英国呼吸疾病研究对其他欧洲成员国临床实践指南的价值

E. Pallari
{"title":"英国呼吸疾病研究对其他欧洲成员国临床实践指南的价值","authors":"E. Pallari","doi":"10.4172/2161-105X.1000434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/objectives: Research on chronic non-communicable respiratory conditions is limited. This study assessed the impact of UK medical research on other European countries development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), to evaluate the UK contribution to the evidence-base of European CPGs on chronic non-communicable respiratory conditions. Method: The UK contribution was determined on a fractional count basis to clinical guidelines’ citations: (1) from each of five selected (target) Member States (MS), namely France, Germany, The Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland; and (2) from the other 25 countries (the other 23 EU MS, plus Iceland and Norway). Results: There were 6,087 cited references on 52 clinical practice guidelines published from 21 European countries. The UK contribution varied between 11% and 17% for the five target EU MSs countries for all respiratory conditions clinical guidelines. There was more foreign collaboration research on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (33%) than asthma (25%) with results being statistically significant. Conclusions: The study showed the importance of UK medical research contribution to the evidence-base of respiratory clinical guidelines in other European MS. Notable differences between asthma and COPD, can inform research priorities and medical progression on respiratory conditions’ clinical management.","PeriodicalId":90449,"journal":{"name":"Austin journal of pulmonary and respiratory medicine","volume":"96 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Value of UK Respiratory Conditions Research on Clinical Practice Guidelines from Other European Member States\",\"authors\":\"E. Pallari\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2161-105X.1000434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background/objectives: Research on chronic non-communicable respiratory conditions is limited. This study assessed the impact of UK medical research on other European countries development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), to evaluate the UK contribution to the evidence-base of European CPGs on chronic non-communicable respiratory conditions. Method: The UK contribution was determined on a fractional count basis to clinical guidelines’ citations: (1) from each of five selected (target) Member States (MS), namely France, Germany, The Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland; and (2) from the other 25 countries (the other 23 EU MS, plus Iceland and Norway). Results: There were 6,087 cited references on 52 clinical practice guidelines published from 21 European countries. The UK contribution varied between 11% and 17% for the five target EU MSs countries for all respiratory conditions clinical guidelines. There was more foreign collaboration research on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (33%) than asthma (25%) with results being statistically significant. Conclusions: The study showed the importance of UK medical research contribution to the evidence-base of respiratory clinical guidelines in other European MS. Notable differences between asthma and COPD, can inform research priorities and medical progression on respiratory conditions’ clinical management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austin journal of pulmonary and respiratory medicine\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austin journal of pulmonary and respiratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-105X.1000434\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin journal of pulmonary and respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-105X.1000434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景/目的:对慢性非传染性呼吸疾病的研究是有限的。本研究评估了英国医学研究对其他欧洲国家临床实践指南(CPGs)制定的影响,以评估英国对欧洲慢性非传染性呼吸疾病CPGs证据基础的贡献。方法:英国的贡献是在临床指南引用的分数计数基础上确定的:(1)来自五个选定的(目标)成员国(MS),即法国、德国、荷兰、瑞典和瑞士;(2)来自其他25个国家(另外23个欧盟MS,加上冰岛和挪威)。结果:欧洲21个国家发表的52份临床实践指南共6087篇被引文献。在所有呼吸系统疾病临床指南中,英国对五个目标欧盟MSs国家的贡献在11%到17%之间。慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的国外合作研究(33%)多于哮喘(25%),结果具有统计学意义。结论:该研究显示了英国医学研究对其他欧洲ms呼吸系统临床指南证据基础的重要性。哮喘和COPD之间的显著差异,可以为呼吸系统疾病临床管理的研究重点和医学进展提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Value of UK Respiratory Conditions Research on Clinical Practice Guidelines from Other European Member States
Background/objectives: Research on chronic non-communicable respiratory conditions is limited. This study assessed the impact of UK medical research on other European countries development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), to evaluate the UK contribution to the evidence-base of European CPGs on chronic non-communicable respiratory conditions. Method: The UK contribution was determined on a fractional count basis to clinical guidelines’ citations: (1) from each of five selected (target) Member States (MS), namely France, Germany, The Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland; and (2) from the other 25 countries (the other 23 EU MS, plus Iceland and Norway). Results: There were 6,087 cited references on 52 clinical practice guidelines published from 21 European countries. The UK contribution varied between 11% and 17% for the five target EU MSs countries for all respiratory conditions clinical guidelines. There was more foreign collaboration research on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (33%) than asthma (25%) with results being statistically significant. Conclusions: The study showed the importance of UK medical research contribution to the evidence-base of respiratory clinical guidelines in other European MS. Notable differences between asthma and COPD, can inform research priorities and medical progression on respiratory conditions’ clinical management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信