重塑“英国性”和地点:约翰·斯塔普尔顿·格雷·彭伯顿19世纪对印度叛乱地点坎普尔和勒克瑙的记述

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY
M. Beattie
{"title":"重塑“英国性”和地点:约翰·斯塔普尔顿·格雷·彭伯顿19世纪对印度叛乱地点坎普尔和勒克瑙的记述","authors":"M. Beattie","doi":"10.3366/brw.2022.0380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focusses on a trip made by John Stapylton Grey Pemberton in 1887 to two major battle sites from the Indian Rebellion of 1857, the Memorial Well Gardens, Kanpur, and the Residency ruins, Lucknow. Both sites, despite being present in a foreign country, were invented and transformed after the rebellion in acts of national remembrance as places of ‘Englishness’. The selection of Pemberton's accounts are intended to explore how colonial spaces entered the discourse on ‘Englishness’, and how English colonists attempted to manifest their cultural identities and discipline the identities of their subordinates. By deciding to multiply its locations of identity beyond its own shores, the British Empire ensured that England would lose sovereign command of its ‘own’ spaces of identity. Kanpur and Lucknow were sites where England's narrative of belonging was de-stabilized and recreated, altered further by colonial subjects like Pemberton who came into contact with them. The idea of an autonomous English colonial space, separate from that of the colonised, needs to be replaced with a more fluid and mobile English subject.","PeriodicalId":53867,"journal":{"name":"Britain and the World","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remaking “Englishness” and Place: John Stapylton Grey Pemberton's Nineteenth-century Accounts of the Indian Rebellion Sites at Kanpur and Lucknow\",\"authors\":\"M. Beattie\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/brw.2022.0380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article focusses on a trip made by John Stapylton Grey Pemberton in 1887 to two major battle sites from the Indian Rebellion of 1857, the Memorial Well Gardens, Kanpur, and the Residency ruins, Lucknow. Both sites, despite being present in a foreign country, were invented and transformed after the rebellion in acts of national remembrance as places of ‘Englishness’. The selection of Pemberton's accounts are intended to explore how colonial spaces entered the discourse on ‘Englishness’, and how English colonists attempted to manifest their cultural identities and discipline the identities of their subordinates. By deciding to multiply its locations of identity beyond its own shores, the British Empire ensured that England would lose sovereign command of its ‘own’ spaces of identity. Kanpur and Lucknow were sites where England's narrative of belonging was de-stabilized and recreated, altered further by colonial subjects like Pemberton who came into contact with them. The idea of an autonomous English colonial space, separate from that of the colonised, needs to be replaced with a more fluid and mobile English subject.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Britain and the World\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Britain and the World\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/brw.2022.0380\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Britain and the World","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/brw.2022.0380","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章聚焦于John Stapylton Grey Pemberton在1887年的一次旅行,他去了1857年印度叛乱的两个主要战场,坎普尔的纪念井花园和勒克瑙的驻地废墟。这两个地方,尽管在异国他乡,都是在叛乱后作为“英国特色”的国家纪念活动中被发明和改造的。选择彭伯顿的描述是为了探索殖民空间如何进入“英国性”的话语,以及英国殖民者如何试图表现他们的文化身份并约束他们下属的身份。大英帝国决定在自己的海岸之外增加其身份认同的地点,这确保了英格兰将失去对“自己”身份认同空间的主权指挥。坎普尔和勒克瑙是英国关于归属感的叙述被破坏和重建的地方,彭伯顿等殖民地臣民与他们接触,进一步改变了这些地方。一个独立于被殖民者的独立的英国殖民地空间的想法,需要被一个更流畅和流动的英语主体所取代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Remaking “Englishness” and Place: John Stapylton Grey Pemberton's Nineteenth-century Accounts of the Indian Rebellion Sites at Kanpur and Lucknow
This article focusses on a trip made by John Stapylton Grey Pemberton in 1887 to two major battle sites from the Indian Rebellion of 1857, the Memorial Well Gardens, Kanpur, and the Residency ruins, Lucknow. Both sites, despite being present in a foreign country, were invented and transformed after the rebellion in acts of national remembrance as places of ‘Englishness’. The selection of Pemberton's accounts are intended to explore how colonial spaces entered the discourse on ‘Englishness’, and how English colonists attempted to manifest their cultural identities and discipline the identities of their subordinates. By deciding to multiply its locations of identity beyond its own shores, the British Empire ensured that England would lose sovereign command of its ‘own’ spaces of identity. Kanpur and Lucknow were sites where England's narrative of belonging was de-stabilized and recreated, altered further by colonial subjects like Pemberton who came into contact with them. The idea of an autonomous English colonial space, separate from that of the colonised, needs to be replaced with a more fluid and mobile English subject.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信