基于认知风格(场依赖型和场独立型)的准物理教师学习成绩比较分析

A. Busyairi, A. Harjono, Himawati Hikmawati, M. Zuhdi
{"title":"基于认知风格(场依赖型和场独立型)的准物理教师学习成绩比较分析","authors":"A. Busyairi, A. Harjono, Himawati Hikmawati, M. Zuhdi","doi":"10.29303/jpft.v8i1.3505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the comparison of student achievement with field-dependent (FD) and field-independent (FI) cognitive styles. The method used in this research is a comparative descriptive method with a quantitative approach. The sample consisted of 30 prospective physics teacher students who were studying at the University of Mataram. Research data were taken using the Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT) and documentation of the study result card (SRC). GEFT is used to determine cognitive style while documentation is used to determine the cumulative achievement index (CAI) of students. Based on the results of the t-test at the 95% confidence level (α = 0.05) with the degree of independence (dk =   2= 28), it shows that there are significant differences in learning achievement between FI and FD students. The average learning achievement of FI students (CAI = 3.15) tends to be better than that of FD students (CAI = 3.37).","PeriodicalId":34735,"journal":{"name":"JPFT Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Prospective Physics Teachers’ Learning Achievement in Terms of Cognitive Style (Field Dependent and Field Independent)\",\"authors\":\"A. Busyairi, A. Harjono, Himawati Hikmawati, M. Zuhdi\",\"doi\":\"10.29303/jpft.v8i1.3505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to determine the comparison of student achievement with field-dependent (FD) and field-independent (FI) cognitive styles. The method used in this research is a comparative descriptive method with a quantitative approach. The sample consisted of 30 prospective physics teacher students who were studying at the University of Mataram. Research data were taken using the Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT) and documentation of the study result card (SRC). GEFT is used to determine cognitive style while documentation is used to determine the cumulative achievement index (CAI) of students. Based on the results of the t-test at the 95% confidence level (α = 0.05) with the degree of independence (dk =   2= 28), it shows that there are significant differences in learning achievement between FI and FD students. The average learning achievement of FI students (CAI = 3.15) tends to be better than that of FD students (CAI = 3.37).\",\"PeriodicalId\":34735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JPFT Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JPFT Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v8i1.3505\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPFT Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v8i1.3505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较场依赖型(FD)和场独立型(FI)认知风格对学生成绩的影响。在本研究中使用的方法是比较描述性的方法与定量的方法。样本由30名在马塔兰大学学习的未来物理教师学生组成。研究数据采用小组嵌入图测试(GEFT)和研究结果卡(SRC)的记录。采用GEFT确定学生的认知风格,采用文献法确定学生的累积成就指数(CAI)。在95%置信水平(α = 0.05)和独立程度(dk = 2= 28)下的t检验结果显示,FI学生和FD学生在学习成就上存在显著差异。FI学生的平均学习成绩(CAI = 3.15)倾向于优于FD学生(CAI = 3.37)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Prospective Physics Teachers’ Learning Achievement in Terms of Cognitive Style (Field Dependent and Field Independent)
This study aims to determine the comparison of student achievement with field-dependent (FD) and field-independent (FI) cognitive styles. The method used in this research is a comparative descriptive method with a quantitative approach. The sample consisted of 30 prospective physics teacher students who were studying at the University of Mataram. Research data were taken using the Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT) and documentation of the study result card (SRC). GEFT is used to determine cognitive style while documentation is used to determine the cumulative achievement index (CAI) of students. Based on the results of the t-test at the 95% confidence level (α = 0.05) with the degree of independence (dk =   2= 28), it shows that there are significant differences in learning achievement between FI and FD students. The average learning achievement of FI students (CAI = 3.15) tends to be better than that of FD students (CAI = 3.37).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信