{"title":"英语旅游语篇中的可能性情态:三个网络语域的差异","authors":"Aleksandra M. Radovanović","doi":"10.5817/cz.muni.p280-0212-2022-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study explores central modals CAN, COULD, MAY, MIGHT, and the semi-auxiliary verb BE ABLE TO in tourism discourse with a focus on register variation. A small-scale analysis conducted on the tailor-made corpus (c. 131,000 words) of three text types/registers (promotional texts, e-newsletters, and managerial responses to guests’ reviews) revealed an important variation across registers in the distribution of possibility modals, the degree to which their polysemantic nature is displayed and in their capacity to serve specific metadiscoursal functions. The findings clearly indicate that the causes of the observed variation lie in the influence stemming from the differing situational characteristics, especially communicative purposes, interactiveness, topic domains, and personal involvement.","PeriodicalId":65030,"journal":{"name":"语言研究","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Possibility modals in English tourism discourse: Variation across three web registers\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandra M. Radovanović\",\"doi\":\"10.5817/cz.muni.p280-0212-2022-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study explores central modals CAN, COULD, MAY, MIGHT, and the semi-auxiliary verb BE ABLE TO in tourism discourse with a focus on register variation. A small-scale analysis conducted on the tailor-made corpus (c. 131,000 words) of three text types/registers (promotional texts, e-newsletters, and managerial responses to guests’ reviews) revealed an important variation across registers in the distribution of possibility modals, the degree to which their polysemantic nature is displayed and in their capacity to serve specific metadiscoursal functions. The findings clearly indicate that the causes of the observed variation lie in the influence stemming from the differing situational characteristics, especially communicative purposes, interactiveness, topic domains, and personal involvement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":65030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"语言研究\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"语言研究\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1092\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p280-0212-2022-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"语言研究","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p280-0212-2022-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究探讨了旅游语篇中中心情态CAN、COULD、MAY、MIGHT和半助动词BE ABLE TO的语域变异。对三种文本类型/语域(促销文本、电子通讯和对客人评论的管理回复)的定制语料库(约13.1万字)进行的一项小规模分析显示,在不同语域中,可能性情态的分布、其多义性的表现程度以及其服务特定元话语功能的能力存在重要差异。研究结果清楚地表明,所观察到的差异的原因在于不同情境特征的影响,特别是交际目的、互动性、话题领域和个人参与。
Possibility modals in English tourism discourse: Variation across three web registers
The present study explores central modals CAN, COULD, MAY, MIGHT, and the semi-auxiliary verb BE ABLE TO in tourism discourse with a focus on register variation. A small-scale analysis conducted on the tailor-made corpus (c. 131,000 words) of three text types/registers (promotional texts, e-newsletters, and managerial responses to guests’ reviews) revealed an important variation across registers in the distribution of possibility modals, the degree to which their polysemantic nature is displayed and in their capacity to serve specific metadiscoursal functions. The findings clearly indicate that the causes of the observed variation lie in the influence stemming from the differing situational characteristics, especially communicative purposes, interactiveness, topic domains, and personal involvement.