飞秒激光切割参数对小切口透镜提取效果的影响

Sam Enayati, Wen Zhou, A. Stojanovic, T. Utheim, Zhiwen Bian, Yue Feng, Xiangjun Chen
{"title":"飞秒激光切割参数对小切口透镜提取效果的影响","authors":"Sam Enayati, Wen Zhou, A. Stojanovic, T. Utheim, Zhiwen Bian, Yue Feng, Xiangjun Chen","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Femtosecond laser pulse energy setting can affect postoperative interface light scattering, visual and refractive outcomes, and cap thickness. Purpose: To determine the effect of femtosecond laser cutting parameters on small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) results by evaluating cap thickness, interface light scattering, and visual and refractive outcomes. Setting: SynsLaser Clinic, Oslo, Norway. Design: Retrospective. Methods: 58 right eyes treated with SMILE using a programmed cap thickness of 130 μm were divided into 2 groups according to laser settings: Group 1: 165 nJ pulse energy and 4.5 μm spot separation (n = 36); Group 2: 125 nJ pulse energy and 4.2 μm spot separation (n = 22). The cap thickness was measured within the central 5 mm of the horizontal meridian using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Postoperative interface light scattering was graded based on the percentage area showing light scattering: 0: no scattering; 1: ≤25%; 2: 26% to 50%; 3: 51% to 75%; and 4: >75%. Results: At 3 months postoperatively, cap thickness was 138.9 ± 6.2 μm in Group 1 and 149.4 ± 3.5 μm in Group 2 (P < .001). Interface scattering was 0.9 ± 1.0 in Group 1 and 0.3 ± 0.9 in Group 2 (P < .05), with no scattering in 33.3% and 86.4% of the eyes, respectively. The postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was −0.03 ± 0.44 diopters (D) in Group 1 and −0.04 ± 0.31 D in Group 2. In Group 1, 83.3% of the eyes were within ± 0.5 D of the desired outcome, and 69.4% achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better. In Group 2, these values were 95.5% and 86.4%, respectively. Conclusions: Lower pulse energy with tighter spots seems to reduce interface light scattering and improve refractive outcomes while also significantly increasing cap thickness.","PeriodicalId":15233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","volume":"78 1","pages":"1253 - 1259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of femtosecond laser cutting parameters on the results of small-incision lenticule extraction\",\"authors\":\"Sam Enayati, Wen Zhou, A. Stojanovic, T. Utheim, Zhiwen Bian, Yue Feng, Xiangjun Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Femtosecond laser pulse energy setting can affect postoperative interface light scattering, visual and refractive outcomes, and cap thickness. Purpose: To determine the effect of femtosecond laser cutting parameters on small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) results by evaluating cap thickness, interface light scattering, and visual and refractive outcomes. Setting: SynsLaser Clinic, Oslo, Norway. Design: Retrospective. Methods: 58 right eyes treated with SMILE using a programmed cap thickness of 130 μm were divided into 2 groups according to laser settings: Group 1: 165 nJ pulse energy and 4.5 μm spot separation (n = 36); Group 2: 125 nJ pulse energy and 4.2 μm spot separation (n = 22). The cap thickness was measured within the central 5 mm of the horizontal meridian using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Postoperative interface light scattering was graded based on the percentage area showing light scattering: 0: no scattering; 1: ≤25%; 2: 26% to 50%; 3: 51% to 75%; and 4: >75%. Results: At 3 months postoperatively, cap thickness was 138.9 ± 6.2 μm in Group 1 and 149.4 ± 3.5 μm in Group 2 (P < .001). Interface scattering was 0.9 ± 1.0 in Group 1 and 0.3 ± 0.9 in Group 2 (P < .05), with no scattering in 33.3% and 86.4% of the eyes, respectively. The postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was −0.03 ± 0.44 diopters (D) in Group 1 and −0.04 ± 0.31 D in Group 2. In Group 1, 83.3% of the eyes were within ± 0.5 D of the desired outcome, and 69.4% achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better. In Group 2, these values were 95.5% and 86.4%, respectively. Conclusions: Lower pulse energy with tighter spots seems to reduce interface light scattering and improve refractive outcomes while also significantly increasing cap thickness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"1253 - 1259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000965\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

飞秒激光脉冲能量设置会影响术后界面光散射、视觉和折射结果以及帽厚。目的:评价飞秒激光切割参数对小切口晶状体提取(SMILE)效果的影响,包括帽厚、界面光散射、视觉和屈光效果。地点:挪威奥斯陆SynsLaser诊所。设计:回顾性。方法:采用程控帽厚度为130 μm的SMILE治疗右眼58只,根据激光设置分为两组:第一组:脉冲能量165 nJ,光斑间距4.5 μm (n = 36);第二组:脉冲能量125 nJ,光斑间距4.2 μm (n = 22)。利用光谱域光学相干层析成像技术在水平子午线中心5mm范围内测量帽厚。根据显示光散射面积的百分比对术后界面光散射进行分级:0:无散射;1:≤25%;2: 26% ~ 50%;3: 51% ~ 75%;4: >75%。结果:术后3个月,第1组帽厚138.9±6.2 μm,第2组帽厚149.4±3.5 μm (P < 0.001)。1组和2组的界面散射值分别为0.9±1.0和0.3±0.9 (P < 0.05),分别为33.3%和86.4%的眼无散射。术后球面等效屈光度1组为- 0.03±0.44屈光度(D), 2组为- 0.04±0.31 D。在第1组中,83.3%的眼睛在预期结果的±0.5 D范围内,69.4%的眼睛达到20/20或更好的未矫正距离视力。第2组分别为95.5%和86.4%。结论:较低的脉冲能量和较紧的光斑似乎减少了界面光散射,改善了折射结果,同时也显著增加了光帽厚度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of femtosecond laser cutting parameters on the results of small-incision lenticule extraction
Femtosecond laser pulse energy setting can affect postoperative interface light scattering, visual and refractive outcomes, and cap thickness. Purpose: To determine the effect of femtosecond laser cutting parameters on small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) results by evaluating cap thickness, interface light scattering, and visual and refractive outcomes. Setting: SynsLaser Clinic, Oslo, Norway. Design: Retrospective. Methods: 58 right eyes treated with SMILE using a programmed cap thickness of 130 μm were divided into 2 groups according to laser settings: Group 1: 165 nJ pulse energy and 4.5 μm spot separation (n = 36); Group 2: 125 nJ pulse energy and 4.2 μm spot separation (n = 22). The cap thickness was measured within the central 5 mm of the horizontal meridian using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Postoperative interface light scattering was graded based on the percentage area showing light scattering: 0: no scattering; 1: ≤25%; 2: 26% to 50%; 3: 51% to 75%; and 4: >75%. Results: At 3 months postoperatively, cap thickness was 138.9 ± 6.2 μm in Group 1 and 149.4 ± 3.5 μm in Group 2 (P < .001). Interface scattering was 0.9 ± 1.0 in Group 1 and 0.3 ± 0.9 in Group 2 (P < .05), with no scattering in 33.3% and 86.4% of the eyes, respectively. The postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was −0.03 ± 0.44 diopters (D) in Group 1 and −0.04 ± 0.31 D in Group 2. In Group 1, 83.3% of the eyes were within ± 0.5 D of the desired outcome, and 69.4% achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better. In Group 2, these values were 95.5% and 86.4%, respectively. Conclusions: Lower pulse energy with tighter spots seems to reduce interface light scattering and improve refractive outcomes while also significantly increasing cap thickness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信