用结果评估已成为必要(Kimmel & Marquette, 1998)。同样,由于持续的高流失率和基于社会经济地位和种族/民族因素的不同教育结果,对问责制和结果评估的关注日益增加(Kimmel & Marquette, 1998)。正如Kuh和Ikenberry(2009)、Nusche(2008)和美国教育部(2006)所描述的那样,对高等教育结果进行更大程度评估的呼吁与机构有效性的感知失败以及由于存在准备不足和未受教育的人口而对社区和社会造成的有害影响有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Context, Design, and Impact of System-Wide Assessments to Enhance Effectiveness in the Higher Colleges of Technology of the United Arab Emirates
This paper examines the use of System-wide Assessments, an innovative initiative to enhance the accountability, quality, and effectiveness within the Higher Colleges of Technology of the United Arab Emirates. The authors review the historic and contemporary influences on college/university assessments and the key forces or factors which have shaped development and need of Outcome Assessments. The paper summarizes the literature on the best practices for assessment and promoting changes. The paper describes the objectives, structures, and processes involved with random use of System-wide Assessments among the 17 Federal colleges. A survey of 80 Deans and Chairs reports the perceptions and ratings of the process and impact of System-wide assessments. The lessons learned are described and inform recommendations for key components of an effective assessment system to promote accountability and improvement in higher education. Findings have significance for leaders of institutions of higher learning throughout the Middle East and the world. DOI: 10.4018/ijqaete.2012070101 2 International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education, 2(3), 1-20, July-September 2012 Copyright © 2012, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. American Colleges and Universities (2002) recommended, for verifying the value of undergraduate education, the reorganization of education and review of assessment results of course outcomes. According to the United States Department of Education (2006), the U.S. Commission on Higher Education’s report in 2006 emphasized for regional accreditation agencies to use assessment to promote performance outcomes over inputs and processes, to use quality assessment data to improve teaching and learning, and to use measures to determine “value added” for students. Dinur and Sherman (2009) reported that “Outcome Assessment (OA) has emerged as the systemic mechanism for academic institutions to demonstrate to their stakeholders their viability as institutions that create and disseminate knowledge” (p. 291). To contextualize the use of System-wide Assessments in the Higher Colleges of Technology (HCT), key literature is summarized to enhance understanding for the historic and contemporary influences on development and use of Outcome Assessments in higher education; the distinguishing characteristics, assumptions, and challenges of assessment systems; and the key lessons and factors associated with effective use of assessments. Additionally, the paper describes the innovative design and use of System-wide Assessments in the HCT; reports on the perceptions of the SWA process, value, and impact; and based on experiences in the HCT, recommendations are offered for increasing the probability of an effective assessment process and system in higher education. EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES The increased focus on educational outcomes has been influenced by a range of factors. According to Meyer and Bushney (2008), Outcome Assessment has arisen because of the perceived failures historically in properly evaluating higher education systems and programs. Lucas and Weber (1998) attributed the increased demand for Outcome Assessment to lowered expectations and standards. The decline in standards and quality has seen a corresponding increase in student grade point averages from grade inflation, as reported by Bond (2009), Johnson (2003), and Millet (2010). Increased use of Outcome Assessment has become necessary because of the lack of meaningful progress for student learning demonstrated on national exams (Kimmel & Marquette, 1998). The increased focus on accountability and assessment of outcomes likewise has arisen because of continued high attrition rates and differential educational outcomes based on socio-economic status and factors of race/ethnicity (Kimmel & Marquette, 1998). The call for greater assessment of outcomes in higher education is related to the perceived failure of institutional effectiveness and the deleterious implications for communities and societies because of the existence of under-prepared and uneducated populations, as described by Kuh and Ikenberry (2009), Nusche (2008), and the U.S. Department of Education (2006).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信