P. Parkin, J. deGroot, A. Macpherson, P. Fuselli, C. Macarthur
{"title":"加拿大两省家长对自行车头盔立法的态度和看法","authors":"P. Parkin, J. deGroot, A. Macpherson, P. Fuselli, C. Macarthur","doi":"10.24095/HPCDP.34.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nThe objective of this study was to survey Canadian parents on their attitudes and beliefs about bicycle helmet legislation and to compare responses from parents living in provinces with and without legislation.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA national survey of 1002 parents of children aged under 18 years was conducted. Chi-square tests were used to compare responses from the surveyed parents in the different jurisdictions.\n\n\nRESULTS\nResponses from parents living in provinces with legislation (n = 640) and without legislation (n = 362) were as follows: concern for injury (63% vs. 68%, nonsignificant [NS]); believe helmets are effective (98% vs. 98%, NS); child always wears a helmet (74% vs. 69%, NS); support legislation for children (95% vs. 83%, p < .001); support legislation for all ages (85% vs. 75%, p < .001); support police enforcement (83% vs. 76%, p = .003); believe legislation decreases the amount of time their child bicycles (5% vs. 8%, NS).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nParents are highly supportive of bicycle helmet legislation in Canada. They believe that bicycle helmets are effective and that legislation does not decrease the amount of time a child spends bicycling. There was also a high level of support for legislation across all ages, and for police enforcement.","PeriodicalId":50696,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada","volume":"129 1","pages":"8-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Canadian parents' attitudes and beliefs about bicycle helmet legislation in provinces with and without legislation.\",\"authors\":\"P. Parkin, J. deGroot, A. Macpherson, P. Fuselli, C. Macarthur\",\"doi\":\"10.24095/HPCDP.34.1.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\nThe objective of this study was to survey Canadian parents on their attitudes and beliefs about bicycle helmet legislation and to compare responses from parents living in provinces with and without legislation.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nA national survey of 1002 parents of children aged under 18 years was conducted. Chi-square tests were used to compare responses from the surveyed parents in the different jurisdictions.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nResponses from parents living in provinces with legislation (n = 640) and without legislation (n = 362) were as follows: concern for injury (63% vs. 68%, nonsignificant [NS]); believe helmets are effective (98% vs. 98%, NS); child always wears a helmet (74% vs. 69%, NS); support legislation for children (95% vs. 83%, p < .001); support legislation for all ages (85% vs. 75%, p < .001); support police enforcement (83% vs. 76%, p = .003); believe legislation decreases the amount of time their child bicycles (5% vs. 8%, NS).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nParents are highly supportive of bicycle helmet legislation in Canada. They believe that bicycle helmets are effective and that legislation does not decrease the amount of time a child spends bicycling. There was also a high level of support for legislation across all ages, and for police enforcement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada\",\"volume\":\"129 1\",\"pages\":\"8-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24095/HPCDP.34.1.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24095/HPCDP.34.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
本研究的目的是调查加拿大父母对自行车头盔立法的态度和信念,并比较居住在有和没有立法的省份的父母的反应。方法对1002名18岁以下儿童家长进行调查。卡方检验用于比较来自不同司法管辖区的被调查家长的回答。结果居住在有立法省(n = 640)和没有立法省(n = 362)的父母的回答如下:对伤害的关注(63%对68%,无统计学意义[NS]);认为头盔有效(98% vs. 98%, NS);儿童总是戴头盔(74% vs. 69%);支持儿童立法(95%对83%,p < 0.001);支持所有年龄段的立法(85%对75%,p < 0.001);支持警察执法(83%对76%,p = 0.003);认为立法减少了孩子骑自行车的时间(5%对8%,NS)。结论加拿大家长高度支持自行车头盔立法。他们认为自行车头盔是有效的,立法并没有减少孩子骑自行车的时间。对所有年龄段的立法和警察执法也有很高的支持。
Canadian parents' attitudes and beliefs about bicycle helmet legislation in provinces with and without legislation.
INTRODUCTION
The objective of this study was to survey Canadian parents on their attitudes and beliefs about bicycle helmet legislation and to compare responses from parents living in provinces with and without legislation.
METHODS
A national survey of 1002 parents of children aged under 18 years was conducted. Chi-square tests were used to compare responses from the surveyed parents in the different jurisdictions.
RESULTS
Responses from parents living in provinces with legislation (n = 640) and without legislation (n = 362) were as follows: concern for injury (63% vs. 68%, nonsignificant [NS]); believe helmets are effective (98% vs. 98%, NS); child always wears a helmet (74% vs. 69%, NS); support legislation for children (95% vs. 83%, p < .001); support legislation for all ages (85% vs. 75%, p < .001); support police enforcement (83% vs. 76%, p = .003); believe legislation decreases the amount of time their child bicycles (5% vs. 8%, NS).
CONCLUSION
Parents are highly supportive of bicycle helmet legislation in Canada. They believe that bicycle helmets are effective and that legislation does not decrease the amount of time a child spends bicycling. There was also a high level of support for legislation across all ages, and for police enforcement.