预览

Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/00144029221137263
J. Lloyd, W. Therrien
{"title":"预览","authors":"J. Lloyd, W. Therrien","doi":"10.1177/00144029221137263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The January 2023 issue of Exceptional Children includes diverse studies representing fine research. The articles range across multiple topics, different age groups, and various disabilities.We hope thatmore than one of themwill be particularly interesting to individual readers.We have two policy studies and four reports of original research. The first article analyzes the U.S. state of Texas’s policy that limited how many students could be identified as having a disability. Paul Morgan, Adrienne Woods, Yangyang Wang, and Cecelia Gloski examined how that policy affected identification of children as having disabilities. They found that Black students and English language learners were gradually less likely to be identified as having disabilities over the years that the policy was in effect. In another policy analysis, Qing Zhang and Jade Jenkins assessed whether the introduction of preK programs affected the enrollment of children with disabilities in Head Start programs. They found that U.S. states’ introduction of preK programs over 30 years resulted in a decrease in Head Start enrollment of children with disabilities. Anna Shapiro studied whether children’s ages when they begin school affected their access to special education services. Although she found little evidence of differences by gender, race, or socioeconomic status, she did find an overall effect indicating that younger students in a kindergarten cohort are more likely to be identified as having disabilities. Jan Blacher and Abbey Eisenhower assessed the frequency of children with autism being expelled from preschool and childcare programs as well as how subsequent teachers perceived those children. They report that about 1 in 6 preschoolers with autism had been expelled and that subsequent teachers described them as more likely to have more conflict, dependency, and externalizing behavior. At the other end of the age scale, Jennifer Freeman and Jacob Kirksey compared the extent to which parents of first-generation and native-born high school students with and without individualized education programs (IEPs) are engaged in their children’s education. They reported that first-generation students’ parents exhibit lower frequencies of school-based involvement compared with native-born students’ parents, but the parents of children with IEPs were more engaged, regardless of whether they were parents of first-generation or native-born students. And in another study related to adolescents, Pascale Dubois, Frédéric Guay, and MarieCatherine St-Pierre tested the contributions of motivation and parental support for autonomy to youths’ transition. They reported that autonomy support, especially from fathers and friends, promoted motivation and that positive motivation was associated with better outcomes. Each time we write these previews, we are regularly impressed with the quality of research questions covered in the articles and the quality of the research that authors submit to Exceptional Children. What is more, we are indebted to the uncompensated efforts of outstanding scholars to review submissions and offer Exceptional Children their informed and sage advice. We hope readers will appreciate the work of dozens of scholars in conducting and reporting these research articles and the efforts of EC’s field editors and ad hoc reviewers.Without their contributions, our work would be very difficult.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preview\",\"authors\":\"J. Lloyd, W. Therrien\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00144029221137263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The January 2023 issue of Exceptional Children includes diverse studies representing fine research. The articles range across multiple topics, different age groups, and various disabilities.We hope thatmore than one of themwill be particularly interesting to individual readers.We have two policy studies and four reports of original research. The first article analyzes the U.S. state of Texas’s policy that limited how many students could be identified as having a disability. Paul Morgan, Adrienne Woods, Yangyang Wang, and Cecelia Gloski examined how that policy affected identification of children as having disabilities. They found that Black students and English language learners were gradually less likely to be identified as having disabilities over the years that the policy was in effect. In another policy analysis, Qing Zhang and Jade Jenkins assessed whether the introduction of preK programs affected the enrollment of children with disabilities in Head Start programs. They found that U.S. states’ introduction of preK programs over 30 years resulted in a decrease in Head Start enrollment of children with disabilities. Anna Shapiro studied whether children’s ages when they begin school affected their access to special education services. Although she found little evidence of differences by gender, race, or socioeconomic status, she did find an overall effect indicating that younger students in a kindergarten cohort are more likely to be identified as having disabilities. Jan Blacher and Abbey Eisenhower assessed the frequency of children with autism being expelled from preschool and childcare programs as well as how subsequent teachers perceived those children. They report that about 1 in 6 preschoolers with autism had been expelled and that subsequent teachers described them as more likely to have more conflict, dependency, and externalizing behavior. At the other end of the age scale, Jennifer Freeman and Jacob Kirksey compared the extent to which parents of first-generation and native-born high school students with and without individualized education programs (IEPs) are engaged in their children’s education. They reported that first-generation students’ parents exhibit lower frequencies of school-based involvement compared with native-born students’ parents, but the parents of children with IEPs were more engaged, regardless of whether they were parents of first-generation or native-born students. And in another study related to adolescents, Pascale Dubois, Frédéric Guay, and MarieCatherine St-Pierre tested the contributions of motivation and parental support for autonomy to youths’ transition. They reported that autonomy support, especially from fathers and friends, promoted motivation and that positive motivation was associated with better outcomes. Each time we write these previews, we are regularly impressed with the quality of research questions covered in the articles and the quality of the research that authors submit to Exceptional Children. What is more, we are indebted to the uncompensated efforts of outstanding scholars to review submissions and offer Exceptional Children their informed and sage advice. We hope readers will appreciate the work of dozens of scholars in conducting and reporting these research articles and the efforts of EC’s field editors and ad hoc reviewers.Without their contributions, our work would be very difficult.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221137263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221137263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2023年1月出版的《杰出儿童》包括了代表优秀研究的各种研究。这些文章涵盖了多个主题、不同的年龄组和各种残疾。我们希望其中不止一个对个人读者来说是特别有趣的。我们有两份政策研究报告和四份原创研究报告。第一篇文章分析了美国德克萨斯州的政策,该政策限制了多少学生可以被认定为有残疾。Paul Morgan, Adrienne Woods, Yangyang Wang和Cecelia Gloski研究了该政策如何影响残疾儿童的识别。他们发现,在政策实施的这些年里,黑人学生和英语学习者被认定为残疾的可能性逐渐降低。在另一项政策分析中,Qing Zhang和Jade Jenkins评估了学前教育项目的引入是否影响了残疾儿童在学前教育项目中的入学率。他们发现,美国各州在过去30年里引入学前教育项目,导致残疾儿童入学人数减少。安娜·夏皮罗研究了儿童入学的年龄是否会影响他们获得特殊教育服务的机会。虽然她没有发现性别、种族或社会经济地位差异的证据,但她确实发现了一个总体效应,表明幼儿园队列中年龄较小的学生更有可能被认定为有残疾。Jan Blacher和Abbey Eisenhower评估了自闭症儿童被幼儿园和儿童保育项目开除的频率,以及后来的老师如何看待这些孩子。他们报告说,大约六分之一患有自闭症的学龄前儿童被驱逐,后来的老师形容他们更有可能有更多的冲突、依赖和外化行为。在年龄范围的另一端,Jennifer Freeman和Jacob Kirksey比较了第一代和本土出生的高中生的父母在多大程度上参与了孩子的教育,这些学生是否接受了个性化教育计划(IEPs)。他们报告说,与本土出生的学生父母相比,第一代学生的父母表现出较低的校本参与频率,但有iep的孩子的父母更投入,无论他们是第一代学生的父母还是本土出生的学生的父母。在另一项与青少年有关的研究中,帕斯卡尔·杜波依斯、弗莱姆·格伊和玛丽·凯瑟琳·圣皮埃尔测试了动机和父母对自主的支持对青少年过渡的贡献。他们报告说,自主支持,特别是来自父亲和朋友的支持,促进了动机,积极的动机与更好的结果有关。每次我们写这些预览时,我们都会对文章中涉及的研究问题的质量以及作者提交给《卓越儿童》的研究质量印象深刻。更重要的是,我们感谢杰出的学者们无偿的努力,他们审查提交的材料,并为“特殊儿童”提供明智的建议。我们希望读者能够欣赏数十位学者在指导和报告这些研究文章方面所做的工作,以及欧共体的现场编辑和特别审稿人的努力。没有他们的贡献,我们的工作将会很困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Preview
The January 2023 issue of Exceptional Children includes diverse studies representing fine research. The articles range across multiple topics, different age groups, and various disabilities.We hope thatmore than one of themwill be particularly interesting to individual readers.We have two policy studies and four reports of original research. The first article analyzes the U.S. state of Texas’s policy that limited how many students could be identified as having a disability. Paul Morgan, Adrienne Woods, Yangyang Wang, and Cecelia Gloski examined how that policy affected identification of children as having disabilities. They found that Black students and English language learners were gradually less likely to be identified as having disabilities over the years that the policy was in effect. In another policy analysis, Qing Zhang and Jade Jenkins assessed whether the introduction of preK programs affected the enrollment of children with disabilities in Head Start programs. They found that U.S. states’ introduction of preK programs over 30 years resulted in a decrease in Head Start enrollment of children with disabilities. Anna Shapiro studied whether children’s ages when they begin school affected their access to special education services. Although she found little evidence of differences by gender, race, or socioeconomic status, she did find an overall effect indicating that younger students in a kindergarten cohort are more likely to be identified as having disabilities. Jan Blacher and Abbey Eisenhower assessed the frequency of children with autism being expelled from preschool and childcare programs as well as how subsequent teachers perceived those children. They report that about 1 in 6 preschoolers with autism had been expelled and that subsequent teachers described them as more likely to have more conflict, dependency, and externalizing behavior. At the other end of the age scale, Jennifer Freeman and Jacob Kirksey compared the extent to which parents of first-generation and native-born high school students with and without individualized education programs (IEPs) are engaged in their children’s education. They reported that first-generation students’ parents exhibit lower frequencies of school-based involvement compared with native-born students’ parents, but the parents of children with IEPs were more engaged, regardless of whether they were parents of first-generation or native-born students. And in another study related to adolescents, Pascale Dubois, Frédéric Guay, and MarieCatherine St-Pierre tested the contributions of motivation and parental support for autonomy to youths’ transition. They reported that autonomy support, especially from fathers and friends, promoted motivation and that positive motivation was associated with better outcomes. Each time we write these previews, we are regularly impressed with the quality of research questions covered in the articles and the quality of the research that authors submit to Exceptional Children. What is more, we are indebted to the uncompensated efforts of outstanding scholars to review submissions and offer Exceptional Children their informed and sage advice. We hope readers will appreciate the work of dozens of scholars in conducting and reporting these research articles and the efforts of EC’s field editors and ad hoc reviewers.Without their contributions, our work would be very difficult.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信