“我们在路上了。”来自大山的信息

IF 0.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
A. Hannawa
{"title":"“我们在路上了。”来自大山的信息","authors":"A. Hannawa","doi":"10.1177/25160435211058145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do we improve the quality and safety of care? In healthcare, we commonly look at outcome measures when pondering this question. But safety-critical processes are not visible in these measures. And if they remain undetected, they can be a dormant source of sudden harm. This past year, I have immersed myself into the study of mountain rescues as part of a funded scientific investigation. At patient safety meetings, I have long encountered comparisons to the airline industry. “What can healthcare learn from aviation safety?” Patient safety research has begun to compare healthcare teams with flight crews. It has implemented aviation-based “Crew Resource Management (CRM)” models into the healthcare setting. But on what foundation? From a scientific standpoint, building this bridge into practice based on purely theoretical arguments seems insufficient. Instead of accepting the validity of this comparison at face value, I decided to take a closer look at safety-relevant processes in a context where both industries work together to save patients’ lives. Where this comparison is not merely a rhetorical exercise, but observable in practice. This is how I came to participate in airborne mountain rescues. I have spent all of the past year flying along with rescue teams and analyzing hundreds of rescues at the regional emergency call center (144). I interviewed all participating actors in this highly interprofessional setting, where pilots, physicians, paramedics, mountain guides, and 144-staff must work together smoothly under high-stakes conditions to prevent harm while saving patients’ lives. One of the rescues I attended was on a warm Friday afternoon in the Fall of 2020. We had just brought an injured skier with a shoulder dislocation from a ski slope at 4,000 m elevation to the regional hospital, when we were called about a patient with cardiac arrest in a nearby mountain village. The primary difficulty of airborne rescues is always to find a place to land the helicopter. Sometimes, if there is no possibility to exit by foot, the physician or mountain guide have to rappel from the airborne helicopter on a 200 meter free-hanging rope to be with the patient. In the case of this particular rescue, there was a meadow where we could land. The son and wife of the patient waived at us frantically, signaling us to follow them. Still in glacier suits and loaded with the heavy resuscitation equipment, we followed them into their house. The physician immediately asked pointed questions to find out what happened. The son’s voice shifted between hope, despair and distress as he proclaimed repeatedly: “He’s dead, I think he’s already dead.” Through repeated questioning, the story emerged: The patient, a man of about age 60, had been chopping wood behind the house when he felt a sudden, severe pain in his chest and collapsed. The son and his wife had brought him back into the house and laid him on the couch in the living room, where the patient shortly after proclaimed: “I’m going now.” The patient went into cardiac arrest about 5 minutes before we arrived. There he was, lying in front of us. He looked peaceful. His mouth was slightly open, his eyes were closed as if he were sleeping. The way he was lying on the couch looked stiff and uncomfortable. His cheekbones were very visible, and his skin was grayish pale. I felt powerless. The physician and the paramedic however immediately went into emergency mode. The paramedic, much younger than the more experienced physician, seemed to be in a constructive panic. He knew they had to act fast. At the same time, he had to attend to the needs of the physician: “Scissors!” Within less than a minute, the furniture had been moved and the patient was lifted down onto the wooden floor and stripped – a naked body with no visible signs of life. The body arched from the electric shock and fell heavily back onto the floor. Chest compressions, mouth-to-mouth breathing, and several needle injections were attempted to infuse life back into the patient’s body. In the background, the unattended wife and son alternated between panic, nausea, and flight-fight-freeze responses. After 10 min, the patient still looked the same to me, but the physician and paramedic had observed some response to their physical labor. The paramedic seemed more enthused than the physician, who whispered: “I don’t Commentary","PeriodicalId":73888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","volume":"7 1","pages":"240 - 242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“We’re on our way:” A message from the mountains\",\"authors\":\"A. Hannawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/25160435211058145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How do we improve the quality and safety of care? In healthcare, we commonly look at outcome measures when pondering this question. But safety-critical processes are not visible in these measures. And if they remain undetected, they can be a dormant source of sudden harm. This past year, I have immersed myself into the study of mountain rescues as part of a funded scientific investigation. At patient safety meetings, I have long encountered comparisons to the airline industry. “What can healthcare learn from aviation safety?” Patient safety research has begun to compare healthcare teams with flight crews. It has implemented aviation-based “Crew Resource Management (CRM)” models into the healthcare setting. But on what foundation? From a scientific standpoint, building this bridge into practice based on purely theoretical arguments seems insufficient. Instead of accepting the validity of this comparison at face value, I decided to take a closer look at safety-relevant processes in a context where both industries work together to save patients’ lives. Where this comparison is not merely a rhetorical exercise, but observable in practice. This is how I came to participate in airborne mountain rescues. I have spent all of the past year flying along with rescue teams and analyzing hundreds of rescues at the regional emergency call center (144). I interviewed all participating actors in this highly interprofessional setting, where pilots, physicians, paramedics, mountain guides, and 144-staff must work together smoothly under high-stakes conditions to prevent harm while saving patients’ lives. One of the rescues I attended was on a warm Friday afternoon in the Fall of 2020. We had just brought an injured skier with a shoulder dislocation from a ski slope at 4,000 m elevation to the regional hospital, when we were called about a patient with cardiac arrest in a nearby mountain village. The primary difficulty of airborne rescues is always to find a place to land the helicopter. Sometimes, if there is no possibility to exit by foot, the physician or mountain guide have to rappel from the airborne helicopter on a 200 meter free-hanging rope to be with the patient. In the case of this particular rescue, there was a meadow where we could land. The son and wife of the patient waived at us frantically, signaling us to follow them. Still in glacier suits and loaded with the heavy resuscitation equipment, we followed them into their house. The physician immediately asked pointed questions to find out what happened. The son’s voice shifted between hope, despair and distress as he proclaimed repeatedly: “He’s dead, I think he’s already dead.” Through repeated questioning, the story emerged: The patient, a man of about age 60, had been chopping wood behind the house when he felt a sudden, severe pain in his chest and collapsed. The son and his wife had brought him back into the house and laid him on the couch in the living room, where the patient shortly after proclaimed: “I’m going now.” The patient went into cardiac arrest about 5 minutes before we arrived. There he was, lying in front of us. He looked peaceful. His mouth was slightly open, his eyes were closed as if he were sleeping. The way he was lying on the couch looked stiff and uncomfortable. His cheekbones were very visible, and his skin was grayish pale. I felt powerless. The physician and the paramedic however immediately went into emergency mode. The paramedic, much younger than the more experienced physician, seemed to be in a constructive panic. He knew they had to act fast. At the same time, he had to attend to the needs of the physician: “Scissors!” Within less than a minute, the furniture had been moved and the patient was lifted down onto the wooden floor and stripped – a naked body with no visible signs of life. The body arched from the electric shock and fell heavily back onto the floor. Chest compressions, mouth-to-mouth breathing, and several needle injections were attempted to infuse life back into the patient’s body. In the background, the unattended wife and son alternated between panic, nausea, and flight-fight-freeze responses. After 10 min, the patient still looked the same to me, but the physician and paramedic had observed some response to their physical labor. The paramedic seemed more enthused than the physician, who whispered: “I don’t Commentary\",\"PeriodicalId\":73888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of patient safety and risk management\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"240 - 242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of patient safety and risk management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435211058145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435211058145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们如何提高护理的质量和安全性?在医疗保健领域,我们在思考这个问题时通常会考虑结果指标。但在这些措施中看不到安全关键过程。如果它们不被发现,它们可能会成为突然伤害的潜在来源。在过去的一年里,作为一项资助的科学调查的一部分,我全身心地投入到山区救援的研究中。在病人安全会议上,我经常被拿来与航空业作比较。医疗保健可以从航空安全中学到什么?患者安全研究已经开始将医疗团队与机组人员进行比较。它在医疗保健环境中实施了基于航空的“机组资源管理(CRM)”模型。但依据是什么呢?从科学的角度来看,将这一桥梁建立在纯理论论证的基础上似乎是不够的。我没有从表面上接受这种比较的有效性,而是决定在两个行业共同努力拯救患者生命的背景下,仔细研究与安全相关的流程。这种比较不仅仅是一种修辞练习,而是在实践中可以观察到的。这就是我参加山地空中救援的原因。在过去的一年里,我一直与救援队一起飞行,并在地区紧急呼叫中心分析了数百起救援事件。在这个高度专业的环境中,我采访了所有参与者,飞行员、医生、护理人员、山地向导和144名工作人员必须在高风险的条件下顺利合作,以防止伤害,同时挽救患者的生命。我参加的其中一次救援是在2020年秋天一个温暖的周五下午。我们刚把一位肩膀脱臼的滑雪运动员从海拔4000米的滑雪场送到地区医院,就接到电话说附近一个山村有一位心脏骤停的病人。空中救援的主要困难总是找到一个降落直升机的地方。有时,如果不可能步行离开,医生或登山向导必须从空中直升机上用200米的自由悬挂绳索下降到病人身边。在这次特殊的救援中,有一片草地可以让我们降落。病人的儿子和妻子疯狂地向我们挥手,示意我们跟着他们。我们仍然穿着冰川服,背着沉重的复苏设备,跟着他们进了他们的房子。医生立即问了一些尖锐的问题,想弄清楚发生了什么。儿子的声音时而充满希望,时而绝望,时而悲痛,他反复宣称:“他死了,我想他已经死了。”经过反复询问,故事才浮出水面:病人是一名60岁左右的男子,当时他正在屋后砍柴,突然感到胸部剧烈疼痛,然后瘫倒在地。儿子和他的妻子把他带回了家,把他放在客厅的沙发上。不久,病人宣布:“我要走了。”病人在我们到达前五分钟心脏骤停。他就在那儿,躺在我们面前。他看上去很平静。他的嘴微微张着,眼睛闭着,好像在睡觉。他躺在沙发上的姿势显得僵硬而不舒服。他的颧骨清晰可见,皮肤呈灰白色。我感到无能为力。然而,医生和护理人员立即进入了紧急状态。这位护理人员比那位经验丰富的医生年轻得多,他似乎处于一种建设性的恐慌之中。他知道他们必须迅速行动。同时,他还得照顾医生的需要:“剪刀!”不到一分钟,家具就被搬走了,病人被抬到木地板上,被扒光了衣服——一具没有明显生命迹象的裸体。身体因电击而拱起,重重地倒在地板上。胸外按压、口对口呼吸和几针注射都试图将生命注入病人体内。在背景中,无人看管的妻子和儿子在恐慌、恶心和逃跑-战斗-冻结反应之间交替。10分钟后,在我看来病人还是老样子,但医生和护理人员观察到他们的体力劳动有了一些反应。护理人员似乎比医生更热心,医生低声说:“我不评论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“We’re on our way:” A message from the mountains
How do we improve the quality and safety of care? In healthcare, we commonly look at outcome measures when pondering this question. But safety-critical processes are not visible in these measures. And if they remain undetected, they can be a dormant source of sudden harm. This past year, I have immersed myself into the study of mountain rescues as part of a funded scientific investigation. At patient safety meetings, I have long encountered comparisons to the airline industry. “What can healthcare learn from aviation safety?” Patient safety research has begun to compare healthcare teams with flight crews. It has implemented aviation-based “Crew Resource Management (CRM)” models into the healthcare setting. But on what foundation? From a scientific standpoint, building this bridge into practice based on purely theoretical arguments seems insufficient. Instead of accepting the validity of this comparison at face value, I decided to take a closer look at safety-relevant processes in a context where both industries work together to save patients’ lives. Where this comparison is not merely a rhetorical exercise, but observable in practice. This is how I came to participate in airborne mountain rescues. I have spent all of the past year flying along with rescue teams and analyzing hundreds of rescues at the regional emergency call center (144). I interviewed all participating actors in this highly interprofessional setting, where pilots, physicians, paramedics, mountain guides, and 144-staff must work together smoothly under high-stakes conditions to prevent harm while saving patients’ lives. One of the rescues I attended was on a warm Friday afternoon in the Fall of 2020. We had just brought an injured skier with a shoulder dislocation from a ski slope at 4,000 m elevation to the regional hospital, when we were called about a patient with cardiac arrest in a nearby mountain village. The primary difficulty of airborne rescues is always to find a place to land the helicopter. Sometimes, if there is no possibility to exit by foot, the physician or mountain guide have to rappel from the airborne helicopter on a 200 meter free-hanging rope to be with the patient. In the case of this particular rescue, there was a meadow where we could land. The son and wife of the patient waived at us frantically, signaling us to follow them. Still in glacier suits and loaded with the heavy resuscitation equipment, we followed them into their house. The physician immediately asked pointed questions to find out what happened. The son’s voice shifted between hope, despair and distress as he proclaimed repeatedly: “He’s dead, I think he’s already dead.” Through repeated questioning, the story emerged: The patient, a man of about age 60, had been chopping wood behind the house when he felt a sudden, severe pain in his chest and collapsed. The son and his wife had brought him back into the house and laid him on the couch in the living room, where the patient shortly after proclaimed: “I’m going now.” The patient went into cardiac arrest about 5 minutes before we arrived. There he was, lying in front of us. He looked peaceful. His mouth was slightly open, his eyes were closed as if he were sleeping. The way he was lying on the couch looked stiff and uncomfortable. His cheekbones were very visible, and his skin was grayish pale. I felt powerless. The physician and the paramedic however immediately went into emergency mode. The paramedic, much younger than the more experienced physician, seemed to be in a constructive panic. He knew they had to act fast. At the same time, he had to attend to the needs of the physician: “Scissors!” Within less than a minute, the furniture had been moved and the patient was lifted down onto the wooden floor and stripped – a naked body with no visible signs of life. The body arched from the electric shock and fell heavily back onto the floor. Chest compressions, mouth-to-mouth breathing, and several needle injections were attempted to infuse life back into the patient’s body. In the background, the unattended wife and son alternated between panic, nausea, and flight-fight-freeze responses. After 10 min, the patient still looked the same to me, but the physician and paramedic had observed some response to their physical labor. The paramedic seemed more enthused than the physician, who whispered: “I don’t Commentary
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信