在线英语课程中高阶思维技能的评估:定量内容分析

Q1 Arts and Humanities
E. Johansson
{"title":"在线英语课程中高阶思维技能的评估:定量内容分析","authors":"E. Johansson","doi":"10.35360/NJES.519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies within second language learning indicate that higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) are important for the process of learning a new language. At the same time, previous literature indicates that assessment tasks in online courses often focus on lower-order thinking skills. Little is still known about if and how thinking skills are assessed in online EFL courses. Hence, the purpose of this study is to create a more comprehensive understanding of if and how online EFL students at Swedish universities are given opportunities to both develop and being assessed on such skills. According to the sociocultural perspective, collaboration is beneficial to students’ learning. Thus, the present study will also look into the correspondence between HOTS e-assessment tasks and collaborative e-assessment tasks. E-assessment tasks used in four online EFL courses given at Swedish universities have been classified according to the revised version of Bloom’s taxonomy. This has been done through a quantitative content analysis of used e-assessment tasks. The study found that the majority of courses included more e-assessment tasks focusing on higher-order thinking than on lower-order thinking. However, a significant difference was detected between literature and linguistics modules in the sense that literature modules include more HOTS e-assessment tasks. Moreover, the results suggest that collaborative e-assessment tasks are slightly more common in e-assessment tasks that focus on HOTS than on LOTS. The present study provides insight into how thinking skills are assessed and developed in online language courses.","PeriodicalId":35119,"journal":{"name":"NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies","volume":"38 1","pages":"224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Assessment of Higher-order Thinking Skills in Online EFL Courses: A Quantitative Content Analysis\",\"authors\":\"E. Johansson\",\"doi\":\"10.35360/NJES.519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Studies within second language learning indicate that higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) are important for the process of learning a new language. At the same time, previous literature indicates that assessment tasks in online courses often focus on lower-order thinking skills. Little is still known about if and how thinking skills are assessed in online EFL courses. Hence, the purpose of this study is to create a more comprehensive understanding of if and how online EFL students at Swedish universities are given opportunities to both develop and being assessed on such skills. According to the sociocultural perspective, collaboration is beneficial to students’ learning. Thus, the present study will also look into the correspondence between HOTS e-assessment tasks and collaborative e-assessment tasks. E-assessment tasks used in four online EFL courses given at Swedish universities have been classified according to the revised version of Bloom’s taxonomy. This has been done through a quantitative content analysis of used e-assessment tasks. The study found that the majority of courses included more e-assessment tasks focusing on higher-order thinking than on lower-order thinking. However, a significant difference was detected between literature and linguistics modules in the sense that literature modules include more HOTS e-assessment tasks. Moreover, the results suggest that collaborative e-assessment tasks are slightly more common in e-assessment tasks that focus on HOTS than on LOTS. The present study provides insight into how thinking skills are assessed and developed in online language courses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35360/NJES.519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35360/NJES.519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

第二语言学习的研究表明,高阶思维技能(HOTS)在学习一门新语言的过程中很重要。同时,以往的文献表明,在线课程的评估任务往往侧重于低阶思维技能。对于在线英语课程是否以及如何评估思维能力,我们知之甚少。因此,本研究的目的是更全面地了解瑞典大学的在线英语学生是否以及如何获得发展这些技能和评估这些技能的机会。从社会文化的角度来看,合作有利于学生的学习。因此,本研究还将探讨HOTS电子评估任务与协同电子评估任务之间的对应关系。在瑞典大学开设的四门在线英语课程中使用的电子评估任务已根据布鲁姆分类法的修订版进行了分类。这是通过对使用的电子评估任务进行定量内容分析来完成的。研究发现,大多数课程包含更多关注高阶思维的电子评估任务,而不是低阶思维。然而,文学模块和语言学模块之间存在显著差异,文学模块包含更多的HOTS电子评估任务。此外,研究结果表明,协作式电子评估任务在关注hot的电子评估任务中比关注lot的电子评估任务更常见。本研究为在线语言课程如何评估和发展思维技能提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Assessment of Higher-order Thinking Skills in Online EFL Courses: A Quantitative Content Analysis
Studies within second language learning indicate that higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) are important for the process of learning a new language. At the same time, previous literature indicates that assessment tasks in online courses often focus on lower-order thinking skills. Little is still known about if and how thinking skills are assessed in online EFL courses. Hence, the purpose of this study is to create a more comprehensive understanding of if and how online EFL students at Swedish universities are given opportunities to both develop and being assessed on such skills. According to the sociocultural perspective, collaboration is beneficial to students’ learning. Thus, the present study will also look into the correspondence between HOTS e-assessment tasks and collaborative e-assessment tasks. E-assessment tasks used in four online EFL courses given at Swedish universities have been classified according to the revised version of Bloom’s taxonomy. This has been done through a quantitative content analysis of used e-assessment tasks. The study found that the majority of courses included more e-assessment tasks focusing on higher-order thinking than on lower-order thinking. However, a significant difference was detected between literature and linguistics modules in the sense that literature modules include more HOTS e-assessment tasks. Moreover, the results suggest that collaborative e-assessment tasks are slightly more common in e-assessment tasks that focus on HOTS than on LOTS. The present study provides insight into how thinking skills are assessed and developed in online language courses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies
NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信