用扫描电镜等高线表征层间边缘布置

IF 1.5 2区 物理与天体物理 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
F. Weisbuch, Jirka Schatz, M. Ruhm
{"title":"用扫描电镜等高线表征层间边缘布置","authors":"F. Weisbuch, Jirka Schatz, M. Ruhm","doi":"10.1117/1.JMM.18.2.021203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Background: The continuous scaling of integrated circuit requires not only a very good control of the device critical dimensions but also a very accurate control of the device overlay between layers to achieve satisfactory yields. These two critical factors can be combined to a single metric called interlayer edge placement error (EPEinterlayer) that quantifies the process margin necessary to keep a safe separation, extension, or overlap between the edges of a pattern in one layer with respect to another pattern in a second layer. Aim: The purpose of this work is to characterize with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the EPEinterlayer and overlay variances of complex contact shapes relative to a poly layer to assess the contributions of the systematic and random EPEinterlayer. Approach: SEM images of a few etched patterns were recorded sequentially for both contact and poly features at the same locations on the wafer. Then, SEM contours were extracted, aligned, and overlapped to derive EPEinterlayer. One experiment was focusing on intrawafer EPEinterlayer characterization whereas another was studying more specifically intrafield overlay variations. For the latter experiment, systematic overlay errors were added to facilitate the comparison of the SEM-based method with respect to a reference image-based overlay (IBO) method. Results: The earliest direct metrology of EPEinterlayer and overlay in device enabled by this work shows a very high variability of EPEinterlayer and overlay errors across wafer and across field. Conclusions: By directly measuring the EPEinterlayer on devices that are not accessible by the standard method (optical IBO on OL structures), we showed the feasibility of this metrology and observed more dimensional variance in devices than recognized with IBO, thereby enabling better control of device pattern variation.","PeriodicalId":16522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS","volume":"17 1","pages":"021203 - 021203"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing interlayer edge placement with SEM contours\",\"authors\":\"F. Weisbuch, Jirka Schatz, M. Ruhm\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/1.JMM.18.2.021203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Background: The continuous scaling of integrated circuit requires not only a very good control of the device critical dimensions but also a very accurate control of the device overlay between layers to achieve satisfactory yields. These two critical factors can be combined to a single metric called interlayer edge placement error (EPEinterlayer) that quantifies the process margin necessary to keep a safe separation, extension, or overlap between the edges of a pattern in one layer with respect to another pattern in a second layer. Aim: The purpose of this work is to characterize with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the EPEinterlayer and overlay variances of complex contact shapes relative to a poly layer to assess the contributions of the systematic and random EPEinterlayer. Approach: SEM images of a few etched patterns were recorded sequentially for both contact and poly features at the same locations on the wafer. Then, SEM contours were extracted, aligned, and overlapped to derive EPEinterlayer. One experiment was focusing on intrawafer EPEinterlayer characterization whereas another was studying more specifically intrafield overlay variations. For the latter experiment, systematic overlay errors were added to facilitate the comparison of the SEM-based method with respect to a reference image-based overlay (IBO) method. Results: The earliest direct metrology of EPEinterlayer and overlay in device enabled by this work shows a very high variability of EPEinterlayer and overlay errors across wafer and across field. Conclusions: By directly measuring the EPEinterlayer on devices that are not accessible by the standard method (optical IBO on OL structures), we showed the feasibility of this metrology and observed more dimensional variance in devices than recognized with IBO, thereby enabling better control of device pattern variation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"021203 - 021203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMM.18.2.021203\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMM.18.2.021203","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要背景:集成电路的连续缩放不仅需要很好地控制器件的关键尺寸,而且需要非常精确地控制层与层之间的器件覆盖,以达到令人满意的成品率。这两个关键因素可以组合成一个单一的度量,称为层间边缘放置误差(EPEinterlayer),它量化了保持一层中图案的边缘之间相对于第二层中的另一个图案的安全分离、延伸或重叠所需的过程余量。目的:本研究的目的是利用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)表征复杂接触形状的EPEinterlayer和覆盖层的变化,以评估系统和随机EPEinterlayer的贡献。方法:在晶圆片上的同一位置依次记录少量蚀刻图案的接触和聚特征的扫描电镜图像。然后,对扫描电镜轮廓进行提取、对齐、重叠,得到EPEinterlayer;一个实验专注于晶圆内epe层间表征,而另一个实验更具体地研究了场内覆盖变化。在后一种实验中,为了便于将基于sem的方法与基于参考图像的覆盖(IBO)方法进行比较,我们添加了系统的覆盖误差。结果:通过这项工作实现的最早的EPEinterlayer和overlay在设备中的直接计量显示,EPEinterlayer和overlay误差在晶圆和跨场之间具有非常高的可变性。结论:通过直接测量标准方法(OL结构上的光学IBO)无法获得的器件上的EPEinterlayer,我们证明了这种计量方法的可行性,并且在器件中观察到比IBO识别的更多的维度差异,从而能够更好地控制器件的模式变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterizing interlayer edge placement with SEM contours
Abstract. Background: The continuous scaling of integrated circuit requires not only a very good control of the device critical dimensions but also a very accurate control of the device overlay between layers to achieve satisfactory yields. These two critical factors can be combined to a single metric called interlayer edge placement error (EPEinterlayer) that quantifies the process margin necessary to keep a safe separation, extension, or overlap between the edges of a pattern in one layer with respect to another pattern in a second layer. Aim: The purpose of this work is to characterize with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the EPEinterlayer and overlay variances of complex contact shapes relative to a poly layer to assess the contributions of the systematic and random EPEinterlayer. Approach: SEM images of a few etched patterns were recorded sequentially for both contact and poly features at the same locations on the wafer. Then, SEM contours were extracted, aligned, and overlapped to derive EPEinterlayer. One experiment was focusing on intrawafer EPEinterlayer characterization whereas another was studying more specifically intrafield overlay variations. For the latter experiment, systematic overlay errors were added to facilitate the comparison of the SEM-based method with respect to a reference image-based overlay (IBO) method. Results: The earliest direct metrology of EPEinterlayer and overlay in device enabled by this work shows a very high variability of EPEinterlayer and overlay errors across wafer and across field. Conclusions: By directly measuring the EPEinterlayer on devices that are not accessible by the standard method (optical IBO on OL structures), we showed the feasibility of this metrology and observed more dimensional variance in devices than recognized with IBO, thereby enabling better control of device pattern variation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
30.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信