腹腔手术中静脉注射扑热息痛(15mg /kg)、利多卡因(2mg /kg)和硫酸镁(20mg /kg)与静脉注射曲马多(2mg /kg)标准阿片类麻醉先发制人镇痛的术后镇痛效果比较

Neena Jain, Neha Surendran, Meera Kumari, P. Kumar, Veena Patodi, Kavita Jain
{"title":"腹腔手术中静脉注射扑热息痛(15mg /kg)、利多卡因(2mg /kg)和硫酸镁(20mg /kg)与静脉注射曲马多(2mg /kg)标准阿片类麻醉先发制人镇痛的术后镇痛效果比较","authors":"Neena Jain, Neha Surendran, Meera Kumari, P. Kumar, Veena Patodi, Kavita Jain","doi":"10.4103/kleuhsj.kleuhsj_168_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience and is considered the fifth vital sign. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is a technique where no intraoperative systemic, neuraxial, or intracavitary opioids are administered during the anesthesia. The prescription misuse/overuse has generated an opioid crisis which has led to the need for OFA. In this study, we will investigate the 24-h postsurgical analgesia and analgesic consumption with the use of OFA versus opioid anesthesia (tramadol) in patients undergoing abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. METHODOLOGY: Sixty patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade I-II scheduled for various abdominal surgeries were randomly assigned into two groups, with 30 patients in each group. Group A (opioid-free group): received IV lignocaine (2 mg/kg), IV magnesium sulfate (20 mg/kg), and V paracetamol (15 mg/kg) in 100 ml NS. Group B (opioid group): received IV tramadol (2 mg/kg) in 100 ml NS. Hemodynamic parameters, postoperative analgesic consumption, duration of analgesia, and any adverse effects were recorded. RESULTS: A very significant difference was observed between the study groups for mean values of mean arterial pressure at the last stages of surgery, with hemodynamics more stable in the opioid-free group (P < 0.01). In terms of mean values of minimum alveolar concentration throughout the surgery, the opioid group showed more anesthetic-sparing effect (P < 0.05). In terms of postoperative pain scores between the groups, the opioid-free group experienced less pain (P < 0.01). There was no difference between the groups in postoperative analgesic consumption and duration of analgesia. More side effects were noted in the opioid group. CONCLUSION: This study concludes that avoiding opioid use by preemptive administration of intravenous paracetamol, lignocaine, and magnesium sulfate provides safe, effective, and satisfactory analgesia in patients undergoing various abdominal surgeries under general anesthesia.","PeriodicalId":13457,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research (KLEU)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of postoperative analgesic efficacy of opioid-free anesthesia using intravenous paracetamol (15 mg/kg), lignocaine (2 mg/kg), and magnesium sulfate (20 mg/kg) versus standard opioid anesthesia using intravenous tramadol (2 mg/kg) for preemptive analgesia in abdominal surgeries under gen\",\"authors\":\"Neena Jain, Neha Surendran, Meera Kumari, P. Kumar, Veena Patodi, Kavita Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/kleuhsj.kleuhsj_168_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience and is considered the fifth vital sign. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is a technique where no intraoperative systemic, neuraxial, or intracavitary opioids are administered during the anesthesia. The prescription misuse/overuse has generated an opioid crisis which has led to the need for OFA. In this study, we will investigate the 24-h postsurgical analgesia and analgesic consumption with the use of OFA versus opioid anesthesia (tramadol) in patients undergoing abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. METHODOLOGY: Sixty patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade I-II scheduled for various abdominal surgeries were randomly assigned into two groups, with 30 patients in each group. Group A (opioid-free group): received IV lignocaine (2 mg/kg), IV magnesium sulfate (20 mg/kg), and V paracetamol (15 mg/kg) in 100 ml NS. Group B (opioid group): received IV tramadol (2 mg/kg) in 100 ml NS. Hemodynamic parameters, postoperative analgesic consumption, duration of analgesia, and any adverse effects were recorded. RESULTS: A very significant difference was observed between the study groups for mean values of mean arterial pressure at the last stages of surgery, with hemodynamics more stable in the opioid-free group (P < 0.01). In terms of mean values of minimum alveolar concentration throughout the surgery, the opioid group showed more anesthetic-sparing effect (P < 0.05). In terms of postoperative pain scores between the groups, the opioid-free group experienced less pain (P < 0.01). There was no difference between the groups in postoperative analgesic consumption and duration of analgesia. More side effects were noted in the opioid group. CONCLUSION: This study concludes that avoiding opioid use by preemptive administration of intravenous paracetamol, lignocaine, and magnesium sulfate provides safe, effective, and satisfactory analgesia in patients undergoing various abdominal surgeries under general anesthesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research (KLEU)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research (KLEU)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/kleuhsj.kleuhsj_168_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research (KLEU)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/kleuhsj.kleuhsj_168_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疼痛是一种不愉快的感觉和情绪体验,被认为是第五大生命体征。无阿片类药物麻醉(OFA)是一种在麻醉过程中不使用全身、神经轴或腔内阿片类药物的技术。处方滥用/过度使用产生了阿片类药物危机,导致需要OFA。在这项研究中,我们将研究全麻下腹部手术患者术后24小时的镇痛和镇痛消耗,分别使用OFA和阿片类麻醉(曲马多)。方法:将60例美国麻醉师学会I-II级拟行各种腹部手术的患者随机分为两组,每组30例。A组(无阿片类药物组):静脉注射利多卡因(2 mg/kg),静脉注射硫酸镁(20 mg/kg),静脉注射扑热息痛(15 mg/kg), 100ml NS。B组(阿片类药物组):静脉滴注曲马多(2 mg/kg), 100ml NS。记录血流动力学参数、术后镇痛用量、镇痛持续时间及任何不良反应。结果:两组患者手术末期平均动脉压平均值比较,差异有统计学意义,无阿片类药物组血流动力学更稳定(P < 0.01)。在手术过程中肺泡最小浓度平均值方面,阿片类药物组表现出更强的保麻效果(P < 0.05)。两组术后疼痛评分差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。两组术后镇痛用量及镇痛持续时间无差异。阿片类药物组的副作用更多。结论:通过静脉注射扑热息痛、利多卡因和硫酸镁来避免阿片类药物的使用,可为全身麻醉下各种腹部手术患者提供安全、有效、满意的镇痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of postoperative analgesic efficacy of opioid-free anesthesia using intravenous paracetamol (15 mg/kg), lignocaine (2 mg/kg), and magnesium sulfate (20 mg/kg) versus standard opioid anesthesia using intravenous tramadol (2 mg/kg) for preemptive analgesia in abdominal surgeries under gen
INTRODUCTION: Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience and is considered the fifth vital sign. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is a technique where no intraoperative systemic, neuraxial, or intracavitary opioids are administered during the anesthesia. The prescription misuse/overuse has generated an opioid crisis which has led to the need for OFA. In this study, we will investigate the 24-h postsurgical analgesia and analgesic consumption with the use of OFA versus opioid anesthesia (tramadol) in patients undergoing abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. METHODOLOGY: Sixty patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade I-II scheduled for various abdominal surgeries were randomly assigned into two groups, with 30 patients in each group. Group A (opioid-free group): received IV lignocaine (2 mg/kg), IV magnesium sulfate (20 mg/kg), and V paracetamol (15 mg/kg) in 100 ml NS. Group B (opioid group): received IV tramadol (2 mg/kg) in 100 ml NS. Hemodynamic parameters, postoperative analgesic consumption, duration of analgesia, and any adverse effects were recorded. RESULTS: A very significant difference was observed between the study groups for mean values of mean arterial pressure at the last stages of surgery, with hemodynamics more stable in the opioid-free group (P < 0.01). In terms of mean values of minimum alveolar concentration throughout the surgery, the opioid group showed more anesthetic-sparing effect (P < 0.05). In terms of postoperative pain scores between the groups, the opioid-free group experienced less pain (P < 0.01). There was no difference between the groups in postoperative analgesic consumption and duration of analgesia. More side effects were noted in the opioid group. CONCLUSION: This study concludes that avoiding opioid use by preemptive administration of intravenous paracetamol, lignocaine, and magnesium sulfate provides safe, effective, and satisfactory analgesia in patients undergoing various abdominal surgeries under general anesthesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
32 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信