斯洛文尼亚今天的史学。

P. Vodopivec
{"title":"斯洛文尼亚今天的史学。","authors":"P. Vodopivec","doi":"10.7152/SSJ.V25I1.4259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Slovene historiography lived through the fall of communism, the disintegration of Yugoslavia, and the independence of Slovenia without major turmoil. In 1992, Vasko Simoniti, historian of the then younger generation, published a controversial article in the central historical studies review, Zgodovinski casopis, in which he claimed that \"as a rule historians [at the time of communism P. V] did not politically expose themselves,\" and that historical research in Slovenia (as elsewhere in Yugoslavia) after WW II was \"rather one-sided and (politically) controlled.\" I But Bogo Grafenauer, one of the \"fathers\" of contemporary Slovene historiography, firmly rebuked him and in an extensive reply tried to prove that in their research, in spite of pressures, historians had always followed professional standards fairly autonomously, and so the political change and democratic reforms of 1991 did not represent a specific turning point for them.","PeriodicalId":82261,"journal":{"name":"Papers in Slovene studies","volume":"211 1","pages":"5-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Historiography in Slovenia Today.\",\"authors\":\"P. Vodopivec\",\"doi\":\"10.7152/SSJ.V25I1.4259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Slovene historiography lived through the fall of communism, the disintegration of Yugoslavia, and the independence of Slovenia without major turmoil. In 1992, Vasko Simoniti, historian of the then younger generation, published a controversial article in the central historical studies review, Zgodovinski casopis, in which he claimed that \\\"as a rule historians [at the time of communism P. V] did not politically expose themselves,\\\" and that historical research in Slovenia (as elsewhere in Yugoslavia) after WW II was \\\"rather one-sided and (politically) controlled.\\\" I But Bogo Grafenauer, one of the \\\"fathers\\\" of contemporary Slovene historiography, firmly rebuked him and in an extensive reply tried to prove that in their research, in spite of pressures, historians had always followed professional standards fairly autonomously, and so the political change and democratic reforms of 1991 did not represent a specific turning point for them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Papers in Slovene studies\",\"volume\":\"211 1\",\"pages\":\"5-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Papers in Slovene studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7152/SSJ.V25I1.4259\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Papers in Slovene studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7152/SSJ.V25I1.4259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

斯洛文尼亚的史学经历了共产主义的垮台、南斯拉夫的解体和斯洛文尼亚的独立,但没有发生大的动荡。1992年,当时年轻一代的历史学家Vasko simoni在中央历史研究评论Zgodovinski casopis上发表了一篇有争议的文章,他在文章中声称,“一般来说,(共产主义时期的)历史学家不会在政治上暴露自己”,而且二战后斯洛文尼亚(和南斯拉夫其他地方一样)的历史研究“相当片面和(政治上)受控制”。但是,当代斯洛文尼亚史学的“父亲”之一Bogo Grafenauer坚定地谴责了他,并在一篇广泛的回复中试图证明,在他们的研究中,尽管有压力,历史学家总是相当自主地遵循专业标准,因此1991年的政治变革和民主改革对他们来说并不代表一个特定的转折点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Historiography in Slovenia Today.
Slovene historiography lived through the fall of communism, the disintegration of Yugoslavia, and the independence of Slovenia without major turmoil. In 1992, Vasko Simoniti, historian of the then younger generation, published a controversial article in the central historical studies review, Zgodovinski casopis, in which he claimed that "as a rule historians [at the time of communism P. V] did not politically expose themselves," and that historical research in Slovenia (as elsewhere in Yugoslavia) after WW II was "rather one-sided and (politically) controlled." I But Bogo Grafenauer, one of the "fathers" of contemporary Slovene historiography, firmly rebuked him and in an extensive reply tried to prove that in their research, in spite of pressures, historians had always followed professional standards fairly autonomously, and so the political change and democratic reforms of 1991 did not represent a specific turning point for them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信