世卫组织在中国四省的耳部和听力障碍调查

X. Bu, Cheng Liu, G. Xing, Ling Zhou, Chuanyu Liang, Yunzhan Zheng, Juang Meng, Youqin Wang, Chong-xuan Yang, Yuqing Liu, B. Du, Yan Zhang, Bo Du
{"title":"世卫组织在中国四省的耳部和听力障碍调查","authors":"X. Bu, Cheng Liu, G. Xing, Ling Zhou, Chuanyu Liang, Yunzhan Zheng, Juang Meng, Youqin Wang, Chong-xuan Yang, Yuqing Liu, B. Du, Yan Zhang, Bo Du","doi":"10.3109/1651386X.2011.631285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: To investigate the population based prevalence of ear diseases and hearing impairment in Jiangsu, Sichuan, Guizhou and Jilin Provinces in China, develop strategies to provide scientific data for the global database and to draw up prevention and intervention strategies. Methods: Using the WHO Ear and Hearing Disorders Survey Protocol and the probability proportion to size (PPS) sampling technique, 30,733 residents were targeted for investigation in 150 clusters in four provinces. Every subject had an ear examination and pure tone audiometry. Definitions of disabling hearing loss and the classification of hearing impairment used were in accordance with WHO recommendations. Results: Among 30,733 targeted residents, 29,246 individuals (95.2%) participated in the survey. One thousand, three hundred and sixty individuals (4.4%) were absent; 127 individuals (0.4%) refused. The prevalences of hearing impairment and disabling hearing impairment were 14.2% and 5.2% of investigated individuals, respectively: 9.1% of the sample had a mild hearing loss, 3.8% a moderate degree of hearing loss, 1.1% a severe and 0.3% a profound hearing loss. Using data from the fifth population census in China (2000), we calculated the standardized rates of hearing impairment and hearing disability in our study to be 11.7% and 4.4%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the prevalence between males and females, urban and rural dwellers, as well as for different ages. The prevalence of ear diseases was 6.5% of investigated individuals: the standardized rate was 5.9%; 0.2% of investigated individuals had auricle malformation, 2.2% impacted cerumen, 0.2% otitis externa, 0.3% fungi, 0.1% foreign body, 0.1% acute otitis media, 0.9% chronic suppurative otitis media, 1.8% serous otitis media and 1.3% dry perforation of tympanic membrane. Overall, 8.0% of investigated persons were assessed to be likely to benefit from hearing aids, while 4.0% of persons needed medication, 0.1% language/speech rehabilitation, 1.5% non-urgent surgery and 0.9% other treatment. Conclusions: The high prevalence of hearing impairment and disability is a heavy burden on social development and also hinders normal family life. The government and society as a whole should show more concern about these problems. Strategies for prevention and intervention should be focused on less developed regions, rural areas, aging people and non-infectious conditions. Hearing aids services, medication, professional education and training are particularly important in developing countries.","PeriodicalId":88223,"journal":{"name":"Audiological medicine","volume":"112 1","pages":"141 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WHO Ear and Hearing Disorders Survey in four provinces in China\",\"authors\":\"X. Bu, Cheng Liu, G. Xing, Ling Zhou, Chuanyu Liang, Yunzhan Zheng, Juang Meng, Youqin Wang, Chong-xuan Yang, Yuqing Liu, B. Du, Yan Zhang, Bo Du\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/1651386X.2011.631285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective: To investigate the population based prevalence of ear diseases and hearing impairment in Jiangsu, Sichuan, Guizhou and Jilin Provinces in China, develop strategies to provide scientific data for the global database and to draw up prevention and intervention strategies. Methods: Using the WHO Ear and Hearing Disorders Survey Protocol and the probability proportion to size (PPS) sampling technique, 30,733 residents were targeted for investigation in 150 clusters in four provinces. Every subject had an ear examination and pure tone audiometry. Definitions of disabling hearing loss and the classification of hearing impairment used were in accordance with WHO recommendations. Results: Among 30,733 targeted residents, 29,246 individuals (95.2%) participated in the survey. One thousand, three hundred and sixty individuals (4.4%) were absent; 127 individuals (0.4%) refused. The prevalences of hearing impairment and disabling hearing impairment were 14.2% and 5.2% of investigated individuals, respectively: 9.1% of the sample had a mild hearing loss, 3.8% a moderate degree of hearing loss, 1.1% a severe and 0.3% a profound hearing loss. Using data from the fifth population census in China (2000), we calculated the standardized rates of hearing impairment and hearing disability in our study to be 11.7% and 4.4%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the prevalence between males and females, urban and rural dwellers, as well as for different ages. The prevalence of ear diseases was 6.5% of investigated individuals: the standardized rate was 5.9%; 0.2% of investigated individuals had auricle malformation, 2.2% impacted cerumen, 0.2% otitis externa, 0.3% fungi, 0.1% foreign body, 0.1% acute otitis media, 0.9% chronic suppurative otitis media, 1.8% serous otitis media and 1.3% dry perforation of tympanic membrane. Overall, 8.0% of investigated persons were assessed to be likely to benefit from hearing aids, while 4.0% of persons needed medication, 0.1% language/speech rehabilitation, 1.5% non-urgent surgery and 0.9% other treatment. Conclusions: The high prevalence of hearing impairment and disability is a heavy burden on social development and also hinders normal family life. The government and society as a whole should show more concern about these problems. Strategies for prevention and intervention should be focused on less developed regions, rural areas, aging people and non-infectious conditions. Hearing aids services, medication, professional education and training are particularly important in developing countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Audiological medicine\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"141 - 146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Audiological medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/1651386X.2011.631285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiological medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/1651386X.2011.631285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

摘要目的:了解中国江苏、四川、贵州和吉林四省人群耳部疾病和听力障碍患病率,为全球数据库提供科学数据,制定预防和干预策略。方法:采用世界卫生组织耳和听力障碍调查方案和概率比例抽样(PPS)方法,在4个省150个聚集区对30,733名居民进行调查。每个受试者都进行了耳部检查和纯音听力测定。致残性听力损失的定义和所使用的听力障碍分类符合世卫组织的建议。结果:在调查对象30,733人中,有29,246人(95.2%)参与了调查。16360人(4.4%)缺席;127人(0.4%)拒绝。听力障碍和致残性听力障碍患病率分别为14.2%和5.2%,其中轻度听力损失占9.1%,中度听力损失占3.8%,重度听力损失占1.1%,重度听力损失占0.3%。根据中国第五次人口普查(2000年)的数据,我们计算出本研究中听力损伤和听力残疾的标准化率分别为11.7%和4.4%。男性和女性、城市和农村居民以及不同年龄之间的患病率存在显著差异。耳部疾病患病率为6.5%,标准化率为5.9%;0.2%的调查对象有耳廓畸形、2.2%的耳垢、0.2%的外耳炎、0.3%的真菌、0.1%的异物、0.1%的急性中耳炎、0.9%的慢性化脓性中耳炎、1.8%的浆液性中耳炎和1.3%的鼓膜干穿孔。总体而言,8.0%的被调查者被评估为可能受益于助听器,而4.0%的人需要药物治疗,0.1%的人需要语言/言语康复,1.5%的人需要非紧急手术,0.9%的人需要其他治疗。结论:听力障碍和残疾的高发是社会发展的沉重负担,也阻碍了正常的家庭生活。政府和整个社会都应该更加关注这些问题。预防和干预战略应侧重于欠发达地区、农村地区、老年人和非传染性疾病。助听器服务、药物、专业教育和培训在发展中国家尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
WHO Ear and Hearing Disorders Survey in four provinces in China
Abstract Objective: To investigate the population based prevalence of ear diseases and hearing impairment in Jiangsu, Sichuan, Guizhou and Jilin Provinces in China, develop strategies to provide scientific data for the global database and to draw up prevention and intervention strategies. Methods: Using the WHO Ear and Hearing Disorders Survey Protocol and the probability proportion to size (PPS) sampling technique, 30,733 residents were targeted for investigation in 150 clusters in four provinces. Every subject had an ear examination and pure tone audiometry. Definitions of disabling hearing loss and the classification of hearing impairment used were in accordance with WHO recommendations. Results: Among 30,733 targeted residents, 29,246 individuals (95.2%) participated in the survey. One thousand, three hundred and sixty individuals (4.4%) were absent; 127 individuals (0.4%) refused. The prevalences of hearing impairment and disabling hearing impairment were 14.2% and 5.2% of investigated individuals, respectively: 9.1% of the sample had a mild hearing loss, 3.8% a moderate degree of hearing loss, 1.1% a severe and 0.3% a profound hearing loss. Using data from the fifth population census in China (2000), we calculated the standardized rates of hearing impairment and hearing disability in our study to be 11.7% and 4.4%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the prevalence between males and females, urban and rural dwellers, as well as for different ages. The prevalence of ear diseases was 6.5% of investigated individuals: the standardized rate was 5.9%; 0.2% of investigated individuals had auricle malformation, 2.2% impacted cerumen, 0.2% otitis externa, 0.3% fungi, 0.1% foreign body, 0.1% acute otitis media, 0.9% chronic suppurative otitis media, 1.8% serous otitis media and 1.3% dry perforation of tympanic membrane. Overall, 8.0% of investigated persons were assessed to be likely to benefit from hearing aids, while 4.0% of persons needed medication, 0.1% language/speech rehabilitation, 1.5% non-urgent surgery and 0.9% other treatment. Conclusions: The high prevalence of hearing impairment and disability is a heavy burden on social development and also hinders normal family life. The government and society as a whole should show more concern about these problems. Strategies for prevention and intervention should be focused on less developed regions, rural areas, aging people and non-infectious conditions. Hearing aids services, medication, professional education and training are particularly important in developing countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信