Hyunmin Kim, Seokhie Hong, B. Preneel, I. Verbauwhede
{"title":"二元决策图设计平衡的安全逻辑样式","authors":"Hyunmin Kim, Seokhie Hong, B. Preneel, I. Verbauwhede","doi":"10.1109/IOLTS.2016.7604710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Embedded implementations of cryptographic algorithms require countermeasures against side-channel attacks (SCAs), that exploit physical variables measured during the computation. These countermeasures increase cost, power consumption and latency of the device. One class of countermeasures, hiding, consists of a balanced circuit style, including balancing of the capacitances and delays; it requires full connection to avoid memory effect that is an effect caused by repeatedly recharged energy after being only partially discharged at the internal parasitic capacitance. This paper proposes binary decision diagrams (BDDs) to derive complex pull-down networks that fulfill all these requirements while being compact at the same time; it uses sense amplifier-based logic (SABL) to obtain well-balanced pre-charge circuits. An attack based on mutual information analysis (MIA) is applied to the AES S-boxes implemented in our novel secure logic style. After the evaluation at pre-layout SPICE level, the balanced circuit with BDD leaks less information than comparable logic styles, even though the implementation area is reduced by 40.6%, the power consumption up to 46.1% and the delay by 35.2% compared to the classic SABL approach.","PeriodicalId":6580,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on On-Line Testing and Robust System Design (IOLTS)","volume":"104 1","pages":"239-244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Binary decision diagram to design balanced secure logic styles\",\"authors\":\"Hyunmin Kim, Seokhie Hong, B. Preneel, I. Verbauwhede\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IOLTS.2016.7604710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Embedded implementations of cryptographic algorithms require countermeasures against side-channel attacks (SCAs), that exploit physical variables measured during the computation. These countermeasures increase cost, power consumption and latency of the device. One class of countermeasures, hiding, consists of a balanced circuit style, including balancing of the capacitances and delays; it requires full connection to avoid memory effect that is an effect caused by repeatedly recharged energy after being only partially discharged at the internal parasitic capacitance. This paper proposes binary decision diagrams (BDDs) to derive complex pull-down networks that fulfill all these requirements while being compact at the same time; it uses sense amplifier-based logic (SABL) to obtain well-balanced pre-charge circuits. An attack based on mutual information analysis (MIA) is applied to the AES S-boxes implemented in our novel secure logic style. After the evaluation at pre-layout SPICE level, the balanced circuit with BDD leaks less information than comparable logic styles, even though the implementation area is reduced by 40.6%, the power consumption up to 46.1% and the delay by 35.2% compared to the classic SABL approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on On-Line Testing and Robust System Design (IOLTS)\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"239-244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on On-Line Testing and Robust System Design (IOLTS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IOLTS.2016.7604710\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on On-Line Testing and Robust System Design (IOLTS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IOLTS.2016.7604710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
加密算法的嵌入式实现需要针对侧信道攻击(sca)的对策,这种攻击利用在计算过程中测量的物理变量。这些对策增加了设备的成本、功耗和延迟。一类对抗措施,隐藏,由平衡电路风格组成,包括平衡电容和延迟;它需要完全连接,以避免记忆效应,即能量在内部寄生电容处仅部分放电后反复充电造成的效应。本文提出了二元决策图(bdd)来推导复杂的下拉网络,该网络在满足所有这些要求的同时又具有紧凑性;它使用基于感测放大器的逻辑(SABL)来获得平衡良好的预充电电路。本文提出了一种基于互信息分析(MIA)的AES s -box攻击方法。经过布局前SPICE水平的评估,与同类逻辑风格相比,BDD平衡电路泄漏的信息更少,尽管与经典SABL方法相比,实现面积减少了40.6%,功耗减少了46.1%,延迟减少了35.2%。
Binary decision diagram to design balanced secure logic styles
Embedded implementations of cryptographic algorithms require countermeasures against side-channel attacks (SCAs), that exploit physical variables measured during the computation. These countermeasures increase cost, power consumption and latency of the device. One class of countermeasures, hiding, consists of a balanced circuit style, including balancing of the capacitances and delays; it requires full connection to avoid memory effect that is an effect caused by repeatedly recharged energy after being only partially discharged at the internal parasitic capacitance. This paper proposes binary decision diagrams (BDDs) to derive complex pull-down networks that fulfill all these requirements while being compact at the same time; it uses sense amplifier-based logic (SABL) to obtain well-balanced pre-charge circuits. An attack based on mutual information analysis (MIA) is applied to the AES S-boxes implemented in our novel secure logic style. After the evaluation at pre-layout SPICE level, the balanced circuit with BDD leaks less information than comparable logic styles, even though the implementation area is reduced by 40.6%, the power consumption up to 46.1% and the delay by 35.2% compared to the classic SABL approach.