{"title":"静态堆,被动曝气堆肥的粪肥泥浆使用泥炭作为膨胀剂","authors":"S.P. Mathur , N.K. Patni , M.P. Lévesque","doi":"10.1016/0269-7483(90)90033-O","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The feasibility of composting high-moisture manure slurries in combination with hydrophilic peat moss was examined. Horticultural grade peat, with or without lime (1% Ca in peat), was mixed with manure slurries from dairy cows, poultry, or sheep, in a feed-mixer. The mixtures were discharged on to a bed of peat (10 cm), overlain by horizontal perforated pipes open to the atmosphere, to construct small windrows which were then covered by a 5-cm layer of deodorizing and hygienic peat. The amphoteric peat of acidic pH adsorbed the NH<sub>3</sub> and any other malodorous compounds, and its fibrosity (bulk density 0·06 g cm<sup>−3</sup>) supported aerobic thermophilic decomposition in which neither malodorous amines nor sulphides were produced significantly. No detectable NH<sub>3</sub> or H<sub>2</sub>S emanated from the compost piles. Temperatures greater than 45°C were reached in the composts within 1–3 days and maintained above 45°C for 2–5 weeks without further mixing of the composts, or any mechanical aeration. When the composts were remixed and reheaped, 7 weeks after initial formulation, no reheating occurred—suggesting that the composts were ‘biostable’, as is peat. Germination tests confirmed the ‘biostability’. The mature composts had water-holding capacities nearly equal to that of the original peat, suggesting that the air-dried peat-manure composts can be recharged with manure slurries. The properties of the composts suggested that they could be marketed and used as a substitute or supplement for the limed and fertilized peat generally used in gardening, landscaping and greenhouse culture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100177,"journal":{"name":"Biological Wastes","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 323-333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0269-7483(90)90033-O","citationCount":"49","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Static pile, passive aeration composting of manure slurries using peat as a bulking agent\",\"authors\":\"S.P. Mathur , N.K. Patni , M.P. Lévesque\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0269-7483(90)90033-O\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The feasibility of composting high-moisture manure slurries in combination with hydrophilic peat moss was examined. Horticultural grade peat, with or without lime (1% Ca in peat), was mixed with manure slurries from dairy cows, poultry, or sheep, in a feed-mixer. The mixtures were discharged on to a bed of peat (10 cm), overlain by horizontal perforated pipes open to the atmosphere, to construct small windrows which were then covered by a 5-cm layer of deodorizing and hygienic peat. The amphoteric peat of acidic pH adsorbed the NH<sub>3</sub> and any other malodorous compounds, and its fibrosity (bulk density 0·06 g cm<sup>−3</sup>) supported aerobic thermophilic decomposition in which neither malodorous amines nor sulphides were produced significantly. No detectable NH<sub>3</sub> or H<sub>2</sub>S emanated from the compost piles. Temperatures greater than 45°C were reached in the composts within 1–3 days and maintained above 45°C for 2–5 weeks without further mixing of the composts, or any mechanical aeration. When the composts were remixed and reheaped, 7 weeks after initial formulation, no reheating occurred—suggesting that the composts were ‘biostable’, as is peat. Germination tests confirmed the ‘biostability’. The mature composts had water-holding capacities nearly equal to that of the original peat, suggesting that the air-dried peat-manure composts can be recharged with manure slurries. The properties of the composts suggested that they could be marketed and used as a substitute or supplement for the limed and fertilized peat generally used in gardening, landscaping and greenhouse culture.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Wastes\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 323-333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0269-7483(90)90033-O\",\"citationCount\":\"49\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Wastes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/026974839090033O\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Wastes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/026974839090033O","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49
摘要
考察了高湿粪肥浆料与亲水性泥炭苔藓复合堆肥的可行性。园艺级泥炭,含或不含石灰(泥炭中钙含量为1%),与奶牛、家禽或绵羊的粪便浆液在饲料搅拌器中混合。这些混合物被排放到泥炭床(10厘米)上,上面覆盖着向大气开放的水平穿孔管道,形成小窗户,然后用5厘米厚的除臭和卫生泥炭覆盖。酸性两性泥炭吸附NH3和其他任何恶臭化合物,其纤维性(容重0.06 g cm−3)支持好氧嗜热分解,在该过程中不产生显著的恶臭胺和硫化物。堆肥堆中没有可检测到的NH3或H2S。堆肥温度在1-3天内达到45°C以上,并在没有进一步混合堆肥或任何机械曝气的情况下保持在45°C以上2-5周。当堆肥在初始配方后7周重新混合并重新堆积时,没有再加热发生,这表明堆肥是“生物稳定的”,就像泥炭一样。发芽试验证实了它的“生物稳定性”。成熟堆肥的持水能力与原始泥炭的持水能力基本相当,说明风干的泥炭-粪肥堆肥可以用粪肥浆液补充。堆肥的性质表明,它们可以作为一种替代或补充石灰和施肥泥炭一般用于园艺,园林绿化和温室栽培。
Static pile, passive aeration composting of manure slurries using peat as a bulking agent
The feasibility of composting high-moisture manure slurries in combination with hydrophilic peat moss was examined. Horticultural grade peat, with or without lime (1% Ca in peat), was mixed with manure slurries from dairy cows, poultry, or sheep, in a feed-mixer. The mixtures were discharged on to a bed of peat (10 cm), overlain by horizontal perforated pipes open to the atmosphere, to construct small windrows which were then covered by a 5-cm layer of deodorizing and hygienic peat. The amphoteric peat of acidic pH adsorbed the NH3 and any other malodorous compounds, and its fibrosity (bulk density 0·06 g cm−3) supported aerobic thermophilic decomposition in which neither malodorous amines nor sulphides were produced significantly. No detectable NH3 or H2S emanated from the compost piles. Temperatures greater than 45°C were reached in the composts within 1–3 days and maintained above 45°C for 2–5 weeks without further mixing of the composts, or any mechanical aeration. When the composts were remixed and reheaped, 7 weeks after initial formulation, no reheating occurred—suggesting that the composts were ‘biostable’, as is peat. Germination tests confirmed the ‘biostability’. The mature composts had water-holding capacities nearly equal to that of the original peat, suggesting that the air-dried peat-manure composts can be recharged with manure slurries. The properties of the composts suggested that they could be marketed and used as a substitute or supplement for the limed and fertilized peat generally used in gardening, landscaping and greenhouse culture.